Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
4.7 References
ATC-13 (1985). Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
Browner, C. (1995). “Guidance for Risk Characterization,” Environmental Protection Agency, February.
Budnitz, R.J., Apostolakis, G., Boore, D.M., Cluff, L.S., Coppersmith, K.J., Cornell, C.A., and Morris, P.A. (1997). Recommendations for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts, Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee, NUREG/CR-6372, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
Dalkey, N.C. (1969). The Delphi Method. Rand Corporation: Santa Monica, California.
EERI (2003). World Housing Encyclopedia, <http://www.world-housing.net/>.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997). FEMA 303 — NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, 1997 Edition, Developed by The Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology (2001).
Frankel, A., Mueller, C., Barnhard, T., Perkins, D., Leyendecker, E.V., Dickman, N., Hanson, S., and Hopper, M. (1996). National Seismic Hazards Maps: Documentation, June 1996, USGS Open-File Report 96-532: United States Geological Survey.
Grossi, P., Kleindorfer, P., and Kunreuther, H. (1999). “The Impact of Uncertainty in Managing Seismic Risk: The Case of Earthquake Frequency and Structural Vulnerability,” Risk Management and Decision Processes Working Paper 99-03-26, Department of Operations and Information Management, The Wharton School.
Grossi, P. (2000). Quantifying the Uncertainty in Seismic Risk and Loss Estimation. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Grossi, P. and Windeler, D. (2000). “Sensitivity analysis of earthquake risk in the Charleston, South Carolina region,” EERI’s Sixth International Conference on Seismic Zonation, November 12–15, 2000.
Hanks, T.C. and C. A. Cornell (1994). “Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: A Beginner’s Guide.” Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Current Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping, I/1-1 to I/-17, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C.
Inman, R.L. and Conover, W.J (1980). “Small Sample Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models, with an Application to Risk Assessment,” Communications in Statistics, Part A. Theory and Methods, 17: 1749–1842.
NIBS (1997). HAZUS: Hazards U.S.: Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology. NIBS Document Number 5200: National Institute of Building Sciences.
Peterson, M.D., Bryant, W.A., Cramer, C.H., Cao, T., Reichle, M.S., Frankel, A.D., Lienkaemper, J.L., McCrory, P.A., and D.P. Schwartz (1996). Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California, USGS Open-File Report 96–706: United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California.
Powell, M.D. and Aberson, S.D. (2001). “Accuracy of United States Tropical Cyclone Landfall Forecasts in the Atlantic Basin (1976-2000).” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 82(12): 2749–2767.
Richter, C.F. (1958). Elementary Seismology. W.H. Freeman and Company: San Francisco, California.
Toro, G.R., Abrahamson, N., and Schneider, J. (1997). “Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in the Central and Eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties,” Seismological Research Letters 68: 41–57.
Youngs, R.R., and K.J. Coppersmith (1985). “Implications of Fault Slip Rates and Earthquake Recurrence Models to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Estimates.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75(4): 939–964.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grossi, P., Windeler, D. (2005). Sources, Nature, and Impact of Uncertainties on Catastrophe Modeling. In: Grossi, P., Kunreuther, H. (eds) Catastrophe Modeling: A New Approach to Managing Risk. Catastrophe Modeling, vol 25. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23129-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23129-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-23082-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-23129-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)