Skip to main content

Cross-Sector Partnerships in Managing Disasters: Experiences from the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disaster Management and Private Sectors

Part of the book series: Disaster Risk Reduction ((DRR))

Abstract

Historically, emergency management has been a collaborative effort in the United States. Disasters were mostly handled locally by community organizations in the early years of twentieth century, however the picture began to change as the damage inflicted by disasters escalated. Focusing events triggered action in federal government, which ended up with numerous policy initiatives and creation of well-known organizations such as FEMA and DHS. Nevertheless, importance of nongovernmental actors has not declined. Today, about 85 % of critical infrastructure is owned and operated by the private sector. Also, FEMA embraces the ‘whole community’ approach in managing disasters. In this approach government agencies, individuals, families, households, businesses, nongovernmental organizations, academia and experts, and neighborhoods are integral parts of the community; and all of them have their own roles and responsibilities to a certain extend. Having so many stakeholders, building partnerships, and working together in a horizontal (nonhierarchical) setting is called collaborative emergency management. In collaborative emergency management all these stakeholders have certain responsibilities in managing emergencies. Emergency management organizations identify these roles and responsibilities and assign them to various partners. Resources, knowledge, and expertise of the partnering organizations are invaluable for emergency managers. For example, emergency management agencies rely on retail companies for timely distribution of certain resources to disaster stricken areas. The logistic capacity and speedy of delivery of such firms are unimaginable for the public sector. As the communities in the U.S. get more complex and threats such as climate change become more visible, emergency management system will likely to rely on collaborative ties with nongovernmental actors in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These three periods are determined arbitrarily. Depending on the perspective, one can identify many more periods. We preferred three time periods to keep this section of the chapter relatively brief.

References

  • Abou-Bakr A (2013) Managing disasters through public-private partnerships. Georgetown University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardach E (1998) Getting Agencies Working Together. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman, LC (2002) UCINET 6 for Windows. Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytical Technologies

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne M (2007) The New FEMA: Implications for State and Local Emergency Management, Retrieved from http://www.udel.edu/DRC/emforum/recordings/20070411.txt

  • Butler D (2012) The expanding role of the federal government: 1927–1950. In Rubin, CG (ed) Emergency Management: The American Experience: 1900–2010 (2nd Ed.), Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 51–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamlee-Wright E, Storr V (2009a) Club goods and post-disaster community return. Rationality and Society 21(4): 429–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamlee-Wright E, Storr V (2009b) There’s no place like New Orleans: Sense of place and community recovery in the ninth ward after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Urban Affairs 31(5): 615–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort LK (2007) Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67(Issue Supplement s1): 189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort LK (2008) Distributed cognition: The basis for coordinated action in dynamic environments. Paper presented at the Surviving Future Disasters, Baton Rouge, LA

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort LK, Boin A, Demchak C (2010) Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley LW (2003) Social vulnerabilities to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2): 242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demiroz F, Kapucu N, Dodson R (2013) Community Capacity and Interorganizational Networks for Disaster Resilience: Comparison of Rural and Urban Counties. In Kapucu N, Hawkins CV, Riveria FI (2013) (eds), Disaster Resiliency: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp. 334–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Demiroz F (2012) Cross-sector and interorganizational collaborative capacity in community disaster resilience and sustainability: Evidence From central Florida counties. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikenberry AM, Arroyave V, Cooper T (2007) Administrative failure and the international NGO response to Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration Review 67(S1): 160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2011) National Disaster Recovery Framework. Retrieved from http://www.fema.gov/pdf/recoveryframework/ndrf.pdf

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2013a) National response framework

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2013b) National mitigation framework

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2013c) Private sector division. Retrieved from http://www.fema.gov/private-sector-division

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2014a) National preparedness resource library. Retrieved from http://www.fema.gov/national-preparedness-resource-library

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2014b) About the national flood insurance program. Retrieved from https://www.floodsmart.gov/floodsmart/pages/about/nfip_overview.jsp

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2014c) Public private partnership models. Retrieved from http://www.fema.gov/public-private-partnership-models

  • Gazley B (2013) Building collaborative capacity for disaster resiliency. In Kapucu N, Hawkins C, Rivera FI, Disaster Resilience: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, New York: Routledge, pp. 84–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2006) Critical infrastructure protection: Progress coordinating government and private sector efforts varies by sectors and characteristics. GAO-07-39

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddow G, Bullock J, Coppola DP (2011) Introduction to Emergency Management. Burlington, MA: Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR, Connolly E, Carter TS (2011) Corporate Social Responsibility of Fortune 100 Companies in Domestic and International Natural Disasters. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18(6): 352–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamarck EC (2002) Applying 21st century government to the challenge of homeland security. Arlington, VA: Pricewaterhouse Coopers Endowment for The Business of Government

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N (2006) Interagency communication networks during emergencies: boundary spanners in multiagency coordination, American Review of Public Administration, 36(2): 207–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N (2008) Collaborative emergency management: Better community organizing, better public preparedness and response, Disasters 32(2): 239–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N (2009) Interorganizational coordination in complex environments of disasters: The evolution of intergovernmental disaster response systems. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 6(1): Article 47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N and Demiroz F (2011) Measuring Performance for collaborative public management using network analysis methods and tools. Public Performance Management and Review, 34(4), 549–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N, Arslan T, Demiroz F (2010) Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 19(4): 452–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N, Yuldashev F, Feldheim MA (2011) Nonprofit organizations in disaster response and management: A network analysis. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies 4(1), 83–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu N, Hawkins CV, Rivera FI (2013) Disaster Resilience: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koliba C, Meek J, Zia A (2011) Governance networks in public administration and public policy. Boca Raton: CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H (2001) Incentives for mitigation investment and more effective risk management: The need for public private partnership. Journal of Hazardous Materials 86(1–3): 171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H (2006) Disaster mitigation and insurance: Learning from Katrina. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science 604(1): 208–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo SS, Means B (2012) Corporate Social Responsibility After Disaster. Washington University Law Review 89(5): 974–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell M, Keast R (2007) Evaluating Network Arrangements: Toward Revised Performance Measures. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(4): 574–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Williams J (2014) Public-Private Partnerships from Theory to Practice: Walgreens and the Boston Public Health Commission Supporting Each Other Before and After the Boston Bombings. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 7(3): 205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire M (2006) Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, Special Issue: 33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne D, Gaebler T (1993) Reinventing the government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips B, Neal D, Webb G (2012). Introduction to emergency management. Boca Raton: CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert P, Ward R, Wamsley G (2012) The Evolving Federal Role in Emergency Management: Policies and Processes. In Rubin, CG (ed) Emergency Management: The American Experience: 1900–2010 (2nd Ed.), Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 247–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin CG (2012) Introduction: 110 years of disaster response and emergency management in the United States. In Rubin CG (ed), Emergency Management: The American Experience: 1900–2010 (2nd Ed), Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, LM (2001) The new governance and tools of public action: An introduction. Fordham Urban Law Journal 28(5): Article 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, LM (2002) The tools of government: A guide to new governance. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Visit Orlando (2014) Visitor Volumes. Retrieved from http://corporate.visitorlando.com/research-and-statistics/orlando-visitor-statistics/visitor-volumes/

  • Waugh WL (2003) Terrorism, Homeland Security and the National Emergency Management Network, Public Organization Review, 3(4): 373–85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatih Demiroz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

figure a

Roles and responsibilities of the ESFs

Source: FEMA (2014a)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Demiroz, F., Kapucu, N. (2015). Cross-Sector Partnerships in Managing Disasters: Experiences from the United States. In: Izumi, T., Shaw, R. (eds) Disaster Management and Private Sectors. Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55414-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics