This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Atwood, Margaret (2002). Negotiating with the dead: A writer on writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Balsamo, A. (2000a). Engineering cultural studies: The postdisciplinary adventures of mindplayers, fools and others. In D. Reid & S. Traweek (Eds.), Doing science + culture (pp. 259–274). New York: Routledge.
Balsamo, A. (2000b). Teaching in the belly of the beast: Feminism in the best of all places. In J. Marchessault & K. Sawchuk (Eds.), Wild science: Reading feminism, medicine and the media (pp. 185–214). New York: Routledge.
Bayer, B. M. (1995). Life part way in, part way out. History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin, 7, 36–40.
Bayer, B. M. (1997). Reenchanting constructionist inquiries. In B. M. Bayer & J. Shotter (Eds), Reconstructing the psychological subject (pp. 1–20). London: Sage.
Bayer, B.M. (2002). Critical contact: Psychology, the subject, and subjectivity. Feminism & psychology, 12(4), 455–461.
Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (2001). American psychology’s struggles with its curriculum: Should a thousand flowers bloom? American Psychologist, 56, 735–742.
Bonnell, V. E. & Hunt L. (Eds). (1999). Beyond the cultural turn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Buss, A. (Ed.). (1979). Psychology in social context. New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Danziger, K. (1992). In praise of marginality. Paper presented at the meeting of Cheiron-Europe, Groningen University, Netherlands.
Danziger, K. (1994). Does the history of psychology have a future? Theory and Psychology, 4(4), 467–484.
Dinnerstein, D. (1976). The mermaid and the minotaur: Sexual arrangements and human malaise. New York: Harper & Row.
Edwards, P. N. (1996). The closed world: Computers and the politics of discourse in cold war America. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage Books.
Fuchs, A. H. & Viney, W. (2002). The course in the history of psychology: Present status and future concerns. History of Psychology, 5, 3–15.
Furumoto, L. (1988). Shared knowledge: The experimentalists, 1904–1929. In J. G. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in psychology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Furumoto, L. (1989). The new history of psychology. In I. Cohen (Ed.), The G. Stanley Hall Lecture Series. (Vol. 9). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
Garber, M. (1998). Symptoms of culture. New York: Routledge.
Garber, M. (2001). Academic instincts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gergen, K. (2001). Psychological science in a postmodern context. American Psychologist, 56, 803–813.
Ginoria, A. B. (2001). Proud to be an oxymoron! From schizophrenic to (un)disciplined practice. In M. Mayberry, B. Subramaniam & L. W. Weasel (Eds.), Feminist science studies: A new generation (pp. 14–21). New York: Routledge.
Golinski, J. (1998). Making natural knowledge: Constructivism and the history of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grosz, E. (1993). Bodies and knowledges: feminism and the crisis of reason. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 187–215). New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_witness@second_millennium. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (2000). How like a leaf: An interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York: Routledge.
Harding, S. & Hintikka, M. B. (Eds). (1983). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. Boston: Reidel.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hayles, K. (1999).How we became posthuman:Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Henriques, J., H., W., Urwin, C., Venn, C. & Walkerdine, V. (1984/1998). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Routledge.
Herman, E. (1995). The romance of American psychology: Political culture in the age of experts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Herschberger, R. (1948). Adam’s rib. New York: Pellegrini and Cudahy.
Iggers, Georg, G. (1997). Historiography in the twentieth century. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
Israel, J. (1979). From level of aspiration to dissonance. In A. R. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context. New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Keller, E. F. (1992). The paradox of scientific subjectivity. Annals of Scholarship, 9, 135–53.
Kitzinger, C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. London: Sage.
MacIntyre, A. (1985). How psychology makes itself true—or false. In Sigmund Koch & David E. Leary (Eds), A century of psychology as science (pp. 897–903). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mayberry, M., Subramaniam, B. & Weasel, L. W. (Eds.) (2001). Feminist science studies: A new generation. New York: Routledge.
McDonald, T. J. (1996). Introduction. In T. J. McDonald (Ed.), The historic turn in the human sciences (pp. 1–14). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Megill, A. (1991). Introduction: Four senses of objectivity. Annals of Scholarship, 8: 301–319.
Morawski, J. G. (1988). The rise of experimentation in psychology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Morawski, J. G. (1992). Self-regard and other-regard: Reflexive practices in American psychology, 1890–1940. Science in Context, 5, 281–308.
Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pandora, K. (1997). Rebels within the ranks: Psychologists’ critique of scientific authority and democratic realities in new deal America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pfister, J. (1999a). On conceptualizing the cultural history of emotional and psychological life in America. In J. Pfister & N. Schnog (Eds), Inventing the psychological (pp. 17–59). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Pfister, J. (1999b). Glamorizing the psychological: The politics of the performances of modern psychological identities. In J. Pfister & N. Schnog (Eds), Inventing the psychological (pp. 167–213). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Picart, C. J. S. (2001). Through the lens of an insider-outsider: Gender, race, and (self-) representation in science. In M. Mayberry, B. Subramaniam & L. W. Weasel (Eds.), Feminist science studies: A. new generation (pp. 42–47). New York: Routledge.
Richards, G. (1987). Of what is history of psychology a history? British Journal for the History of Science, 20, 201–211.
Richards, G. (1997). ‘Race’, racism and psychology: Towards a reflexive history. London: Routledge.
Richards, G. (2002). The psychology of psychology: A historically grounded sketch. Theory & Psychology, 12(1), 7–36.
Rosenzweig, S. (1933). The Experimental Situation as a Psychological Problem. Psychological Review, 40, 337–354.
Samelson, F. (1974). History, origin myth and ideology: ‘Discovery’ of social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 4(2): 217–231.
Samelson, F. (1978). From ‘race psychology’ to’ studies in prejudice:’ Some observations on the thematic reversal in (social) psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14: 265–278.
Sherif, C. W. (1976). Orientation in social psychology. New York: Harper & Row.
Smith, R. (1988). Does the history of psychology have a subject? History of the Human Sciences, 1(2), 147–177.
Smith, R. (1997). The Norton history of the human sciences. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Snitow, A. (1989). A gender diary. In A. Harris & Y. King (Eds.), Rocking the ship of state: Toward a feminist peace politics (pp. 35–74). Boulder: Westview Press.
Steinberg, M. P. (1996). Cultural history and cultural studies. In C. Nelson & D. P. Gaonkar (Eds.), Disciplinarity and dissent in cultural studies (pp. 103–129). New York: Routledge.
Traweek, S. (2000). Faultlines. In D. Reid & S. Traweek (Eds.), Doing science + culture (pp. 21–48). New York: Routledge.
Weisstein, N. (1971). Psychology constructs the female. In V. Gornick & B. K. Moran (Eds.), Women in sexist society: Studies in power and powerlessness (pp. 207–224). NY: New American Library.
White, H. (1999). Afterword. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn (pp. 315–324). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bayer, B.M. (2005). On Cultural History as Transformation—Or, What’s the Matter with Psychology Anyway?. In: Brock, A.C., Louw, J., van Hoorn, W. (eds) Rediscovering the History of Psychology. History and Philosophy of Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48031-X_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48031-X_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47906-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48031-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)