Skip to main content

The logic of the Gödel proof predicate

  • Contributed Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Logic and Proof Theory (KGC 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 713))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We discuss the logics of the operators “p is a proof of A” and “p is a proof containing A” for the standard Gödel proof predicate in Peano Arithmetic. Decidability and arithmetical completeness of these logics are proved. We use the same semantics as for the Provability Logic where the operator “A is provable” is studied.

Supported by the Swiss Nationalfonds (projects 21-27878.89 and 20-32705.91) during two stays at the University of Berne in January 1992 and January 1993.

Supported by the Union Bank of Switzerland (UBS/SBG) and by the Swiss Nationalfonds (projects 21-27878.89 and 20-32705.91).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Artëmov, “Extensions of arithmetic and connected with them modal theories,” VI IMPS Congress, Hannover, pp. 15–19, 1979. Section 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Artëmov, “Arifmeticheski polnyje modal'nyje teorii; Russian (Arithmetically complete modal theories),” Semiotika i informatika (Semiotics and Information Science), vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 115–133, 1980. Translation: AMS Transi. (2), vol 135, 1987, pp. 39–54, Akad. Nauk SSSR, VINiTI, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Artëmov and T. Straßen, “The Basic Logic of Proofs,” Tech. Rep. IAM 92-018, Department for computer science, University of Berne, Switzerland, September 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Artëmov and T. Straßen, “Functionality in the Basic Logic of Proofs,” Tech. Rep. IAM 93-004, Department for computer science, University of Berne, Switzerland, January 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Artëmov and T. Straßen, “The Basic Logic of Proofs,” in Computer Science Logic, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 14–28, 6th Workshop, CSL'92, San Miniato, Italy, October 1992, Springer-Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Boolos, The unprovability of consistency: an essay in modal logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Boolos, “Extremely undecidable sentences,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 47, pp. 191–196, Mar. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Kleene, Introduction to Metamathematics. North-Holland, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Montagna, “On the diagonalizable algebra of Peano arithmetic,” Bollettino della Unione Matematica Italiana, vol. 16-B, no. 5, pp. 795–812, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Smoryński, “The incompleteness theorems,” in Handbook of Mathematical Logic (J. Barwise, ed.), ch. D.1, S3, pp. 821–865, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. M. Solovay, “Provability interpretations of modal logic,” Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 25, pp. 287–304, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Visser, Aspects of Diagonalization and Provability. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Georg Gottlob Alexander Leitsch Daniele Mundici

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Artëmov, S., Straßen, T. (1993). The logic of the Gödel proof predicate. In: Gottlob, G., Leitsch, A., Mundici, D. (eds) Computational Logic and Proof Theory. KGC 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 713. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0022556

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0022556

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57184-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47943-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics