Skip to main content

Relative Salinity Tolerance of 35 Lolium spp. Cultivars for Urban Landscape and Forage Use

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developments in Soil Salinity Assessment and Reclamation

Abstract

Increasing population growth, particularly in urban centers, is resulting in critical freshwater shortages for both agriculture and urban use worldwide. To counteract existing water crises, many governments are restricting use of freshwater sources for irrigation. In the urban setting, governments are requiring use of reclaimed wastewater or other secondary saline water sources in lieu of freshwater for landscape irrigation. Lolium spp. (ryegrasses) is widely used for forage as well as in urban turf landscapes. Relative salinity tolerance of 35 Lolium spp. cultivars was determined in solution culture by measuring changes in shoot weight, root weight, rooting depth, and % green leaf canopy area, relative to control (non-salinized) plants. There was a wide range in salinity tolerance of the tested cultivars, ranging from salt tolerant (e.g., cv. Paragon) to salt sensitive (e.g., cv. Midway). All shoot parameters were highly correlated, being mutually effective predictors of salinity tolerance. Root dry weight, significantly correlated with all shoot quality and growth parameters, was also effective in predicting relative salinity tolerance. However, rooting depth was not correlated with other parameters, and therefore not effective in predicting relative salinity tolerance. Based on these results, it is concluded that salt-tolerant cultivars exist within Lolium spp. for agricultural forage and urban landscape use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson RF, Rosenberg B, Sheahan J (2005) The U.S. Conference of Mayors urban water council national city water survey, 2005, p 31, Washington, DC http://www.usmayors.org/74thWinterMeeting/NationalCityWaterSurvey2005.pdf

  • Arizona Department of Water Resources (2003) Third management plan: 2000–2010. Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix. http://www.azwater.gov/dwr/Content/Publications/files/ThirdMgmtPlan/tmp_final/

  • Barnes RF, Nelsen CJ, Collins M (2003) Forages, an introduction to grassland agriculture. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, p 556

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett TP, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 438:303–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • California State Water Resources Control Board (2006) Porter-Cologne water quality control act, California Water Code, Section 13552–13577. California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_laws/docs/portercologne.pdf

  • Cosgrove D, Casler M, Undersander D (1999) Ryegrass types for pasture and hay. Agronomy Advice FC 14.12.2, University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension. http://www.uwex.edu/CES/forage/pubs/ryegrass.htm

  • Council of Australian Governments (2004). National water initiative. Council of Australian Governments meeting, 25 June, Canberra, ACT. http://www.coag.gov.au/meetings/250604/index.htm#water_initiative

  • Der G, Everitt BS (2001) A handbook of statistical analyses using SAS, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) Water scarcity and drought: in-depth assessment. First interim report – Nov 2006, p 68, Brussels, Belgium, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/pdf/1st_report.pdf

  • Harivandi MA, Butler JD, Wu L (1992) Salinity and turfgrass culture. In: Waddington DV, Carrow RN, Shearman RC (eds) Turfgrass – Agronomy Monograph 32. American Society of Agronomics, Madison, pp 207–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjelgren R, Rupp L, Kilgren D (2000) Water conservation in urban landscapes. Hort Sci 35:1037–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcum KB (2006) Use of saline and non-potable water in the turfgrass industry: constraints and developments. Agric Water Manage 80:132–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcum KB, Pessarakli M, Kopec DM (2005) Relative salinity tolerance of 21 turf-type desert saltgrasses compared to bermudagrass. Hort Sci 40(3):827–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearman GI, Hennessy K, Jones R, Maheepala S (2003) Climate change and its predicted effects on water resources. In: Water, the Australian dilemma. Proceedings of the annual symposium of the Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering. The Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, Melbourne, pp 174–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turgeon AJ (2005) Turfgrass management, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Englwood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth B. Marcum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marcum, K.B., Pessarakli, M. (2013). Relative Salinity Tolerance of 35 Lolium spp. Cultivars for Urban Landscape and Forage Use. In: Shahid, S., Abdelfattah, M., Taha, F. (eds) Developments in Soil Salinity Assessment and Reclamation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5684-7_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics