This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baker, F. B. (1992). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques. New York: Dekker.
Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., & Williams, E. A. (1985). Appropriateness measurement with polychotomous item response models and standardized indices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 38, 67–86.
Glas, C. A. W., Meijer, R. R., & van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A. (1998). Statistical tests for person misfit in computerized adaptive testing (Reseach Report RR 98-01). Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Jannarone, R. J. (1986). Conjunctive item response theory kernels. Psychometrika 51, 357–373.
Klauer, K. C. (1991). An exact and optimal standardized person test for assessing consistency with the Rasch model. Psychometrika 56, 213–228.
Klauer, K. C. (1995). The assessment of person fit. In G. F. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.): Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 97–110). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Klauer, K. C. & Rettig, K. (1990). An approximately standardized person test for assessing consistency with a latent traitmodel. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 193–206
Levine, M. V., & Drasgow, F. (1988). Optimal appropriateness measurement. Psychometrika 53, 161–176.
Levine, M. V., & Rubin, D. B. (1979). Measuring the appropriateness of multiplechoice test scores. Journal of Educational Statistics 4, 269–290.
McLeod, L. D., & Lewis, C. (1998, April). A Baytsian approach to detection of item preknowledge in a CAT. San Diego, CA: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education.
Meijer, R. R., Molenaar, I. W., & Sijtsma, K. (1994). Item, test, person and group characteristics and their influence on nonparametric appropriateness measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement 18, 111–120.
Meijer, R. R., & Sijtsma, K. (1995). Detection of aberrant item score patterns: a review of recent developments. Applied Measurement in Education 8, 261–272.
Molenaar, I. W., & Hoijtink, H. (1990). The many null distributions of person fit indices. Psychometrika 55, 75–106.
Montgomery, D. C. (1997). Introduction to statistical quality control (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Nering, M. L. (1997). The distribution of indexes of person fit within the computerized adaptive testing environment. Applied Psychological Measurement 21, 115–127.
Nering, M. L., & Meijer, R. R. (1998). A comparison of the person response function and the 1z statistic to person-fit measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement 22, 53–69.
Page, E. S. (1954). Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41, 100–115.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligent and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Nielsen and Lydiche.
Snijders, T. A. B. (2000). Asymptotic null distribution of person fit statistics with estimated person parameter. Psychometrika, in press.
Trabin, T. E., & Weiss, D. J. (1983). The person response curve: Fit of individuals to item response theory models. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.): New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing. New York: Academic Press.
van den Brink, W. P. (1977). Het verken-effect [The scouting effect]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch 2, 253–261.
van Krimpen-Stoop, E. M. L. A., & Meijer, R. R. (1999). Simulating the null distribution of person-fit statistics for conventional and adaptive tests. Applied Pychological Measurement, 23, 327–345.
Veerkamp, W. J. J.(1997). Statistical methods for computerized adaptive testing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika 54.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design: Rasch measurement. Chicago: Mesa Press.
Zickar, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1996). Detecting faking on a personality instrument using appropriateness measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement 20, 71–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Krimpen-Stoop, E.M.L.A., Meijer, R.R. (2000). Detecting Person Misfit in Adaptive Testing Using Statistical Process Control Techniques. In: van der Linden, W.J., Glas, G.A. (eds) Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47531-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47531-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6425-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47531-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive