Abstract
This paper suggests that the first BaCoMET [Basic Components of Mathematics Education for Teachers] project (Christiansen, Howson and Otte 1986) can be seen as an important early attempt to sketch a ‘disciplinary matrix’ (Kuhn 1962, 1970) for the field of mathematics education. This project brought together representatives of different national traditions of research in mathematics education, with the aim of identifying fundamental ideas which should be given high priority in any teacher education programme. My analysis of the project draws on Kuhn’s (1970) prioritisation of different senses of ‘paradigm’ in relation to the development of ‘normal science’, and consequently draws out the central part played by clusters of exemplary problems (and solutions) in mediating between symbolic generalisations and practical action.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adda, J. (1988). Review of B. Christiansen, G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.) (1986). Perspectives on Mathematics Education. Educational Studies in Mathematics 19(1), 105–108.
Booker, G. (1988). Review of B. Christiansen, G. Howson and M. Otte (Eds.) (1986). Perspectives on Mathematics Education. Educational Studies in Mathematics 19(4), 503–510.
Christiansen, B., & H. G. Steiner (Eds.) (1979). New Trends in Mathematics Teaching IV. Paris: UNESCO.
Christiansen, B., G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.) (1986). Perspectives on Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Ernest, P. (1998). A postmodern perspective on research in mathematics education. In A. Sierpinska, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics Education as a Research Domain: A Search for Identity. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 71–85.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962, 1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. First and Second Editions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Otte, M. (1979). The education and professional life of mathematics teachers. In B. Christiansen, & H. G. Steiner (Eds.), New Trends in Mathematics Teaching IV. Paris: UNESCO, 107–133.
Ruthven, K. et al. (2002). Reflections on Educational Studies in Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 50(3), 251–257.
Schwarzenberger, R. (1987). Review of B. Christiansen, G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.) (1986) Perspectives on Mathematics Education. Mathematical Gazette 71(455), 67–68.
Sierpinsca, A., & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.) (1998). Mathematics Education as a Research Domain: A Search for Identity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruthven, K. (2005). Towards a Normal Science of Mathematics Education?. In: Hoffmann, M.H., Lenhard, J., Seeger, F. (eds) Activity and Sign. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24270-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24269-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-24270-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)