Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accounts of Conduct in Interaction: Interruption, Overlap, and Turn-Taking

  • Chapter
Handbook of Sociological Theory

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bennett, A. (1981). Interruptions and the interpretation of conversation. Discourse Processes, 4, 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1999a). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society, 10, 543–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1999b). Conversation analysis and the claims of naivete. Discourse & Society, 10, 572–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1979). Social structure, groups and interaction. In K. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social markers of speech (pp. 292–341). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, S. E., & Whalen, J. (1988/1989). When the medium becomes the message: The case of the Rather-Bush appointment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22, 241–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J. (1988). Gossip revisited: Language in all-female groups. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex (pp. 94–122). London, New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J., & Cameron, D. (Ed.). (1988). Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex. London, New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelsky, C. (1981). Who’s got the floor? Language in Society, 10, 383–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, M. (1997). Schisming: The collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources of the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P, & Local, J. K. (1983). Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. (1975). Ethnomethodology: The re-enchantment industry or a Californian way of subjectivity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 5, 431–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. H. (1997). By-play: Negotiating evaluation in story-telling. In G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin, & J. Baugh (Eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov, Volume 2: Social interaction and discourse structures (pp. 77–102). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. C. (1995). Conversation analysis: Methodological aspects. In U. M. Quasthoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication (pp. 391–418). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (Ed.). (1997). Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D., & Clarke, S. (1993). Women, men, and interruptions: A critical review. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversation interaction (p. 231–280). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge & K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. D’urso & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetorics (pp. 11–38). Padova, Italy: CLEUP Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1997). A note on laughter in “male-female” interaction. Paper delivered at the annual Conference of the Center for Language, Interaction and Culture (CLIC), UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P., Blumstein, E, & Schwartz, P. (1985). Sex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50, 24–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and women’s place. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. H. (1991). On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in society, 20, 441–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17, 365–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, M. (1988). Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (1985). Toward a model of members’ methods for recognizing interruptions. Language in Society, 13, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (1988). The sound of simultaneous speech, the meaning of interruption: A rejoinder. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 115–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O., & Covelli, L. H. (1988). Women and men speaking at the same time. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1972a). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational materials for doing sociology. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1972b). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 325–345). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation, 2 volumes, G. Jefferson (Ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair for syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 261–288). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University oundtable on languages and linguistics 1981; Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 89–135). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1988/1989). From interview to confrontation: Observations on the Bush/Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22, 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Introduction, Volume 1. In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Harvey Sacks: Lectures on conversation (pp. ix–lxii). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 99–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: Contingency in action, interaction and co-participant context. In E. H. Hovy & D. Scott (Eds.), Computational and conversational discourse: Burning issues-An interdisciplinary account (pp. 3–38). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1996c). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 161–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1996d). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B. A. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 437–485). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1997a). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8, 165–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1997b). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41, 235–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1999a). “Schegloff’s Texts” as “Billig’s Data”: A critical reply to Billig. Discourse & Society, 10, 558–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1999b). Naivete vs. sophistication or discipline vs. self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig. Discourse & Society, 10, 577–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2000a). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2000b). On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 715–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A., Ochs, E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Introduction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 1–51). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L., & Brody, C. (1989). Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review, 54, 424–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A., & Jordan, B. (1990). Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, M. (1988). The operation was a success; unfortunately the patient died: A common on “Women and Men Speaking at the Same Time,” by Murray and Covelli. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 113–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1983). When is an overlap not an interruption? One component of conversational style. In R. J. Dipietro, W. Frawley, & A. Wedel (Eds.), The first Delaware symposium on language studies (pp. 119–129). Newark: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1989). Interpreting interruption in conversation. In Papers from the 25th annual regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (pp. 266–287). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Guenther Roth & Claus Wittich, Trans.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, B., & Macfarlane, S. (1998). Prosody as an interactional resource; Turn-projection and overlap. Language and Speech, 41, 265–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. (1979). Against our will: Male interruptions of females in cross-sex conversation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. (1984). when the doctor is a “lady”: Power, status and gender in physician-patient exchanges. Symbolic Interaction, 7, 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 102–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105–129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Emanuel A. Schegloff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, Riverside, California

    Jonathan H. Turner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schegloff, E.A. (2001). Accounts of Conduct in Interaction: Interruption, Overlap, and Turn-Taking. In: Turner, J.H. (eds) Handbook of Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-32458-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36274-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation