Skip to main content

Clearing Markets via Bundles

  • Conference paper
Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8768))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study algorithms for combinatorial market design problems, where a set of heterogeneous and indivisible objects are priced and sold to potential buyers subject to equilibrium constraints. Extending the CWE notion introduced by Feldman et al. [STOC 2013], we introduce the concept of a Market-Clearing Combinatorial Walrasian Equilibium (MC-CWE) as a natural relaxation of the classical Walrasian equilibrium (WE) solution concept. The only difference between a MC-CWE and a WE is the ability for the seller to bundle the items prior to sale. This innocuous and natural bundling operation imposes a plethora of algorithmic and economic challenges and opportunities. Unlike WE, which is guaranteed to exist only for (gross) substitutes valuations, a MC-CWE always exists. The main algorithmic challenge, therefore, is to design computationally efficient mechanisms that generate MC-CWE outcomes that approximately maximize social welfare. For a variety of valuation classes encompassing substitutes and complements (including super-additive, single-minded and budget-additive valuations), we design polynomial-time MC-CWE mechanisms that provide tight welfare approximation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andelman, N., Mansour, Y.: Auctions with budget constraints. In: Hagerup, T., Katajainen, J. (eds.) SWAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3111, pp. 26–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrow, K.J., Debreu, G.: Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22, 265–290 (1954)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Azar, Y., Birnbaum, B., Karlin, A.R., Mathieu, C., Nguyen, C.T.: Improved approximation algorithms for budgeted allocations. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) ICALP 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5125, pp. 186–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bikhchandani, S., Mamer, J.W.: Competitive equilibrium in an exchange economy with indivisibilities. Journal of Economic Theory 74(2), 385–413 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bikhchandani, S., Ostroy, J.M.: The package assignment model. Journal of Economic Theory 107(2), 377–406 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chakrabarty, D., Goel, G.: On the approximability of budgeted allocations and improved lower bounds for submodular welfare maximization and gap. In: FOCS 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feige, U., Vondrak, J.: Approximation algorithms for allocation problems: Improving the factor of 1 - 1/e. In: 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2006, pp. 667–676 (October 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feldman, M., Gravin, N., Lucier, B.: Combinatorial walrasian equilibrium. In: STOC, pp. 61–70 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fiat, A., Wingarten, A.: Envy, multi envy, and revenue maximization. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 498–504. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu, H., Kleinberg, R., Lavi, R.: Conditional equilibrium outcomes via ascending price processes with applications to combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, p. 586 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gul, F., Stacchetti, E.: Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes. J. of Economic Theory 87(1), 95–124 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Guruswami, V., Hartline, J.D., Karlin, A.R., Kempe, D., Kenyon, C., McSherry, F.: On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holzman, R., Kfir-Dahav, N., Monderer, D., Tennenholtz, M.: Bundling equilibrium in combinatorial auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 47(1), 104–123 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelso Jr., A.S., Crawford, V.P.: Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes. Econometrica 50(6), 1483–1504 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mirrokni, V., Schapira, M., Vondrak, J.: Tight information-theoretic lower bounds for welfare maximization in combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC 2008, pp. 70–77. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nisan, N., Segal, I.: The communication requirements of efficient allocations and supporting prices. Journal of Economic Theory 129(1), 192–224 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Shapley, L.S., Shubik, M.: The assignment game i: The core. International Journal of Game Theory 1, 111–130 (1971), doi:10.1007/BF01753437

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Srinivasan, A.: Budgeted allocations in the full-information setting. In: Goel, A., Jansen, K., Rolim, J.D.P., Rubinfeld, R. (eds.) APPROX and RANDOM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5171, pp. 247–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Feldman, M., Lucier, B. (2014). Clearing Markets via Bundles. In: Lavi, R. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8768. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44802-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44803-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics