Abstract
This chapter contributes to the literature on the dyad creative design versus analytical assessment. It describes the challenges of creating a planning support system acceptable by designers, and reports the success of combining two planning support tools: Phoenix, an easy-to-use natural user-interface (using multitouch and physical objects input) for spatial design and Urban Strategy, a framework for integrating advanced environmental and socio-economic models for urban sustainability analysis. The systems were developed in different circumstances, contexts, by and for different groups, but their combination unlocked the key to user acceptance and adoption. Their extremely low learning curve attracts even the most technophobic stakeholders and makes use of recent advances in cloud computing for storage and processing to deliver immediate feedback. It allows anyone (especially designers) to sketch their solutions with natural movements and immediately receive feedback on key indicators of the sustainability performance, enabling iterative improvements of designs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arciniegas G, Janssen R, Omtzigt N (2011) Map-based multicriteria analysis to support interactive land use allocation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(12):1931–1947
Arciniegas G, Janssen R, Rietveld P (2012) Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: results of an experiment. Environ Model Softw
Beukers E, Bertolini L, Te Brömmelstroet M (2012) Why Cost Benefit Analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: a process perspective. Trans Res Part A Policy Pract 46(1):68–78
Dangermond J (2010) GeoDesign and GIS: designing our future. In: Buhmann E, Pietsch M, Kretzler E (eds) Proceedings of digita landscape architecture, Wichmann, pp 502–514
Ervin S (2011) A system for GeoDesign. In: Buhmann E et al (eds) Proceedings of digital landscape architecture, LE:NOTRE, pp 145–154
Faludi A, van der Valk AJ (1994) Rule and order Dutch planning doctrine in the twentieth century, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht and Boston
Flaxman M (2010) Fundamentals of Geodesign. In: Buhmann E, Pietsch M, Kretzler E (eds) Proceedings of digital landscape architecture, Wichmann, pp 28–41
Geertman S, Stillwell J (2003) Planning support systems in practice. Springer, New York
Geertman S, Stillwell J (2009) Planning support systems: content, issues and trends. In: Geertman S, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems best practice and new methods, Springer, pp 1–26
Goldberg DE, Holland JH (1988) Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Mach Learn 3(2–3):95–99
Harris B (1960) Plan or projection: an examination of the use of models in planning. J Am Inst Planners 26(4):265–272
Harris B (1965) New tools for planning. J Am Inst Planners 31(2):90–95
Jacobs C, Koomen E (2010) A GIS-assisted method for defining an integrated vision of a climate proof Groningen. In: Painho M, Santos MY, Pundt H (eds) Proceedings of the 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information science, Guimarães, Portugal: AGILE
Ligtenberg A, Wachowicz M, Bregt AK, Beulens A, Kettenis DL (2004) A design and application of a multi-agent system for simulation of multi-actor spatial planning. J Environ Manage 72(1–2):43–55
McHarg IL (1971) Design with Nature Doubleday/American Museum of Natural History
Schelling A, van Meijeren J, Borst J, Huybregts R, van Campenhout I, Geerlings H (2010) Urban strategy koppelt modellen. Verkeerskunde 4:34–39
Snellen D, van Eck JR, Hilbers H (2011) Nederland in 2040: een land van regios. Ruimtelijke verkenning 2011. In Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving (ed) Colloquium Vervoersplanologisch Speurwerk
Steinitz C (2012) A framework for Geodesign: changing geography by design. ESRI Press, Redlands
Te Brömmelstroet M (2010) Equip the warrior instead of manning the equipment: land use and transport planning support in the Netherlands. J Transp Land Use 3(1):25–41
Te Brömmelstroet M, Schrijnen PM (2010) From planning support systems to mediated planning support: a structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 37(1):3–20
Vonk G, Geertman S (2008) Improving the adoption and use of planning support systems in practice. Appl Spat Anal Policy 1(3):153–173
Vonk G, Geertman S, Schot PP (2005) Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environ Plan A 37(5):909–924
Zwick P (2010) The world beyond GIS. Planning 76(6):20–23
Acknowledgments
This research is funded by the research programme Urban Regions in the Delta (URD), part of the VerDuS-programme (‘Verbinding Duurzame Steden’) of the Netherlands organisation for scientific research (NWO). The authors would specially like to thank Tim Ebben (from Geodan), main developer of the Phoenix tool for his efforts and patience. And to Walter Lohman (from TNO), main developer of Urban Strategy, for sharing his knowledge and his efforts in connecting the tools. Last but not least, to all the policy makers, researchers, experts and citizens who participated in planning workshops using these tools (whose feedback allowed us to improve): thank you for believing in designing a better future!
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dias, E., Linde, M., Rafiee, A., Koomen, E., Scholten, H. (2013). Beauty and Brains: Integrating Easy Spatial Design and Advanced Urban Sustainability Models. In: Geertman, S., Toppen, F., Stillwell, J. (eds) Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, vol 195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37532-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37533-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)