Skip to main content

Opportunities and Challenges in Using Geospatial Technologies for Education

  • Chapter
Geospatial Technologies and Geography Education in a Changing World

Part of the book series: Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences ((AGES))

Abstract

Opportunities in using geospatial technologies as a meaningful and sustained part of education exist as never before. Most obvious are technological opportunities, centered on the evolution of GST to a web-based platform, including editable online maps that can be customized, analyzed, and shared on any device. Geospatial skills and approaches can be effectively taught in an ever-growing variety of face-to-face and online platforms such as Massively Open Online Courses (MOOCs). But equally important are opportunities in education that focus attention on inquiry, critical thinking, outdoor education, authentic assessment, STEM, technical, green, and other careers, and meaningful teaching with technology. Societal trends offer unprecedented opportunity to use GST in education. These include location analytics that are embedding a positional component in everyday electronic devices, a growing awareness of the geographic significance of key twenty-first century issues, such as biodiversity, urbanization, food, hazards, water, human health, and others, and the increasing role seen for citizen science in solving problems.

Despite these opportunities, technological, pedagogical, and administrative issues still pose challenges. Technological challenges include Internet bandwidth, spatial data availability and permissions, and cost for software as a service. Pedagogical challenges include teaching with rapidly evolving web GST tools and a lack of a “home” for and awareness of geospatial technologies and spatial thinking in the curriculum. Administrative issues such as competition for educational class time and funding pose additional challenges. Nevertheless, geospatial technologies as a “transformational technology” could very well be poised to make a significant positive impact on education and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Hader, M., & Rodzi, A. (2009). Smart city infrastructure development and monitoring. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 2(9), 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T. R. (2005). Internet-based GIS mapping in support of K-12 education. The Professional Geographer, 57(1), 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T. R., Palmer, A. M., & Kerski, J. J. (2009). A national survey to examine teacher professional development and implementation of desktop GIS. Journal of Geography, 108, 174–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T. R., & Kerski, J. J. (2014). Lone trailblazers: GIS In K-12 science education. In J. G. MaKinster, N. M. Trautmann, & G. M. Barnett (Eds.), Teaching science and investigating environmental issues with geospatial technology: Designing effective professional development for teachers (pp. 347–372). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T. R., Kerski, J. J., Huynh, N. T., Viehrig, K., & Bednarz, S. W. (2012, Winter). Call for an agenda and center for GIS education research. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 2(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. F. (1988). Electric power for rural growth: How electricity affects rural life in developing countries. Boulder: Westview Press. 236 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2009). Project-based learning (234 p.). Rotterdam. Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalkley, B. (2006). Tertiary teaching excellence: The CETLs scheme in England. New Zealand Geographer, 62(2), 155–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangermond, J. (2003). GIS as a nervous system for the planet. In W. Tang & J. Selwood (Eds.), Connecting our world: GIS Web services. Redlands: Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBiase, D., DeMers, M., Johnson, A., Kemp, K., Taylor Luck, A., Plew, B., & Wentz, E. (2008). Chapter 62: Supporting curriculum development in geographic information science and technology: The GIS&T body of knowledge. In The manual of GIS (pp. 1261–1271). Bethesda: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBiase, D., Corbin, T., Fox, T., Francica, J., Green, K., Jackson, J., Jeffress, G., Jones, B., Jones, B., Mennis, J., Schuckman, K., Smith, C., & Van Sickle, J. (2010, December). The new geospatial technology competency model: Bringing workforce needs into focus. URISA Journal, 22(2), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drennon, C. (2005). Teaching geographic information systems in a problem-based learning environment. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(3), 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 291–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, M., Leipziger, D., Wodon, Q., & Yepes, T. (2005). Achieving child-related millennium development goals: The role of infrastructure. World Development, 33(8), 1267–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gewin, V. (2004, January 22). Mapping opportunities. Nature, 427, 376–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. (2010, December). What GIS technicians do: A synthesis of DACUM job analyses. URISA Journal, 22(2), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. B. (2014). Level of knowledge for geospatial occupations and the user community aligned with the competencies covered in higher education courses and programs. GeotechCenter.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. B., & Sullivan, D. (2010, December). Geospatial education at U.S. community colleges: Background, challenges, and opportunities. URISA Journal, 22(2), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1990). The internationalization of learning and the nationalization of the purposes of higher education: Two ‘Laws of Motion’ in conflict? European Journal of Education, 25(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerski, J. J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of GIS in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102(3), 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerski, J. J. (2008). Towards an international geospatial education community. In Digital geography: geospatial technologies in the social studies classroom. (pp. 61–74). Charlotte: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerski, J. J. (2012). Spatial environmental education: Teaching and learning about the environment with a spatial framework. Earthzine, 24 September issue. http://www.earthzine.org/2012/09/24/spatial-environmental-education-teaching-and-learning-about-the-environment-with-a-spatial-framework/. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.

  • Kerski, J., & Clark, J. (2012). The GIS guide to public domain data. Redlands: Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerski, J. J., & Demers, M. (2014). The Evolution of the T3G Institute and its implications. In Proceedings, 2014 annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerski, J., Demirci, A., & Milson, A. J. (2013). The global landscape of GIS in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 112(6, Fall), 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolvoord, B. (2008). Geospatial technologies: Real projects in real classrooms. Knowledge Quest 36(4), 40–45. American Libraries Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2006). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books. 335 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milson, A. J., Demirci, A., & Kerski, J. J. (2012). International perspectives on teaching and learning with GIS in secondary schools. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. A. (1999). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. B. (2007). Geography’s place in higher education in the United States. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(1), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. The National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11019

  • Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2010, Summer). Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. (2000). Environmental education in the 21st century. New York: Routledge. 304 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, F. (2013). Revisiting the ‘Is GIScience a science?’ debate (or quite possibly scientific gerrymandering). International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(2), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). The diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, D. (2011, July 28). What is SaaS? Software Advice. http://blog.softwareadvice.com/articles/enterprise/saas-faqs-1072811/

  • Solem, M. N. (2001). A scoring guide for assessing issues-based geographic inquiry on the world wide web. Journal of Geography, 100(2), 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D. (2014). Opportunities and impediments for open GIS. Transactions in GIS, 18(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. New York: Wiley. 256 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B. (2013, May 14). Welcome to the programmable world. Wired. http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2013/05/internet-of-things/

  • Wertheim, J. A., Edelson, D. C., & the Road Map Project Assessment Committee. (2013). A road map for improving geography assessment. The Geography Teacher, 10(1), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. J., & Goodchild, M. F. (1997). Data from the deep: Implications for the GIS community. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11(6), 523–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph J. Kerski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kerski, J.J. (2015). Opportunities and Challenges in Using Geospatial Technologies for Education. In: Muñiz Solari, O., Demirci, A., Schee, J. (eds) Geospatial Technologies and Geography Education in a Changing World. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55519-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics