This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Australian Education Council (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Carlton,Vic: Curriculum Corporation.
Barg, J. and Schul, J. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72 (5), pp 593–604
Bennett, N. and Desforges, C. (1988). Matching classroom tasks to student’s attainment. The Elementary School Journal, 88 (3), pp 221–234.
Bennett, N. and Dunne, E. (1992). Managing CIassroom Groups. Hemel Hempstead: Simon and Schuster Education.
Berk, L.E. and Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding Children’s Learning:Vygotsky and Early Childhood Education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, pp 21–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. and Haste, H., (Eds.) (1987). Making Sense: The Child’s Construction of the World. Bath: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
Cambourne, B. (1988). The Whole Story: Natural Learning and the Acquisition of Literacy in the Classroom. Auckland, N.Z.: Ashton Scholastic.
Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis M., Reimann, P. and Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, pp 145–182.
Chi, M.T.H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M-H. and La Vancher, C. (1994). Elicting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, pp 439–477.
Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching. In Davis, R.B., Maher, C.A. and Noddings, N. (Eds.), Construcitvist Views on Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph No. 4, pp 107–124. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 331–343.
Dole, J.A., Valencia, S.W., Greer, E.A. and Wardrop, J.L. (1991). Effects of two types of prereading instruction on the comprehension of narrative and expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, pp 142–159.
Ernest, P. (1995). The One and the Many. In L Straffe and J. Gale (Eds), Constructivism in Education. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Forman, E. and Cazden, C. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian Perspectives in Education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In Wertsch, J. (Ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, pp 323–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Ringwood: Penguin Books.
Gooding, A. and Stacey, K. (1993). Characteristics of small group discussion reducing misconceptions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 5 (1), pp 60–73.
Greenfield, P.M. (1984). A Theory of the Teacher in the Learning Activities of Everyday Life. In Rogoff, B. and Lave J., (Eds.), Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context, pp 117–138. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holton, D.A., Spicer, T, Thomas, G. and Young, S. (1996). The Benefits of Problem Solving in the Learning of Mathematics. Report No. 546 to the Ministry of Education, Wellington.
Holton, D.A., Anderson, J. and Thomas, B. (1997). OPE-N Plan for Teaching Mathematical Problem Solving.: Report No. 587 to the Ministry of Education, Wellington.
Holton, D.A., Spicer, T. and Thomas, G. (1999). Scaffolding and Mathematical Problem Solving, submitted.
Holton, D.A. and Thomas, G. (1999). The Nature of Task, submitted.
Hoyles, C. (1989). What is the point of group discussion in mathematics? In Murphy, P. and Moon, B. (Eds.), Developments in Learning and Assessment, pp 121–129. London: Open University Press.
James, J. and Sanderson, P. (1990). SHAPA 2.0: Software to heuristically assist protocol analysis. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Maker, C. (1982). Curriculum Develoment for the Gifted, Rockville, Maryland: Aspen Systems Corporation.
Mercer, N. (1994). Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education. In Stierer, B. and Maybin, J. (Eds.), Language, Literacy and Learning in Educational Practice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Ministry of Education (1992). Mathematics in the New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, N.Z.: Learning Media.
Russell, D.M. and Kelley, L (1991). Using IDE in instructional design through automated design tools. Paper presented at Annual Conference of American Education Research Association.
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition.In Schoenfeld, A.H. (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A.J. (1992). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition and Sense-Making in Mathematics. In Grouws, D.A. (Ed.) Handbook of Research in Mathematics Teaching and Learning, pp 334–370. New York: Macmillan.
Smith, A. (1992). Understanding Children’s Development. Wellington, N.Z.: Bridget Williams.
Stacey, K. (1994). Challenges and constraints for constructing curriculum. In G. Bell, R. Wright, N. Lessen and J. Geake (Eds.), Challenges in Mathematics Education: Constraints on Construction. Proceedings of MERGA 17.
Steffe, L.P. and Gale, J. (1995). Constructivism in Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thomas, G. (1994). Discussion in Junior Mathematics: Helping one another learn? Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Tudge, J. (1990). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development and peer collaboration: Implications for classroom practice. In Moll, L. (Ed.), Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology, pp 155–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A Constructivist Approach To Teaching. L.P. Steffe and J. Gale, (Eds.) Constructivism in Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press and Wiley.
Webb, N.M.(1989). Peer interaction and learning in smallgroups. International Journal of Education Research, 13, pp 21–39.
Webb, N.(1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22 (5), pp 366–389.
Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. and Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, pp 89–100.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holton, D., Thomas, G. (2001). Mathematical Interactions and Their Influence on Learning. In: Clarke, D. (eds) Perspectives on Practice and Meaning in Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Mathematics Education Library, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47228-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47228-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6938-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47228-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive