Skip to main content

The Cognitive Unconscious

Recalling the History of the Concept and the Problem

  • Chapter
Activity and Sign
  • 1186 Accesses

Abstract

For a long time the cognitive unconscious was a marginal subject in the epistemology and psychology of the 20th century. In the last decades, however, this situation has dramatically changed under the influence of cognitive psychology and cognitive science. As a contribution to a better understanding of this change, its reasons, and its perspectives, this article tries to recall the history of the cognitive unconscious as a philosophical and psychological concept that does not begin with the rise of cognitive psychology and cognitive science. It links the concept to the philosphical criticism of Descartes and Kant as the most eminent proponents of a philosophy of consciousness. In particular, it links the concept to American pragmatism. By anchoring consciousness in practical and sign-mediated intersubjectivity, Peirce, Dewey, and Mead, at the same time laid the foundations for a pioneering conception of the cognitive unconscious that requires further elaboration and remains a stimulating challenge for current philosophical and psychological research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, H. (1988). Fundus Animae — der Grund der Seele. Zur Gnoseologie des Dunklen in der Aufklärung. DVjs 62, 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K. O. (1973). Von Kant zu Peirce: Die semiotiche Transformation der Transzendentalen Logik. In: Ders.: Transformation der Philosophie Bd. II. Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft. Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K. O. (1975). Der Denkweg von Charles S. Peirce. Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1975). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution and Epistemology. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarten, A. G. (1988) (1750/1758). Theoretische Ästhetik. Die grundlegenden Abschnitte aus der “Aesthetica.” Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäumler, A. (1967) (1923). Das Irrationalitätsproblem in der Ästhetik und Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft. Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucci, W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Science. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, M. (1993). The Psychoanalytic Mind-From Freud to Philosophy. Cambridge/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1982). Paradoxes of Irrationality. In: R. Wollheim & J. Hopkins (Eds.): Philosophical Essays on Freud. New York/Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1985). Incoherence and Irrationality. Dialectica 39, 245–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1922) (1988). Human Nature and Conduct. The Middle Works, Vol. 14. Carbondale/Edwardsville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934) (1988). Art as Experience. The Later Works, Vol. 10. Carbondale/Edwardsville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagle, M. N. (1984). Recent Developments in Psychoanalysis. A Critical Evaluation. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberger, H. E. (1970). The Discovery of the Unconscious. The History and Evolution of Dynmamic Psychiatry. New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. v. (1894). Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. v. (1921). Die Tatsachen in der Wahrnehmung. In: Ders.: Schriften zur Erkenntnistheorie. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. (Ed.) (1967). Motives and Thought. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser-El-Safti, M. (1987). Der Nachdenker. Die Entstehung der Metapsychologie Freuds in Hirer Abhängigkeit von Schopenhauer und Nietzsche. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). The Cognitive Unconscious. Science 237, 1445–1452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Schneider, H. & Pfeifer, R. (Eds.), 1992: “Two Butterflies on My Head …” Psychoanalysis in the Interdisciplinary Scientific Dialogue. Berlin/Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzer, A. (1972). Kritik despsychoanalytischen Symbolbegriffs. Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzer, A. (1977). Sprachspiel und Interaktionsformen. Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzer, A. (1981). Das Konzil der Buchhalter. Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütkehaus, L. (Ed.) (1995). Tiefenphilosophie. Texte zur Entdeckung des Unbewussten vor Freud. Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquard, O. (1987). Transzendentaler ldealismus, Romantische Naturphilosophie, Psychoanalyse. Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matte-Bianco, I. (1975). The unconscious as infinite sets. An essay in bilogic. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, J. (1979). Two semantic forms: Neuropsychological and psychoanalytic descriptions. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 2, 25–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1930). Cooley’s Contribution to American Social Thought. The American Journal of Sociology XXXV, 693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mies, Th./ Brandes, H. (1999). Unbewußte, das. In: H. J. Sandkühler: Enzyklopädie Philosophie Bd. 2. Hamburg, 1657–1665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, Th./ Scholz, R. (2001). Die Theorie des Unbewussten in Psychoanalyse und Gruppenanalyse. Arbeitshefte Gruppenanalyse 16, 24–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears, D., 1984: Motivated Irrationality. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, U. & Zeppelin, I. v. (Eds.) (1991). Cognitve-Affective Processes. New Ways of Psychoanalytic Modeling. Berlin/Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce (CP) (1992). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Volumes I–VI, ed. by Charles Harts-horne and Paul Weiss, 1931–1935, Volumes VII–VIII, ed. by Arthur W. Burks, 1958, quotations according to volume and paragraph). Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce (RLT). Ch. S. Peirce, Reasoning and the Logic of Things (The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898). Ed. by K.L. Ketner. Cambridge/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrig, W. J., Wippich, W. Perrig-Chiello, P. (1993). Unbewusste Informationsverarbeitung. Bern/Göttingen/Toronto/Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, R. & Scheier, V. (1999). Understanding Intelligence. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevrin, H., Bond, J. A., Brakel, L. A. W., Hertel, R. K. & Williams, W. J. (1996). Conscious and Unconscious Processes. Psychodynamic, Cognitive, and Neurophysiological Convergences. New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulloway, F. J. (1979). Freud, Biologist of the Mind. Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend. New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mies, T. (2005). The Cognitive Unconscious. In: Hoffmann, M.H., Lenhard, J., Seeger, F. (eds) Activity and Sign. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics