Abstract
The claim that the World Trade Organization is “undemocratic” starts from a basic fallacy. The WTO is not imposed on countries. Countries choose to belong to the WTO. No one is told to join. No one is forced to sign our agreements. Each and every one of the WTO’s rules is negotiated by Member governments, agreed by consensus, and ratified by parliaments. Countries choose to participate in an open, rules-based multilateral trading system for the simple reason that it is overwhelmingly in their interest to do so. The alternative is a less open, less prosperous, more uncertain world economy—an option few countries would willingly choose. It is difficult to conceive of a system that could be more democratic.
Mike Moore was Director-General of the World Trade Organization from 1999 to 2002. He has served as New Zealand Minister of Overseas Trade and Marketing (1984–1990), Minister of Foreign Affairs (1990), Deputy Minister of Finance (1988–1990) and Prime Minister (1990).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Members make decisions through numerous councils and committees, whose membership consists of all WTO members. Topmost is the ministerial conference, which has to meet at least once every two years. Since 1994, ministers have met in Singapore (1996), Switzerland (1998), the United States (1999), Qatar (2001) and Mexico (2003).
Jeffrey J. Schott, Institute for International Economics, Washington, quoted in WTO, Trading into the Future (April, 1999), at 63.
Claude E. Barfield, Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy 4 (2001).
Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and the World Trade Organization: Problems of Democratic Legitimacy, quoted in Barfield, supra note 10, at 100.
Martin Wolf, Will the Nation States Survive Globalization?, 80 Foreign Affairs 178, 189 (January/February 2001).
Steve Charnovitz, Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in the World Trade Organization, 17(1) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 331 (1996).
Martin Wolf, Uncivil Society: The Ill-Fated Multilateral Agreement on Investment Shows the Need to Confront the Claims of Pressure Groups Hostile to Globalisation, Financial Times, September 1, 1999, at 14.
UNDP, Human Development Report at 2 (1997).
World Democracy Forum (2001).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moore, M. (2005). The Democratic Roots of the World Trade Organization. In: Macrory, P.F.J., Appleton, A.E., Plummer, M.G. (eds) The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22688-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22688-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-22685-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22688-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)