Skip to main content

Assuring Child Support: A Re-assessment in Honor of Alfred Kahn

  • Chapter
From Child Welfare to Child Well-Being

Part of the book series: Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research ((CHIR,volume 1))

Abstract

The American system of assuring child support directly affects most parents and children and indirectly affects all Americans. By child support we mean transfers to custodial parents (mostly mothers)1 from either nonresident parents or taxpayers. More than one half of American children now spend part of their childhood living apart from one of their parents. The system indirectly affects all Americans because of its impact on transfers and taxes and on future generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argys, L. M., Peters, H. E., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Smith, J. R. (1998). The impact of child support on cognitive outcomes of young children. Demography, 35(2), 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartfeld, J., & Garfinkel, I. (1996). The impact of percentage expressed child support orders on payments. The Journal of Human Resources, 31(4), 794–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. (2002). Evaluating welfare reform in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 9, 1105–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito, T. (2005). Child support guidelines and complicated families: An analysis of cross-state variation in legal treatment of multiple-partner fertility. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, M., & Meyer, D. R. (2006). Alternative approaches to child support policy in the context of multiple-partner fertility. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, M., Meyer, D. R., & Caspar, E. (2008). Welfare and child support: Complements, not substitutes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(2), 354–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. J., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of multi-partnered fertility among urban U.S. parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(3), 718–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (2008). Policy basics: The earned income tax credit. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Economic Security. (1934). Report to the President of the committee on economic security. Social Security Administration. Social Security Online: History. http://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/ces/ces.html

  • Doolitle, F., Knox, V., Miller, C., & Rowser, S. (1998). Building opportunities, enforcing obligations: Implementation and interim impacts of parents’ fair share. New York: MDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K. (2000). Few good men: Why poor mothers don’t marry or remarry. The American Prospect, 11(4), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fertig, A. R., McLanahan, S. S., & Garfinkel, I. (2006). Child support enforcement and domestic violence among non-cohabiting couples. Center for Research on Child Wellbeing Working Paper "02-17-FF. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I. (1992). Assuring child support: An extension of the social security system. New York: Russell Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I. (1994). The child-support revolution. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I., Gaylin, D. S., Huang, C.-C., & McLanahan, S. (2000). The roles of child support enforcement and welfare in non-marital childbearing. Unpublished Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I., Heintze, T., & Huang, C.-C. (2000b, December 8). Child support enforcement: Incentives and well-being. Conference on Incentive Effects of Tax and Transfer Policies, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan. S. (1986). Single mothers and their children: A new American dilemma. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I., McLanahan, S. S., & Hanson, T. L. (1998a). A patchwork portrait of nonresident fathers. In I. Garfinkel, S. S. McLanahan, D. R. Meyer, & J. A. Seltzer (Eds.), Fathers under fire: The revolution in child support enforcement (pp. 31–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I., Melli, M. S., & Robertson, J. G. (1994). Child support orders: A perspective on reform. The Future of Children: Children and Divorce, 4(1), 84–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I., Meyer, D. R., & McLanahan, S. S. (1998b). A brief history of child support policies in the United States. In I. Garfinkel, S. S. McLanahan, D. R. Meyer, & J. A. Seltzer (Eds.), Fathers under fire: The revolution in child support enforcement (pp. 1–13). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Beller, A. H., & Hernandez, P. M. (1994). The effects of child support on educational attainment. In I. Garfinkel, S. McLanahan, & P. K. Robins (Eds.), Child support and child well-being (pp. 317–354). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, T. L., Garfinkel, I., McLanahan, S. S., & Miller, C. K. (1996). Trends in child support outcomes. Demography, 33(4), 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, P. M., Beller, A. H., & Graham, J. W. (1995). Changes in the relationship between child support payments and the educational attainment of offspring. Demography, 32, 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, S. (2006). The earned income tax credit at age 30: What we know. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Policy Briefing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-C., Mincy, R., & Garfinkel, I. (2005). Child support obligations of low-income fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1213–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A. J., & Kamerman, S. B. (1988). Child support: From debt collection to social policy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, V., & Bane, M. J. (1994). Child support and schooling. In I. Garfinkel, S. McLanahan, & P. Robins (Eds.), Child support and child well-being (pp. 285–310). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, J., Villeneuve, P., & Garfinkel, I. (2001). Child support among selected OECD countries: A comparative analysis. In K. Vleminckx & T. Smeeding (Eds.), Child well-being, child poverty, and child policy in modern nations: What do we know?. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legler, P. K. (1996). The coming revolution in child support policy. Family Law Quarterly, 30(3), 519–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41(4), 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. S., Seltzer, J. A., Hanson, T. L., & Thompson, E. (1994). Child support enforcement and child well-being: Greater security or greater conflict. In I. Garfinkel, S. McLanahan, & P. Robins (Eds.), Child support and child well-being. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D., Garfinkel, I., Oellerich, D., & Robins, P. (1994). Who should be eligible for an assured child support benefit? In I. Garfinkel, S. S. McLanahan, & P. K. Robins (Eds.), Child support and child well-being. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. R., Cancian, M., & Cook, S. T. (2005). Multiple-partner fertility: Incidence and implications for child support policy. Social Service Review, 79(4), 577–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. R., Cancian, M., & Nam, K. (2007). Welfare and child support program knowledge gaps reduce program effectiveness. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(3), 575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. R., Garfinkel, I., Oellerich, D. T., & Robins, P. K. (1992). Who should be eligible for an assured child support benefit? In I. Garfinkel, S. McLanahan, & P. K. Robins (Eds.), Child support assurance: Design issues, expected impacts, and political barriers as seen from Wisconsin. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepomnyaschy, L., & Garfinkel, I. (2007). Child support and fathers’ contributions to their nonmarital children. Center for Research on Child Wellbeing Working Paper "2006-09-FF, Princeton University. http://crcw.princeton.edu/workingpapers/WP06-09-FF.pdf

  • Nichols-Casebolt, A., & Garfinkel, I. (1991). Trends in paternity adjudications and child support awards. Social Science Quarterly, 72(1), 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oellerich, D., Garfinkel, I., & Robins, P. (1991). Private child support: Current and potential impacts. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 18(1), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, D. J. (2002). An ethnographic inquiry into the life experiences of African American fathers with children on W-2. W-2 Child support demonstration evaluation: Report on nonexperimental analyses: Volume II: Fathers of children in W-2 families. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., & Curtis, M. A. (2005). TANF sanctioning and hardship. The Social Service Review, 79(2), 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., Garfinkel, I., & Garcia, S. (2004). Variations in maternal and child well-being among financially eligible mothers by TANF participation status. Eastern Economic Journal, 30(1), 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J. A., & Brandreth, Y. (1994). What fathers say about involvement with children after separation. Journal of Family Issues, 15(1), 49–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J. A., McLanahan, S. S., & Hanson, T. L. (1998). Will child support enforcement increase father-child contact and parent conflict after separation. In I. Garfinkel, S. S. McLanahan, D. R. Meyer, & J. A. Seltzer (Eds.), Fathers under fire: The revolution in child support enforcement (pp. 157–190). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkewicz, M., & Garfinkel, I. (2009). New estimates of unwed fathers ability to pay child support: Accounting for multiple-partner fertility. Demography, 46(2), 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C., Bradshaw, J., & Davidson, J. (2007). Child support policy: An international perspective. Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report No. 405. Norwich, UK: Crown Copyright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, E., Sousa, L., & Schaner, S. (2007). Assessing child support arrears in nine large states and the nation. Department of Health and Human Services and Office of Child Support Enforcement, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turetsky, V. (2008). Responsible fatherhood and healthy family Act of 2007. Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP) Legislation in Brief, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (1989). Child support and Alimony: 1989. Current Population Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). Custodial mothers and fathers and their child support: 2005. Current Population Reports, Series P60–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2008a). America’s families and living arrangements: 2007. Current Population Reports, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2008b). Office of Child Support Enforcement FY 2005 Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, Office of Child Support Enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDHHS. (2008a). Caseload data. US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Caseload Data. www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/data-reports/caseload/caseload_recent.html

  • USDHHS. (2008b). Office of Child Support Enforcement FY 2005 Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, Office of Child Support Enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L., & Gallagher, M. (2001). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. R., & Plotnick, R. (2001). Effective child support policy for low-income families: Evidence from street level research. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(1), 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, L., & Sorensen, E. (2007). The potential impact of increasing child support payments to TANF families. Assessing the New Federalism, Brief 5. The Urban Institute: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garfinkel, I., Nepomnyaschy, L. (2010). Assuring Child Support: A Re-assessment in Honor of Alfred Kahn. In: Kamerman, S.B., Phipps, S., Ben-Arieh, A. (eds) From Child Welfare to Child Well-Being. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3377-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics