Skip to main content

Understanding Landscape Metrics I

  • Chapter
Learning Landscape Ecology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Baker, William L., and Y. Cai. 1992. The r.le programs for multi-scale analysis of landscape structure using the GRASS geographical information system. Landscape Ecology 7:291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. H., B. T. Milne, M. G. Turner, and R. V. O’Neill. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1:19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E. J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143–156. A synthetic overview of the ways in which landscape pattern is quantified, emphasizing conceptual issues and arguing for complementary use of patch-based measures and approaches from spatial statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E. J., and G. R. Parker. 1992. Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape Ecology 7:101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young, R., and M. CHOPPING. 1996. Quantifying landscape structure: A review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography 20:418–445. A good review that includes examples of how different landscape metrics are used in questions associated with forested landscapes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargis, C. D., J. A., Bissonnette, and J. L. David. 1998. The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 13:167–186. Hargis et al. examine whether commonly used landscape metrics can distinguish between landscapes that are fragmented and those that are not. This paper can provide a useful basis for a discussion of the behavior of landscape metrics.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., and J. F. Reynolds. 1993. A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8:155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., and J. F. Reynolds. 1994. A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology 75:2446–2455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., and J. F. Reynolds. 1995. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73:280–284. An excellent discussion of what is meant by heterogeneity; it should be read by all those beginning to consider the causes or consequences of spatial pattern.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K., and B. J. Marks. 1995. Fragstats: Spatial analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNWGTR-351. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. V., J. R. Krummel, R. H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, B. Jackson, D. L. Deangelis, B. T. Milne, M. G. Turner, B. Zygmunt, S. Christensen, V. H. Dale, AND R. L Graham. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1:153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C. 1975. Ecological Diversity. Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riitters, K. H., R. V. O’Neill, C. T. Hunsaker, J. D. Wickham, D. H. Yankee, S. P. Timmons, K. B. Jones, and B. L. Jackson. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10:23–40. Provides the first comprehensive analysis of a wide range of landscape metrics, demonstrating how strongly many of the metrics are correlated and identifying five independent aspects of pattern.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters, K. H., R. V. O’Neill, J. D. Wickham, and K. B. Jones. 1996. A note on contagion indices for landscape analysis. Landscape Ecology 11:197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romme, W. H. 1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Monographs 52:199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme, W. H., and D. H. Knight. 1982. Landscape diversity: The concept applied to Yellowstone Park. BioScience 32:664–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., R. Costanza, and F. H. Sklar. 1989. Methods to compare spatial patterns for landscape modeling and analysis. Ecological Modelling 48:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., R. H. Gardner, and R. V. O’Neill. Pattern and Process: Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag, New York, Chapter 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, J. D., and D. J. Norton. 1994. Mapping and analyzing landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology 9:7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, J. D., and K. H. Riitters. 1995. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. International Journal of Remote Sensing 16:3585–3594.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cardille, J.A., Turner, M.G. (2002). Understanding Landscape Metrics I. In: Gergel, S.E., Turner, M.G. (eds) Learning Landscape Ecology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21613-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21613-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95254-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21613-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics