Abstract
Simulations of future climate using general circulation models (GCMs) suggest that rising concentrations of greenhouse gases may have significant consequences for the global climate. Of less certainty is the extent to which regional scale (i.e., sub-GCM grid) environmental processes will be affected. In this chapter, a range of downscaling techniques are critiqued. Then a relatively simple (yet robust) statistical downscaling technique and its use in the modelling of future runoff scenarios for three river basins in the Sierra Nevada, California, is described. This region was selected because GCM experiments driven by combined greenhouse-gas and sulphate-aerosol forcings consistently show major changes in the hydro-climate of the southwest United States by the end of the 21st century.
The regression-based downscaling method was used to simulate daily rainfall and temperature series for streamflow modelling in three Californian river basins under current-and future-climate conditions. The downscaling involved just three predictor variables (specific humidity, zonal velocity component of airflow, and 500 hPa geopotential heights) supplied by the U.K. Meteorological Office couple ocean-atmosphere model (HadCM2) for the grid point nearest the target basins. When evaluated using independent data, the model showed reasonable skill at reproducing observed area-average precipitation, temperature, and concomitant streamflow variations. Overall, the downscaled data resulted in slight underestimates of mean annual streamflow due to underestimates of precipitation in spring and positive temperature biases in winter.
Differences in the skill of simulated streamflows amongst the three basins were attributed to the smoothing effects of snowpack on streamflow responses to climate forcing. The Merced and American River basins drain the western, windward slope of the Sierra Nevada and are snowmelt dominated, whereas the Carson River drains the eastern, leeward slope and is a mix of rainfall runoff and snowmelt runoff. Simulated streamflow in the American River responds rapidly and sensitively to daily-scale temperature and precipitation fluctuations and errors; in the Merced and Carson Rivers, the response to the same short-term influences is much less. Consequently, the skill of simulated flows was significantly lower in the American River model than in the Carson and Merced.
The physiography of the three basins also accounts for differences in their sensitivities to future climate change. Increases in winter precipitation exceeding +100% coupled with mean temperature rises greater than +2°C result in increased winter streamflows in all three basins. In the Merced and Carson basins, these streamflow increases reflect large changes in winter snowpack, whereas the streamflow changes in the lower elevation American basin are driven primarily by rainfall runoff. Furthermore, reductions in winter snowpack in the American River basin, owing to less precipitation falling as snow and earlier melting of snow at middle elevations, lead to less spring and summer streamflow.
Taken collectively, the downscaling results suggest significant changes to both the timing and magnitude of streamflows in the Sierra Nevada by the end of the 21st Century. In the higher elevation basins, the HadCM2 scenario implies more annual streamflow and more streamflow during the spring and summer months that are critical for water-resources management in California. Depending on the relative significance of rainfall runoff and snowmelt, each basin responds in its own way to regional climate forcing. Generally, then, climate scenarios need to be specified — by whatever means — with sufficient temporal and spatial resolution to capture subtle orographic influences if projections of climate-change responses are to be useful and reproducible.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aguado, E. (1985). Radiation balances of melting snow covers at an open site in the central Sierra Nevada, California. Water Resources Research, 21, 1649–1654.
Bardossy, A. and Plate, E.J. (1992). Space-time model for daily rainfall using atmospheric circulation patterns. Water Resources Research, 28, 1247–1259.
Boer, G.J., Flato, G.M. and Ramsden, D. (1999a). A transient climate change simulation with historical and projected greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing: projected climate for the 21st century. Climate Dynamics, submitted.
Boer, G.J., Flato, G.M., Reader, M.C. and Ramsden, D. (1999b). A transient climate change simulation with historical and projected greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing: experimental design and comparison with the instrumental record for the 20th century. Climate Dynamics, submitted.
Christensen, J.H., Machenhauer, B., Jones, R.G., Schär, C., Ruti, P.M., Castro, M., Visconti, G. (1997). Validation of present-day regional climate simulations over Europe: LAM simulations with observed boundary conditions. Climate Dynamics, 13, 489–506.
Conway, D., Wilby, R.L. and Jones, P.D. (1996). Precipitation and air flow indices over the British Isles. Climate Research, 7, 169–183.
Crane, R.G. and Hewitson, B.C. (1998). Doubled CO2 precipitation changes for the Susquehanna basin: downscaling from the GENESIS General Circulation Model. International Journal of Climatology, 18, 65–76.
Dettinger, M.D., and Cayan, D.R., (1992), Climate-change scenarios for the Sierra Nevada, California, based on winter atmospheric-circulation patterns: Proceedings, 1992 American Water Resources Association Symposium and Conference, “Managing Water Resources under Global Change,” Reno, Nevada, 681–690.
Dettinger, M.D., Mo, K., Cayan, D.R., and Jeton, A.E. (1999). Global to local scale simulations of streamflow in the Merced, American, and Carson Rivers, Sierra Nevada, California: Preprints, American Meteorological Society’s 14th Conference on Hydrology, Dallas, January 1999, 80–82.
Felzer, B. (1999). Hydrological implications of GCM results for the U.S. National Assessment. Proceedings of the Speciality Conference on Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change to Water Resources of the United States, American Water Resources Association, Atlanta, USA, 69–72.
Flato, G.M., Boer, G.J., Lee, W.G., McFarlane, N.A., Ramsden, D., Reader, M.C. and Weaver, A.J. (1999). The Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis Global Coupled Model and its climate. Climate Dynamics, submitted.
Giorgi, F. and Mearns, L.O. (1991). Approaches to the simulation of regional climate change. A review. Rev. Geophys., 29, 191–216.
Giorgi, F. and Mearns, L.O. (1999). Introduction to special section: Regional climate modelling revisited. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, 6335–6352.
Goodess, C.M. and Palutikof, J.P. (1998). Development of daily rainfall scenarios for southeast Spain using a circulation-type approach to downscaling. International Journal of Climatology, 10, 1051–1083.
Gregory, J.M., Wigley, T.M.L. and Jones, P.D. (1993). Application of Markov models to area-average daily precipitation series and interannual variability in seasonal totals. Climate Dynamics, 8, 299–310.
Hay, L.E., McCabe, G.J., Wolock, D.M. and Ayers, M.A. (1991). Simulation of precipitation by weather type analysis. Water Resources Research, 27, 493–501.
Hay, L.E., McCabe, G.J., Wolock, D.M. and Ayers, M.A. (1992). Use of weather types to disaggregate General Circulation Model predictions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 2781–2790.
Hostetler, S.W. (1994). Hydrologi cand atmospheric models: the (continuing) problem of discordant scales. Climatic Change, 27, 345–350.
Jeton, A.E. and Smith, J.L. (1993). Development of watershed models for two Sierra Nevada basins using a geographic information system. Water Resources Bulletin, 29, 923–932.
Jeton, A.E., Dettinger, M.D., and Smith, J.L. (1996). Potential effects of climate change on streamflow, eastern and western slopes of the Sierra Nevada, California and Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95–4260, 44 p.
Johns, T.C., Carnell, R.E., Crossley, J.F., Gregory, J.M., Mitchell, J.F.B., Senior, C.A., Tett, S.F.B. and Wood, R.A. (1997). The Second Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: Model description, spinup and validation. Climate Dynamics, 13, 103–134.
Jones, P.D., Hulme, M. and Briffa, K.R. (1993). A comparison of Lamb Circulation Types with an objective classification scheme. International Journal of Climatology, 13, 655–663.
Jones, R.G., Murphy, J.M. and Noguer, M. (1995). Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional-climate model. I: Assessment of control climate, including sensitivity to location of lateral boundaries. J. Roy. Met. Soc., 121, 1413–1449.
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Sana, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K.C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R. and Joseph, D. (1996). The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 77, 437–471.
Karl, T.R., Wang, W.C., Schlesinger, M.E., Knight, R.W. and Portman, D. (1990). A method of relating General Circulation Model simulated climate to the observed local climate. Part I: Seasonal statistics. Journal of Climate, 3, 1053–1079.
Katz, R.W. (1996). Use of conditional stochastic models to generate climate change scenarios. Climatic Change, 32, 237–255.
Kilsby, C.G., Cowpertwait, P.S.P., O’Connell, P.E. and Jones, P.D. (1998). Predicting rainfall statistics in England and Wales using atmospheric circulation variables. Internationaljournal of Climatology, 18, 523–539.
Leavesley, G.H., Lichty, R.W., Troutman, B.M. and Saindon, L.G. (1983). Precipitation-runoff modelling system: User’s manual. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 83–4238, 207 p.
Matyasovszky, I., Bogardi, I. and Duckstein, L. (1994). Comparison of two GCMs to downscale local precipitation and temperature. Water Resources Research, 30, 3437–3448.
McGregor, J.J. (1997). Regional climate modelling. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 63, 105–117.
Mearns, L.O., Rosenzweig, C. and Goldberg, R. (1996). The effect of changes in daily and interannual climatic variability on CERES-wheat yields. A sensitivity study. Climatic Change, 32, 257–292.
Mitchell, J.F.B. and Johns, T.C. (1997). On modification of global warming by sulphate aerosols. Journal of Climate, 10, 245–267.
Obled, C. and Rosse, B.B. (1977). Mathematical models of a melting snowpack at an index plot. J. Hydrology, 32, 139–163.
Pilling, C., Wilby, R.L. and Jones, J.A.A. (1998). Downscaling of catchment hydrometeorology from GCM output using airflow indices in upland Wales. In: Wheater, H. and Kirby, C. Hydrology in a Changing Environment, Vol.1, Wiley, Chichester, 191–208.
Richards, J.M. (1971). Simple expression for the saturation vapour pressure of water in the range -50° to 140°. Brit. J., Appl. Phys., 4, L15–L18.
Richardson, C.W. (1981). Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature and solar radiation. Water Resources Research, 17, 182–190.
Smith, J.L. and Reece, B.D. (1995). Watershed characterization for precipitation runoff modelling system, North Fork American River and East Fork Carson River watersheds, California. U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA-734, 1 sheet.
von Storch, H., Zorita, E. and Cubasch, U. (1993). Downscaling of global climate change estimates to regional scales: an application to Iberian rainfall in wintertime. J. Climate, 6, 1161–1171.
Wigley, T.M.L. (1999). The science of climate change: global and U.S. perspectives. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, Virginia, 48 pp.
Wilby, R.L. (1997). Nonstationarity in daily precipitation series: implications for GCM downscaling using atmospheric circulation indices. International Journal of Climatology, 17, 439–454.
Wilby, R.L. and Wigley, T.M.L. (1997). Downscaling General Circulation Model output: a review of methods and limitations. Progress in Physical Geography, 21, 530–548.
Wilby, R.L., Hassan, H. and Hanaki, K. (1998a). Statistical downscaling of hydrometeorological variables using general circulation model output. Journal of Hydrology, 205, 1–19.
Wilby, R.L., Wigley, T.M.L., Conway, D., Jones, P.D., Hewitson, B.C., Main, J., and Wilks, D.S. (1998b). Statistical downscaling of General Circulation Model output: a comparison of methods. Water Resources Research, 34, 2995–3008.
Wilby, R.L., Hay, L.E. and Leavesley, G.H. (1999). A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin, Colorado. Journal of Hydrology, submitted.
Wilks, D.S. (1992). Adapting stochastic weather generation algorithms for climate change studies. Climatic Change, 22, 67–84.
Willen, D.W., Shumway, C.A., and Reid, J.E. (1971). Simulation of daily snow water equivalent and melt. Proceedings of the 1971 Western Snow Conference, Billings, Montana, v. 39, 1–8.
Winkler, J.A., Palutikof, J.P., Andresen, J.A. and Goodess, C.M. (1997). The simulation of daily temperature series from GCM output. Part II: Sensitivity analysis of an empirical transfer function methodology. Journal of Climate, 10, 2514–2532.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilby, R.L., Dettinger, M.D. (2000). Streamflow Changes in the Sierra Nevada, California, Simulated Using a Statistically Downscaled General Circulation Model Scenario of Climate Change. In: McLaren, S.J., Kniveton, D.R. (eds) Linking Climate Change to Land Surface Change. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48086-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48086-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5589-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48086-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive