Skip to main content

Webcare as Customer Relationship and Reputation Management? Motives for Negative Electronic Word of Mouth and Their Effect on Webcare Receptiveness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. IV)

Part of the book series: EAA Series ((EAA))

Abstract

Social media enable consumers to easily share satisfying or unsatisfying consumption experiences with a multitude of other consumers. The result is a wealth of electronic word of mouth (eWOM), varying in tone from very positive to very negative. For companies, the circulation of negative eWOM is a source of great concern. Unsatisfactory consumption experiences, which were previously communicated as complaints only to a company representative or a few peers, are now publicly available through negative eWOM, which can seriously damage a company’s reputation and sales (e.g., Van Laer and De Ruyter, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, J. (1964), “An Introduction to Motivation,” Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M, ; Booms, B. H.; and M. St. Tetreault (1990), “The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favor-able and Unfavorable Incidents,” in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54(1),71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J. G.; and E. Katz (1974), “The Uses of Mass Communication,” Cage, Newbury Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitsohl , J.; Khammash, M. and G. Griffiths (2010), “E-business Complaint Management: Percep-tions and perspectives of online credibility,” in: Journal of Enterprise Information Manage-ment, Vol. 23(5),653–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, F. and R. De Hoog (2011), “Vacationers and eWOM: Who Posts, and Why, Where, and What?,” in: Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 50(1),15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. A. and D. Mayzlin, (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,” in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 43(3),345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, N. E. and J. A. Danowski (1980), “Process Gratifications in Aging Cohorts, in: Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 57(2),269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, P. J. and R. T. Rust (1996), “Indirect Financial Benefits from Service Quality,” in: Quality Management Journal,Vol. 2, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dichter, E. (1964), “Handbook of Consumer Motivations: The Psychology of the World of Ob-jects,” McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estelami, H. (2000), “Competitive and Procedural Determinants of Delight and Disappointment in Consumer Complaint Outcomes,” in: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 2(3),285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. and J, Avery (2011), “The Uninvited Brand,” in: Business Horizons, 54(3),193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart , C. W. L.; Heskett, J. L. and W. E. Sasser (1990), “The Profitable Art of Service Recovery,” in: Harvard Business Review,Vol. 68, 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havenstein, H. (2007, August 24), “Facebook users resisting Wal-Mart’s latest web 2.0 endeavor,” Retrieved from http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9032718/Facebook_users_resisting_ Wal_Mart_s_latest_Web_2.0_endeavor

  • Hennig-Thurau , T.; Gwinner, K. P.; Walsh, G. and D. D. Gremler (2004), “Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Them-selves on the Internet?,” in”: Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 18(1),38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y.-Y. and W.-N. Lee (2005), “Consumer Complaint Behavior in the Online Environment,” in: Y. Gao (2005) (ed.): Web Systems Design and Online Consumer Behavior,Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, 90–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen , B. J.; Zhang, M.; Sobel, K. and A. Chowdury (2009), “Twitter Power: Tweets as Electronic Word of Mouth,” in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 60(11),2169–2188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof , P.; Beukeboom, C. and S. Utz (2010, February), “Het Vermenselijken van een Bedrijf: Effecten van Persoonlijke vs. Onpersoonlijke Bedrijfsreacties op Negatieve Online Con-

    Google Scholar 

  • sumenten Reviews [The Humanization of a Company: Effects of Personal vs. Impersonal Or-ganizational Reactions to Negative Online Consumer Reviews], Paper presented at the Etmaal van de Communicatiewetenschap, Gent, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, S. and S. U. Kucuk (2009), “Anti-branding on the Internet,” in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62(11),1119–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. L. and S. Song (2010), “An Empirical Investigation of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informa-tional Motive and Corporate Response Strategy, in: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26(5),1073–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. E. and D. boyd (2011), “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Con-text Collapse, and the Imaged Audience,” in: New Media and Society, Vol. 13(1),114–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCollough , M. A.; Berry, L. L. and M. S. Yadav (2000), "An Empirical Investigation of Custom-er Satisfaction After Service Failure and Recovery," in: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 3(2),121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. and L. Becker (1981), “The Uses and Gratifications Approach,” in Nimmo, D. and Sanders, K. (1981) (Eds.): Handbook of Political Communication,Sage, Thousand Oaks, Cal-ifornia, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntinga , D. G.; Moorman, M. and E. G. Smit (2011), “ Introducing COBRAs: Exploring Motiva-tions for Brand-related Social Media Use,” in: International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 30(1),13–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyer, P. U. and M. Gopinath (2005), “Effects of Complaining versus Negative Word of Mouth on Subsequent Changes in Satisfaction: The Role of Public Commitment,” in: Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 22(12),937–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman , A.; Zeithaml, V. A. and L. L. Berry (1998), “Servqual: A Multiple-item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality,” in: Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64(1),12–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, T. E. (2000), “Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century,” in: Mass Communi-cation and Society, Vol. 3(1),3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A K. and R. N. Bolton (1998), "An Experimental Investigation of Customer Reactions to Service Failure and Recovery Encounters: Paradox or Peril," in: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 1(1),5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram , D. S.; Mitra, K. and C. Webster (1998), “Word-of-Mouth Communications: A Motiva-tional Analysis,” in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25, 527–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuzovic, S. (2010), “Frequent (flier) Frustration and the Dark Side of Word-of-Web: Exploring Online Dysfunctional Behavior in Online Feedback Forums,” in: Journal of Services Market-ing, Vol. 24(6),446–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Laer, T. and K. De Ruyter (2010), “In Stories we Trust: How Narrative Apologies Provide Cover for Competitive Vulnerability after Integrity-violating Blog Posts,” in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 27(2),164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Noort, G. and L. M. Willemsen (2012), “Online Damage Control: The Effects of Proactive versus Reactive Webcare Interventions in Consumer-generated and Brand-generated Plat-forms,” in: Journal of Interactive Marketing,Vol. 26(3),131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ossenbruggen, R.; Vonk, T. W. E.; Vonk, M. C. C. and P. M. Willems (2008), “Het Neder-lands Online Panel Vergelijkingsonderzoek 2006 [Dutch Online Panel Comparison Research 2006]. In: Bronner, A. E. et al. (2008) (Eds.): Ontwikkelingen in het marktonderzoek: Jaar-boek 2008 MarktOnderzoekAssociatie [Advances in Market Research: Yearbook 2012 Mar-ket Research Association], Spaar en Hout, Haarlem, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. A. and A. L. Ostrom (2006), “Complaining to the Masses: The Role of Protest Framing in Customer-created Complaint Web Sites,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 33(2),220–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. (2000), “What is it That I’m Trying to Achieve? Classroom Goals From a Content Perspective,” in: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 25(1),105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemsen , L. M.; Neijens, P. C.; Bronner, F. and J. A. De (2011), “Highly recommended! The Content Characteristics and Perceived Usefulness of Online Consumer Reviews,” in: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 17(1),19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, K. H. and U. Gretzel (2008), “What Motivates Consumers to Write Online Travel Reviews?,” in: Information Technology and Tourism, Vol. 10(4),283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lotte Willemsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Willemsen, L., Neijens, P., Bronner, F. (2013). Webcare as Customer Relationship and Reputation Management? Motives for Negative Electronic Word of Mouth and Their Effect on Webcare Receptiveness. In: Rosengren, S., Dahlén, M., Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. IV). EAA Series. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02365-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics