Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Welfare States and Their Inequality as a Result of Cultural Differences Instead of Varieties of Capitalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Inequality: Social Costs and Benefits

Abstract

Social inequality depends crucially on how welfare states and different types of capitalisms distribute and redistribute income. But why do welfare states and capitalisms differ in a way that brings about different types of inequality in the first place? Contrary to the claims of the varieties of capitalism typology, this paper shows that comparative advantage in different economic sectors does not explain why capitalist countries use the market to differing degrees, leading to different types of welfare states. Instead, religiously inspired cultural differences between countries explain types of welfare states and thus indirectly the inequality that they result in. Liberal countries have populations with market-friendly attitudes, while coordinated countries have market-sceptical populations. This chapter therefore argues that the notion of a cultural policy style explains the emergence and persistence not only of different welfare states, but also of liberal and coordinated capitalisms. Notably, Calvinism and the social values it promoted led to liberal market economies, while Catholicism and Lutheranism promoted two types of coordinated market economies, one with group-based and one with nation-based solidarity, each of which have different implications for the type of inequality that countries are willing to accept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alcock, Pete/Gary Craig, 2001: The United Kingdom: Rolling Back the Welfare State? In: Pete Alcock/Gary Craig (ed.), International Social Policy. Welfare Regimes in the Developed World. New York: Palgrave, 124–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Uwe, 2007: Open Systemness and Contested Reference Frames and Change. A Reformulation of the Varieties of Capitalism Theory. In: Socio-Economic Review 5, 261–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, Anthony Harold, 1955: Federalism, Finance, and Social Legislation in Canada, Australia, and the United States. Oxford,: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, David, 2009: Rich Democracies, Poor People: How Politics Explain Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, David/Benjamin Sosnaud, 2010: The Politics of Economic Inequality. In: Kevin Leicht/Craig Jenkins (ed.), Handbook of Politics: State and Society in Global Perspective. New York: Springer, 521–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, Janine, 2003: The Welfare State in Canada. In: Christian Aspalter (ed.), Welfare Capitalism Around the World. Taichung: Casa Verde Publishing, 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Clem/Jeff Manza, 2007: Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, Lois, 2001: Australia: The Transformation of the Wage-Earner’ Welfare State. In: Pete Alcock/Gary Craig (ed.), International Social Policy. Welfare Regimes in the Developed World. New York: Palgrave, 64–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis, 1993: Changing Course in Economic Policy: The English-Speaking Nations in the 1980s. In: Francis Castles (ed.), Families of Nations: Public Policy in Western Democracies. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth University Press, 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clasen, Jochen/Alexander Goerne, 2011: Exit Bismarck, Enter Dualism? Assessing Contemporary German Labour Market Policy. In: Journal of Social Policy 40, 795–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin, 1993: Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin/Martin Schröder/Helmut Voelzkow, 2009: Regional and Sectoral Varieties of Capitalism. In: Economy and Society 38, 654–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, Frank, 1994: Forging Industrial Policy. The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, Bernhard, 2006: Reforming Early Retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIRO, 2009a: Austria: Industrial Relations Profile. <http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/country/austria.pdf>

  • EIRO, 2009b: Norway: Industrial Relations Profile. <http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/country/norway.pdf>

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 1990: The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 1996: Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estevez-Abe, Margarita/Torben Iversen/David Soskice, 2001: Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State. In: Peter Hall/David Soskice (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 145–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert E., et al., 1999: The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, Jacob S./Paul Pierson, 2010: Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – And Turned its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter, 1999: The Political Economy of Europe in an Era of Interdependence. In: Herbert Kitschelt, et al. (ed.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A./Kathleen Thelen, 2009: Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism. In: Socio-Economic Review 7, 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter/Daniel W. Gingerich, 2009: Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis. In: British Journal of Political Science 39, 449–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter/David Soskice, 2001a: An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: Peter Hall/David Soskice (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter/David Soskice (ed.), 2001b: Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, Anton/Brigitte Unger/Jelle Visser, 2000: How Small Countries Negotiate Change. Twenty-Five Years of Policy Adjustment in Austria, the Netherlands, and Belgium. In: Fritz W. Scharpf/Vivien A. Schmidt (ed.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Volume II. Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, Roger, 1997: The Institutional Embeddedness of American Capitalism. In: Colin Crouch/Wolfgang Streeck (ed.), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London: Sage, 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höpner, Martin, 2005: What Connects Industrial Relations and Corporate Governance? Explaining Institutional Complementarity. In: Socio-Economic Review 3, 331–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel, 1993: The Clash of Civilizations? In: Foreign Affairs 72, 22–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben/David Soskice, 2006: Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others. In: American Political Science Review 100, 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben/David Soskice, 2009: Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century. In: World Politics 61, 438–486. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S004388710900015X>

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben/Anne Wren, 1998: Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint – The Trilemma of the Service Economy. In: World Politics 50, 507–546. <<Go to ISI> ://000075005500001>

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, Sigrun, 2005: The Religious Roots of Modern Poverty Policy: Catholic, Lutheran, and Reformed Protestant Traditions Compared. In: Archives Européennes de Sociologie 46, 91–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, Sigrun, 2009: Religious Doctrines and Poor Relief: A Different Causal Pathway. In: Philip Manow/Kees van Kersbergen (ed.), Religion, Class Coalitions and Welfare States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 267–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter J., 1984: Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland, and the Politics of Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, Kees van, 1995: Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, Kees van/Philip Manow (ed.), 2009: Religion, Class Coalitions, and Welfare States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, Kees van/Philip Manow, 2010: Religion. In: Francis G. Castles, et al. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter, 1985: Power Resources Approach Vs. Action and Conflict: On Causal and Intentional Explanations in the Study of Power. In: Sociological Theory 3, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter, 2006: Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists. In: World Politics 58, 167–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudrle, Robert T./Theodore R. Marmor, 1981: The Development of Welfare States in North America. In: Flora Peter/Arnold J. Heidenheimer (ed.), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 81–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnle, Stein, 1981: The Growth of Social Insurance Programs in Scandinavia: Outside Influences and Internal Forces. In: Flora Peter/Arnold J. Heidenheimer (ed.), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin/Stein Rokkan, 1967: Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In: Seymour M. Lipset/Stein Rokkan (ed.), Party systems and voter aligments: Cross-national perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael, 1993: The Sources of Social Power: Volume 2, The Rise of Classes and Nation States 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manow, Philip, 2009: Electoral Rules, Class Coalitions and Welfare State Regimes, or how to Explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan. In: Socio-Economic Review 7, 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Cathie J./Duane Swank, 2012: The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Cathie Jo/Duane Swank, 2011: Gonna Party Like It’s 1899: Party Systems and the Origins of Varieties of Coordination. In: World Politics 63, 78–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Karl Ulrich, 2009: New Directions in Life Course Research. In: Annual Review of Sociology 35, 413–433. <http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134619>

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschella, Manuela, 2011: Different Varieties of Capitalism? British and Italian Recapitalization Policies in Response to the Sub-prime Crisis. In: Comparative European Politics 9, 76–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles, John, 1996: When Markets Fail: Social Welfare in Canada and the United States. In: Gosta Esping-Andersen (ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage, 116–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palier, Bruno (ed.), 2010: A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reforms in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palier, Bruno, 2011: Understanding the Reform Trajectory of the Bismarckian Welfare Systems. Paper for presentation at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. With excerpts from the book: A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reforms in Continental Europe by Bruno Palier. Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, Jamie/Nik Theodore, 2007: Variegated Capitalism. In: Progress in Human Geography 31, 731–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien A., 2000: Values and Discourse in the Politics of Adjustment. In: Fritz W. Scharpf/Vivien A. Schmidt (ed.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Volume I. From Vulnerability to Competitiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 229–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, Martin, 2009: Integrating Welfare and Production Typologies. How Refinements of the Varieties of Capitalism Approach Call for a Combination with Welfare Typologies. In: Journal of Social Policy 38, 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, Martin, 2013: Integrating Varieties of Capitalism and Welfare State Research: A Unified Typology of Capitalisms. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Herman, 2000: Internationalization and Two Liberal Welfare States. Australia and New Zealand. In: Fritz W. Scharpf/Vivien A. Schmidt (ed.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Volume II. Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam, 1979 [1776]: The Wealth of Nations. Edited by Andrew Skinner. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, David, 1999: Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In: Herbert Kitschelt, et al. (ed.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, David/Torben Iversen, 2001: An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences. In: American Political Science Review 95, 875–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, Sven, 2010: The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan, and the United States, Cambridge studies in comparative politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, 2009: Re-Forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Eonomy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Mark Zachary, 2004: Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism’s Theory of Technological Innovation. In: International Organization 58, 601–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, Kathleen, 2010: Economic Regulation and Social Solidarity: Conceptual and Analytic Innovations in the study of Advanced Capitalism. In: Socio-Economic Review 8, 187–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, Kathleen, 2012: Varieties of Capitalism: Trajectories of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. In: Annual Review of Political Science 15, 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, Kathleen Ann, 2014: Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity, Cambridge Studies in Comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorkildsen, Dag, 1997: Religious Identity and Nordic Identity. In: Oystein Sorensen/Bo Strath (ed.), The Cultural Construction of Norden. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 138–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max, 2002 [1905]: The Protestant Ethic and the ‘Spirit’ of Capitalism and other Writings. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marburg, Deutschland

    Martin Schröder

Authors
  1. Martin Schröder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Schröder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Zeppelin Universität, Friedrichshafen, Germany

    Amanda Machin

  2. Karl Mannheim Cultural Studies, Zeppelin Universität, Friedrichshafen, Germany

    Nico Stehr

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schröder, M. (2016). Welfare States and Their Inequality as a Result of Cultural Differences Instead of Varieties of Capitalism. In: Machin, A., Stehr, N. (eds) Understanding Inequality: Social Costs and Benefits. zu | schriften der Zeppelin Universität. zwischen Wirtschaft, Kultur und Politik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11663-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11663-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-11662-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-11663-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation