Skip to main content

An Overview of Industrial Screening Experiments

  • Chapter
Screening

Abstract

An overview of industrial screening experiments is presented, focusing on their applications in process and product design and development. Concepts and terminology that are used in later chapters are introduced and explained. Topics covered include a discussion of the general framework of industrial experimentation, the role in those activities played by screening experiments, and the use of two-level factorial and fractional factorial designs for screening. Aliasing in fractional factorial designs, regular and nonregular designs, design resolution, design projection, and the role of confirmation and follow-up experiments are discussed. A case study is presented on factor screening in a plasma etching process from semiconductor manufacturing, including a discussion of the regular fractional factorial design used and the analysis of the data from the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, B., Chipman, H., and Vijayan, K. (1999). Some risks in the construction and analysis of supersaturated designs. Technometrics, 41, 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, H. P. (1964). The role of statistics in setting food specifications. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Research Council of the American Meat Institute, 43–56. Reprinted in Experiments in Industry: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Results. Editors: R. D. Snee, L. B. Hare and J. R. Trout. American Society for Quality Control, Milwaukee, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. R. (1997). Pre-experiment planning for designed experiments: Graphical methods. Journal of Quality Technology, 29, 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. R. (1998). Design-plots for factorial and fractional factorial designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. R. (1999). Graphical Methods for the Design of Experiments, Springer Lecture Notes in Statistics 143. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisgaard, S. (1998–1999). Conditional inference chart for small unreplicated two-level factorial experiments. Quality Engineering, 11, 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, T., Petersen, B., and Trayser, D. (1982). Another look at the statistician’s role in experimental planning and design. The American Statistician, 36, 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. H. and Cox, D. R. (1962). Some systematic supersaturated designs. Technometrics, 4, 489–495.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Meyer, R. D. (1986). An analysis for unreplicated fractional factorials. Technometrics, 28, 11–18.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 13, 1–45.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, S. J. (1978). Statistics for Experimenters, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. E. and Montgomery, D. C. (1993). A systematic approach to planning for a designed industrial experiment (with discussion). Technometrics, 35, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Design-Expert Software. Version 6 User’s Guide (2000). Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, G. J. (1977). Some things engineers should know about experimental design. Journal of Quality Technology, 9, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, G. J. (1984). Experimental design in a complex world. Technometrics, 26, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamada, M. and Balakrishnan, N. (1998). Analyzing unreplicated factorial experiments: A review with some new proposals (with discussion). Statistica Sinica, 8, 1–41.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hamada, M. and Wu, C. F. J. (1992). Analysis of designed experiments with complex aliasing. Journal of Quality Technology, 24, 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, D. R., Montgomery, D. C., and Carlyle, W. M. (2003). Analysis of supersaturated designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 35, 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuri, A. I. and Cornell, J. A. (1996). Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses, second edition. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenth, R. V. (1989). Quick and easy analysis of unreplicated factorials. Technometrics, 31, 469–473.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. and Mee, R. W. (2002). Better foldover fractions for resolution III 2k–p designs. Technometrics, 44, 278–283.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. and Lin, D. K. J. (2003). Optimal foldover plans for two-level fractional factorial designs. Technometrics, 45, 142–149.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D. K. J. (2000). Recent developments in supersaturated designs, Chapter 18. In Statistical Process Monitoring and Optimization. Editors: S. H. Park and G. G. Vining, pages 305–319. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mee, R.W. and Peralta, M. (2000). Semifolding 2k–p designs. Technometrics, 42, 122–134.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C. (2005). Design and Analysis of Experiments, sixth edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C. (1996). Foldovers of 2k–p resolution IV designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 446–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. (2002). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments, second edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. J., Montgomery, D. C., Elias, R. J., and Maass, E. (2000). Acomparison of several design augmentation strategies. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 16, 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plackett, R. L. and Burman, J. P. (1946). The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika, 33, 305–325.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Montgomery, D.C., Jennings, C.L. (2006). An Overview of Industrial Screening Experiments. In: Dean, A., Lewis, S. (eds) Screening. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28014-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics