Skip to main content

Measuring Progressivity and Vertical Equity

  • Chapter
Poverty and Equity

Part of the book series: Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being ((EIAP,volume 2))

Abstract

As is well-known, the assessment of tax and transfer systems draws mainly on two fundamental principles: efficiency and equity. The former relates to the presence of distortions in the economic behavior of agents, while the latter focuses on distributive justice. Vertical equity as a principle of distributive justice is rarely questioned as such, although the extent to which it must be precisely weighted against efficiency is a matter of intense disagreement among policy analysts. A principle of redistributive justice which gathers even greater support is that of horizontal equity, the equal treatment of equals. The HE principle is often seen as a consequence of the fundamental moral principle of the equal worth of human beings, and as a corollary of the equal sacrifice theories of taxation. This chapter and the next cover in turn the measurement of each of these principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7.7 References

  • Aaberge, R., A. Bjorklund, M. Jantti, P. Pedersen, N. Smith, and T. Wennemo (2000): “Unemployment Shocks and Income Distribution: How Did the Nordic Countries Fare during Their Crises?” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102, 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achdut, L. (1996): “Income Inequality, Income Composition and Macroeconomic Trends: Israel, 1979–93,” Economica, 63, 27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altshuler, R. and A. Schwartz (1996): “On the Progressivity of the Child Care Tax Credit: Snapshot versus Time-Exposure Incidence,” National Tax Journal, 49, 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S. (1987): “On the Measurement of Tax Progressivity: Relative Share Adjustment,” Public Finance Quarterly, 15, 166–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1998): “Measuring Tax Progressivity: Compatible Global and Local Indexes,” Public Finance Review, 26, 447–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J., V. Chow, and J. Formby (1995a): “The Redistributive Effect of Direct Taxes: A Comparison of Six Luxembourg Income Study-Countries,” Journal of Income Distribution, 5, 65–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C. and D. Donaldson (1984): “Ethical Social Index Numbers and the Measurement of Effective Tax/Benefit Progressivity,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 17, 683–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, W. and H. Kahen Jr. (1963): The Uneasy Case for Progressive Taxation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, M., P. Mason, and S. Shapiro (1991): “The Incidence of Taxes on Casino Gambling: Exploiting the Tired and Poor,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 50, 323–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, M. and D. Reed (1998): “Assessing the Effects of Wives’ Earnings on Family Income Inequality,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caspersen, E. and G. Metcalf (1994): “Is a Value Added Tax Regressive? Annual versus Lifetime Incidence Measures,” National Tax Journal, 47, 731–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassady, K., G. Ruggeri, and D. van Wart (1996): “On the Classification and Interpretation of Progressivity Measures,” Public Finance Review, 51, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creedy. J. and J. van de Ven (2001): “Decomposing Redistributive Effects of Taxes and Transfers in Australia: Annual and Lifetime Measures,” Australian Economic Papers, 40, 185–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dardanoni, V. and P. Lambert (2002): “Progressivity Comparisons,” Journal of Public Economics, 86, 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. and J.-Y. Duclos (1997): “Statistical Inference for the Measurement of the Incidence of Taxes and Transfers,” Econometrica, 65, 1453–65.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. and M. Hoy (2002): “Flat Rate Taxes and Inequality Measurement,” Journal of Public Economics, 84, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decoster, A. and G. Van Camp (2001): “Redistributive Effects of the Shift from Personal Income Taxes to Indirect Taxes: Belgium 1988–1993,” Fiscal Studies, 22, 79–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilnot, A., J. Kay, and C. Norris (1984): “The UK Tax System, Strusture and Progressivity, 1948–1982,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86, 150–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.-Y. (1995a): “Assessing the Performance of an Income Tax,” Bulletin of Economic Research, 47, 115–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.-Y. (1997b): “Measuring Progressivity and Inequality,” in Inequality and taxation. Research on Economic Inequality, vol. 7. Greenwich, Conn, ed. by S. Zandvakili, and London: JA1 Press, 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.-Y. (1998): “Social Evaluation Functions, Economic Isolation and the Suits Index of Progressivity,” Journal of Public Economics, 69, 103–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.-Y. (2000): “Gini indices and the Redistribution of Income,” International Tax and Public Finance, 7, 141–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.-Y. and M. Tabi (1996): “The Measurement of Progressivity, with an Application to Canada,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999): “Inégalité et redistribution du revenu, avec une application au Canada,” L’Actualité économique, 75, 95–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellman, J. (1976): “The Effect of Transformations on Lorenz Curves,” Econometrica, 44, 823–4.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2001); “Mathematical Properties of Classes of Income Redistributive Policies,” European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 179–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellman, J., M. Jäntti, and P. Lambert (1999): “Optimal Tax-Transfer Systems and Redistributive Policy,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101, 115–26.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Formby, J., T. Seaks, and W. Smith (1984): “Difficulties in the Measurement and Comparison of Tax Progressivity: The Case of North America,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 39, 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Formby, J., W. Smith, and D. Sykes (1986): “Income Redistribution and Local Tax Progressivity: A Reconsideration,” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, XIX, 808–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formby, J., W. Smith, and P. Thistle (1987): “Difficulties in the Measurement of Tax Progressivity; Further Analysis,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 42, 438–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1990): “The Average Tax Burden and the Welfare Implications of Global Tax Progressivity,” Public Finance Quarterly, 18, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, C. and P. Johnson (1994): “Tax Reform in the UK and Changes in the Progressivity of the Tax System, 1985–95,” Fiscal Studies, 15, 64–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, J. (1992): “Equity Effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, B. and L. Shi (2001): “The Effects of Transition on the Distribution of Income in China: A Study Decomposing She GINI Coefficient for 1988 and 1995,” Economics of Transition, 9, 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanratty, M. and R. Blank (1992): “Down and Out in North America: Recent Trends in Poverty Rates in the United States and Canada,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 233–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, K., D. Slottje, and P. Lambert (1992): “Evaluating Effective Income Tax Progression,” Journal of Public Economics, 56, 461–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heady, C., T. Mitrakos, and P. Tsakloglou (2001): “The Distributional Impact of Social Transfers in the European Union; Evidence from the ECHP,” Fiscal Studies, 22, 547–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, I. (1991): “Distributional Effects of Housing Subsidies in the United Kingdom,” Journal of Public Economics, 44, 321–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R., G. Ruggeri, and D. Van Wart (1994): “The redistributional Impact of Taxation in Canada,” Canadian Tax Journal, 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, U. (1976): “On the Measurement of the Degree of Progression,” Journal of Public Economics, 5, 161–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N. (1977a): “Applications of Lorenz Curves in Economic Analysis,” Econometrica, 45, 719–28.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1977b): “Measurement of Tax Progressivity: An International Comparison,” Economic Journal, 87, 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N. (1987): “Measures of Tax Progressivity and Redistribution Effect: A Comment,” Public Finance / Finances Publiques, 42, 431–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M., H. Papapanagos, and A. Shorrocks (2000): “Tax Reform and Progressivity,” Economic Journal, 110, 50–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, M. (2000): “The Distributional Impact of Direct Payments on Irish Farm Incomes,” Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51, 252–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khetan, C. and S. Poddar (1976): “Measurement of Income Tax Progression in A Growing Economy: The Canadian Experience,” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, IX, 613–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, D. (1984): “Distributional Tax Progressivity Indexes,” National Tax Journal, 37, 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, P. (1993): “Evaluating Impact Effects of Tax Reforms,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 7, 205–42.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • — (2001): The distribution and redistribution of income, Third edition. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press; distributed by Palgrave, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, P. and W. Pfahler (1992): “Income Tax Progression and Redistributive Effect: The Influence of Changes in the Pre-tax Income Distribution,” Public Finance, 47, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, P. and M. Ravallion (1999): “Benefit Incidence, Public Spending Reforms, and the Timing of Program Capture,” World Bank Economic Review, 13, 257–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, R. (1993): “A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Greater Conditional Progressivity,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 26, 919–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • le Breton, M., P. Moyes, and A. Trannoy (1996): “Inequality Reducing Properties of Composite Taxation,” Journal of Economic Theory, 69, 71–103.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leibbrandt, M., C. Woolard, and I. Woolard (2000): “The Contribution of Income Components to Income Inequality in the Rural Former Homelands of South Africa: A Decomposable Gini Analysis,” Journal of African Economies, 9, 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, R. (1999): “How Do Income Sources Affect Income Inequality?” in Handbook of income inequality measurement. With a foreword by Amartya Sen, ed. by J. Silber, Boston; Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic, Recent Economic Thought, 341–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, R. and S. Yitzhaki (1985): “Income Inequality Effects by Income Source: A New Approach and Applications to the United Slates,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P. W. (1985): “Lorenz Domination and Global Tax Progressivity,” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’Economique, XVIII, 395–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. and C. Revier (1988): “Measuring Progressivity of Excise Taxes: A Buyers Index,” Public Finance Quarterly, 16, 301–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, A. and R. Schwas (1995); “Consumption Taxes in a Life-Cycle Framework: Are Sin Taxes Regressive,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehran, F. (1976): “Linear Measures of Income Inequality,” Econometrica, 44, 805–09.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mercader Prats, M. (1997): “On the Distributive and Incentive Effects of the Spanish Income Tax: A Comparison of 1980 and 1994,” European Economic Review, 41, 609–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, G. (1994): “The Lifetime Incidence of State and Local Taxes: Measuring Changes During the 1980s,” Tech. Rep. 4252, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (1994a): “Comment on ‘Income Tax Progression and Redistributive Effect: The Influence of Changes in the Pre-Tax Income Distribution,” Public Finance / Finances Publiques, 49, 126–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (1995): “The Distributional Impact of Cash and In-Kind Transfers in Eastern Europe and Russia,” in Public spending and the poor: Theory and evidence, ed. by D. van de Walle and K. Nead, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank, 489–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. and T. Sicular (2002): “Rethinking Inequality Decomposition, with Evidence from Rural China,” Economic Journal, 112, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. and I. Preston (1986): “Taxes, Benefits and the Distribution of Income 1968–83,” Fiscal Studies, 7, 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyes, P. and A. Shorrocks (1998): “The Impossibility of a Progressive Tax Structure,” Journal of Public Economics, 69, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. and T. Thin (1948): “Income Tax Progression 1929–48,” The Journal of Political Economy, 56, 498–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen, J. (1998): “Annual versus Lifetime income Redistribution by Social Security,” Journal of Public Economics, 68, 223–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norregaard, J. (1990): “Progressivity of Income Tax Systems,” OECD Economic Studies, 15, 83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins, M. and P. Ruggles (1981): “The Distribution of Public Expenditures and Taxes Among Households in the United Kingdom,” The Review of Income and Wealth, 27, 298–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins, M., G. Schmaus, and G. Stephenson (1989): “Income Distribution and Redistribution: A Microdata Analysis for Seven Countries,” Review of Income and Wealth, 35, 107–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. (1975): “Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff,” Tech. rep., Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechman, J. (1985): Who Paid the Taxes 1966–1985?, Brookings Institution, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, M. and P. Wissen (1984): “Redistributional Aspects of Tax Evasion,” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86, 131–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfahler, W. (1983): “Measuring Redistributional Effects of Tax Progressivity by Lorenz Curves,” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 198, 237–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1987): “Redistributive Effects of Tax Progressivity; Evaluating a General Class of Aggregate Measures,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 42, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podder, N. (1993): “The Disaggregation of the Gini Coefficient by Factor Components and Its Applications to Australia,” Review of Income and Wealth, 39, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podder, N. and S. Chatterjee (2002): “Sharing the National Cake in Post Reform New Zealand: Income Inequality Trends in Terms of Income Sources,” Journal of Public Economics, 86, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodder, N. and P. Mukhopadhaya (2001): “The Changing Pattern of Sources of income and Its Impact on Inequality: The Method and Its Application to Australia, 1975–94,” Economic Record, 77, 242–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. and S. Novak (1999): “The Tax Incidence of Three Texas Lottery Games: Regressivity, Race, and Education,” National Tax Journal, 52, 741–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. and M. Cancian (2001): “Sources of Inequality: Measuring the Contributions of Income Sources to Rising Family Income Inequality,” Review of Income and Wealth, 47, 321–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggeri, G., D. Van Wart, and R. Howard (1994): “The Redistributional Impact of Government Spending in Canada,” Public Finance, 49, 212–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, P. and M. O’Higgins (1981): “The Distribution of Public Expenditure among Households in the United Stales,” The Review of Income and Wealth, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahn, D. and D. Stifel (2000): “Poverty Comparisons Over Time and Across Countries in Africa,” World Development, 28, 2123–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, H. and B. Gustafsson (1991): “Income Redistribution Effects of Tax Reforms in Sweden,” Journal of Policy Modeling, 13, 551–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A. (1982): “Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components,” Econometrica, 50, 193–211.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Silber, J. (1989): “Factor Components, Population Subgroups and the Computation of the Gini Index of Inequality,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1993): “Inequality Decomposition by Income Source: A Note,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 545–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slitor, R. (1948): “The Measurement of Progressivity and Built-in Flexibility,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62, 309–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T. and J. Coder (1995): “Income Inequality in Rich Countries during the 1980s,” Journal of Income Distribution, 5, 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotomayor, O. (1996): “Poverty and Income Inequality in Puerto Rico, 1969–89: Trends and Sources,” Review of Income and Wealth, 42, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suits, D. (1977): “Measurement of Tax Progressivity,” American Economic Review, 67, 747–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thistle, P. (1988): “Uniform Progressivity, Residual Progression, and Single-Crossing,” Journal of Public Economics, 37, 121–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Walle, D. (1998a): “Assessing the Welfare Impacts of Public Spending,” World Development, 26, 365–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Doorslaer, E., A. Wagstaff, H. van der Burg, T. Christiansen, G. Citoni, R. Di Biase, U.-G. Gerdtham, M. Gerfin, L. Gross, and U. Hakinnen (1999): “The Redistributive Effect of Health Care Finance in Twelve OECD Countries,” Journal of Health Economics, 18, 291–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermaeten, A., I. Gillespie, and F. Vermaeten (1995): “Who Paid the Taxes in Canada, 1951–1988?” Canadian Public Policy, 21, 317–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1972): Agenda for Progressive Taxation, New York: NY: Ronald Press, 1st ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, A. and E. van Doorslaer (1997): “Progressivity, horizontal equity and rerankiing in health care finance: a decomposition analysis for the Netherlands,” Journal of Health Economics, 16, 499–516.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, A., E. van Doorslaer, V. Hattem, S. Calonge, T. Christiansen, G. Citoni, U. Gerdtham, M. Gerfin, L. Gross, and U. Hakinnen (1999): “Redistributive Effect, Progressivity and Differential Tax Treatment: Personal Income Taxes in Twelve OECD Countries,” Journal of Public Economics, 72, 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodon, Q. (1999): “Between Group Inequality and Targeted Transfers,” Review of Income and Wealth, 45, 21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodon, Q. and S. Yitzhaki (2002): “Evaluating the Impact of Government Programs on Social Welfare: The Role of Targeting and the Allocation Rules among Program Beneficiaries,” Public Finance Review, 30, 102–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, S. (1997): “Decomposition of Gini Coefficients by Income Factors: A New Approach and Application,” Applied Economics Letters, 4, 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younger, S., D. Sahn, S. Haggblade, and P. Dorosh (1999): “Tax Incidence in Madagascar: An Analysis Using Household Data,” World Bank Economic Review, 13, 303–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandvakili, S. (1994): “Income Distribution and Redistribution through Taxation: An International Comparison,” Empirical Economics, 19, 473–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1995): “Decomposable Measures of Income Tax Progressivity,” Applied Economics, 27, 657–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandvakili, S. and J. Mills (2001): “The Distributional Implications of Tax and Transfer Programs in US,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 41, 167–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Measuring Progressivity and Vertical Equity. In: Poverty and Equity. Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33318-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics