Skip to main content

Estimating Poverty Lines

  • Chapter
Poverty and Equity

Part of the book series: Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being ((EIAP,volume 2))

  • 1003 Accesses

Abstract

Three major issues arise in the estimation and in the use of poverty lines. First, we must define the space in which well-being is to be measured. As discussed in Chapter 1, this can be the space of utility, incomes, “basic needs”, functionings, or capabilities. Second, we must determine whether we are interested in an absolute or in a relative poverty line in the space considered. Third, we must choose whether it is by someone’s “capacity to function” or by someone’s “actual functioning” that we will judge if that person is poor. We consider first the issue of the choice between an absolute and a relative poverty line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6.5 References

  • Barrington, L. (1997): “Estimating Earnings Poverty in 1939: A Comparison of Orshansky-Method and Price-Indexed Definitions of Poverty,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 406–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, M. (1998): “The Sensitivity of International Poverty Comparisons,” Review of Income and Wealth, 44, 449–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchplower, D. and A. Oswald (2000): “Well-Being Over Time in Britain and the USA,” Tech. Rep. 7487, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vos, K. and T. Garner (1991): “An Evaluation of Subjective Poverty Definitions: Comparing Results from the U.S. and the Netherlands,” Review of Income and Wealth, 37, 267–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vos, K. and A. Zaidi (1998): “Poverty Measurement in the European Union; Country-Specific or Union-Wide Poverty Lines?” Journal of Income Distribution, 8, 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. (1992): “The Development and History of the Poverty Thresholds,” Social Security Bulletin, 55, 3–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — (1995): “Is there Such a Thing as an Absolute Poverty Line Over Time? Evidence from the United States, Britain, Canada, and Australia on the Income Elasticity of the Poverty Line.” Poverty measurement working papers, US Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. (1998): “Absolute versus Relative Poverty,” American Economic Review, 88, 335–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennerster, H. (2000): “US poverty studies and poverty measurement: the past twenty-five years,” CASE paper 42, STICERD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedhart, T., V. Halberstadt, A. Kapteyn, and B. Van Praac. (1977): “The poverty line: concept and measurement,” Journal of Human Resources, XII, 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, J. and E. Thorbecke (1986): “A Methodology for Measuring Food Poverty Applied to Kenya,” Journal of Development Economics, 24, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, A. and B. Van Praag (1985): “A Synthesis of Poverty Line Definitions,” The Review of Income and Wealth, 31, 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, D. (2000); “Relative or Absolute Poverty Lines: A New Approach,” Review of Income and Wealth, 46, 181–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orshansky, M. (1988): “Counting the poor: another look at the poverty profile,” Social Security Bulletin, 51, 25–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, M. and M. Ravaluon (2000): “Measuring Poverty Using Qualitative Perceptions of Consumption Adequacy,” Review of Economics and Statistics. 82, 462–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (1998a): “Does Aggregation Hide the Harmful Effects of inequality on Growth?” Economics Letters, 61, 73–77.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — (1998b): “Poverty Lines in Theory and Practice,” LSMS Working Paper 133, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. and B. Bidani (1994): “How Robust Is a Poverty Profile?” World Bank Economic Review, 8, 75–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravaixion, M. and M. Lokshin (2002): “Self-Rated Economic Welfare in Russia,” European Economic Review, 46, 1453–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, T. and B. Bergmann (1993): “A Budget-Based Definition of Poverty: With an Application to Single-Parent Families,” Journal of Human Resources, 28, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovnik, T. (1992): “Perception of Poverty and Income Satisfaction: An Empirical Analysis of Slovene Households,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch, K., T. Callan, P. Estivill, P. Hausman, B. Jeandidier, R. Muffels, and J. Yfantopoulos (1993): “A Comparison of Poverty in Seven European Countries and Regions Using Subjective and Relative Measures,” Journal of Population Economics, 6, 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodon, Q. (1997a): “Food Energy Intake and Cost of Basic Needs: Measuring Poverty in Bangladesh,” Journal of Development Studies, 34, 66–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, B. (1994): “Can a Poverty Index Be Both Relative and Absolute?” Econometrica, 62, 1453–58.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Estimating Poverty Lines. In: Poverty and Equity. Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33318-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics