Abstract
Evolutionary psychologists have widely accepted that there are biological reasons for body shape and size preferences in potential sexual partners. Female physical attractiveness is considered to be largely a reflection of her potential reproductive success. Recent research suggests that male physical attractiveness is also based upon the same criterion. Reproductive success is defined as the optimum (for a given environment) number of children surviving to reach sexual maturity and to become parents themselves. Buss (1989) suggests that there are cultural universals in desired body size and shape for intersexual attraction, and that these derive from the division of labor between males and females during the course of evolution, where males specialized in hunting activities and females in food gathering and child rearing. Natural and sexual selection are believed to have operated in a way that men and women whose bodies were best suited for these tasks were most attractive to potential mates. We find that females consider their physical appearance as “efficient” when they attract mates, males consider their body as efficient when it promises success in male-male competition (Erikson 1968; Lerner et al. 1976).
“From the invisible atom to the celestial body lost in space. Everything is movement... it is the most apparent characteristic of life: it manifests itself in all functions. It is even the essence of several of them.”
Etienne-Jules Marey (1839–1904), the pioneer of motion research
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alados CL, Escos J, Emlen JM (1995) Fluctuating asymmetry and fractal geometry of the saggital suture: two tools for detecting developmental instability caused by inbreeding depression in North African gazelles. Can J Zool 73: 1967–1974
Alley TR, Cunningham MR (1991) Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychol Sci 2 (2): 123–125
Barber N (1995) The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: sexual selection and human morphology. Ethol Sociobiol 16: 395–424
Barclay CD, Cutting JE, Kozlowski LT (1978) Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception Psychophys 23: 145–152
Bassingthwaighte JB, Raymond GM (1994) Evaluating rescaled range analysis for time series. Ann Biomed Eng 22: 432–444
Bassingthwaighte JB, Raymond GM (1995) Evaluation of the dispersional analysis method for fractal time series. Ann Biomed Eng 23: 491–505
Bente G, Krämer NC, Petersen A, de Ruiter JP (2001) Computer animated movement and person perception. Methodological advances in nonverbal behavior research. J Nonverbal Behav 25 (3): 151–166
Berry DS, Kean KJ, Misovich SJ, Baron RM (1991) Quantized displays of human movement:
a methodological alternative to the point light display. J Nonverbal Behav 15:81–97
Bloj MG, Kersten D, Hurlbert AC (1999) Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination. Nature 402: 877–879
Bruce V, Burton AM, Hanna E, Healey P, Mason O, Coombes A, Fright R, Linney A (1993) Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception 22: 131–152
Bruce V, Green PR, Georgeson MA (1996) Visual perception. Physiology, psychology, and ecology, 3rd edn. Psychology Press, Hove
Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G, Freund H-J (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13: 400–405
Buss DM (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav Brain Sci 12: 1–49
Cioni M, Richards CL, Malouin F, Bedard PJ, Lemieux R (1997) Characteristics of the electromyographic patterns of lower limb muscles during gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease when OFF and ON L-Dopa treatment. Ital J Neurol Sci 18: 195–208
Cunningham MR, Roberts AR, Wu CH, Barbee AP, Druen PB (1995) Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female attractiveness. J Personality Social Psychol 68: 261–279
Cunningham MR, Druen PB, Barbee AP (1997) Angels, mentors and friends: trade-offs among evolutionary, social, and individual variables in physical appearance. In: Simpson JA, Kenrick DT (eds) Evolutionary social psychology. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 109–140
Cutting JE, Kozlowski LT (1977) Recognizing friends by their walk: gait perception without familiarity cues. Bull Psychonomic Soc 9: 353–356
Cutting JE, Proffitt DR, Kozlowski LT (1978) A biomechanical invariant for gait perception. J Exp Psychol Human Perception Performance 4: 357–72
Dabbs JM (2000) Heroes, rogues, and lovers. McGraw-Hill, New York
Darwin C (1872) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London DePaulo B (1992) Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychol Bull 111 (2): 203–243
Dion KK, Berscheid E, Walster E (1972) What is beautiful is good. J Personality Social Psychol 24: 285–290
Dittrich WH, Troscianko T, Lea SE, Morgan D (1996) Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception 25: 727–738
Ekman P (1986) Telling lies. Norton, New York
Ellison PT (1999) Reproductive ecology and reproductive cancers. In: Panter-Brick C, Worthman C (eds) Hormones, health and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 184–209
Ellison PT (2001) On fertile ground: a natural history of human reproduction. Harvard University Press, Harvard
Enquist M, Arak A (1994) Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 372:169–172 Erikson E (1968) Identity: youth and crisis. WW Norton, New York
Etcoff NL (1994) Beauty and the beholder. Nature 368: 186–187
Farkas LA, Munro IR (1987) Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL
Fink B, Grammer K, Thornhill R (2001) Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. J Comp Psychol 115 (1): 92–99
Friedman HS, Riggio RE, Casella DF (1988) Nonverbal skill, personal charisma, and initial attraction. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 14 (1): 203–211
Gallese V, Goldman A (1998) Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cognitive Sci 2: 493–501
Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119: 593–609
George PA, Graham JH (2000) The role of spatial and surface cues in the age-processing of unfamiliar faces. Visual Cognition 7: 485–510
Grammer K, Thornhill R (1994) Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol 108: 233–242
Grammer K, Fieder M, Filova V (1997) The communication paradox and possible solutions. In: Schmitt A, Atzwanger K, Grammer K, Schäfer K (eds) New aspects of human ethology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 91–120
Grammer K, Honda R, Juette A, Schmitt A (1999) Fuzziness of nonverbal courtship com- munication: unblurred by automatic movie analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol 77 (3): 487–508
Grammer K, Fink B, Juette A, Ronzal G, Thornhill R (2002) Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In: Rhodes G, Zebrowitz L (eds) Advances in visual cognition, vol 1: facial attractiveness–evolutionary, cognitive, cultural and motivational perspectives. Ablex, Westport, CT, pp 91–125
Halberstadt J, Rhodes G (2000) The attractiveness of nonface averages: implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces. Psychol Sci 11:285–289 Hall ET ( 1966 ) The hidden dimension. Doubleday, New York
Hampson E, Kimura D (1988) Reciprocal effects of hormonal fluctuations on human motor and perceptual-spatial skills. Behav Neurosci 102: 456–459
Henss R (1992) “Spieglein, Spieglein an der Wand…” Geschlecht, Alter und physische Attraktivität (“Mirror, mirror on the wall…” Sex, age, and physical attractiveness). Psychologie Verlags Union, München
Hurst HE (1951) Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civil Eng 116: 770–799
Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G (1999) Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 286: 2526–2528
Jöchle W (1973) Coitus induced ovulation. Contraception 7: 523–564
Johansson G (1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model of its analysis. Perception Psychophys 14: 201–211
Johnston FE (1998) Morphology. In: Ulijaszek SJ, Johnston FE, Preece MA (eds) The Cambridge encyclopedia of human growth and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 193–195
Johnstone RA (1994) Female preferences for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition. Nature 372: 172–175
Jones DA, Round JM (1998) Human skeletal muscle across lifespan. In: Ulijaszek SJ, Johnston FE, Preece MA (eds) The Cambridge encyclopedia of human growth and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 202–205
Lander K, Christie F, Bruce V (1999) The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Mem Cognition 27: 974–985
Larrance DT, Zuckerman N (1981) Facial attractiveness and vocal likeability as determinants of nonverbal sending skills. J Pers 49 (4): 349–362
Lerner RM, Orlos JB, Knapp JR (1976) Physical attractiveness, physical effectiveness, and self-concept in late adolescents. Adolescence 11 (43): 313–326
Manning JT, Pickup LJ (1998) Symmetry and performance in middle distance runners. Int J Sports Med 19 (3): 205–209
Manning JT, Taylor RP (2001) Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evol Human Behav 22 (1): 61–69
Moller AP (1998) Developmental instability as a general measure of stress. Adv Stud Behav 27: 181–213
Moller AP, Pomiankowski A (1993) Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32: 167–176
Moller AP, Sanotra GS, Vestergaard KS (1999) Developmental instability and light regime in chickens (Gallus gallus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 62: 57–71
Montepare JM, Zebrowitz M, McArthur L (1988) Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits. J Pers Soc Psychol 55: 547–556
Morris D (1967) The naked ape: a zoologist’s study of the human animal. McGraw-Hill, New York
O’Toole A, Edelman S, Buelthoff HH (1998) Stimulus specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint. Vision Res 38: 2351–2363
O’Toole A, Vetter T, Blanz V (1999) Three-dimensional shape and two-dimensional surface reflectance contributions to face recognition: an application of three-dimensional morphing. Vision Res 39: 3145–3155
Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S (1994) Facial shape and judgement of female attractiveness. Nature 386: 239–242
Riggio RE, Friedman HS (1986) Impression formation: the role of expressive behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 50 (2): 421–427
Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L (1996) Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Res 3: 131–141
Sabatelli RM, Rubin M (1986) Nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness as mediators of interpersonal perceptions. J Nonverbal Behav 10: 120–133
Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R (1999) Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 266: 1913–1917
Schmitt A, Atzwanger K (1995) Walking fast: ranking high: a sociobiological perspective on pace. Ethol Sociobiol 16: 451–462
Stenn PG, Klinge V (1972) Relationship between the menstrual cycle and bodily activity in humans. Hormones Behav 3: 297–305
Stevenage SV, Nixon MS, Vince K (1999) Visual analysis of gait as a cue to identity. Appl Cognitive Psychol 13: 513–526
Symons D (1979) The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Symons D (1995) Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: the evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In: Abramson PR, Pinker SD (eds) Sexual nature/sexual culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 80–118
Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (1993) Human facial beauty: averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nat 4: 237–269
Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (1999) Facial attractiveness. Trends Cognitive Sci 3: 452–460
Thornhill R, Grammer K (1999) The body and face of woman: one ornament that signals quality? Evol Human Behav 20: 105–120
Thornhill R, Moller AP (1997) Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biol Rev 72: 497–548
Troost JM (1998) Empirical studies in color constancy. In: Walsh V, Kulikowski J (eds) Perceptual constancy. Why things look as they do. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 262–282
Waibel A, Hanazawa T, Hinton G, Shikano K, Lang K (1989) “Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks;’ IEEE Trans Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing 37 (3): 328–339
Walbott HG (1982) Bewegungsstil and Bewegungsqualität: Untersuchungen zum Ausdruck and Eindruck gestischen Verhaltens. Beltz, Weinheim
Williams JHG, Whiten A, Suddendorf T, Perrett DI (2001) Imitation, mirror neurons and autism. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25: 287–295
Witte H, Preuschoft H, Recknagel S (1991) Human body proportions explained on the basis of biomechanical principles. Z Morphol Anthropol 78 (3): 407–423
Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection–a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53: 205–214
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grammer, K., Keki, V., Striebel, B., Atzmüller, M., Fink, B. (2003). Bodies in Motion: A Window to the Soul. In: Voland, E., Grammer, K. (eds) Evolutionary Aesthetics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07142-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07142-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07822-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07142-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive