Skip to main content

A Model for Correlated Paired Comparison Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Theoretical and Applied Statistics

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics ((STASSPSS))

Abstract

Paired comparison data arise when objects are compared in couples. This type of data occurs in many applications. Traditional models developed for the analysis of paired comparison data assume independence among all observations, but this seems unrealistic because comparisons with a common object are naturally correlated. A model that introduces correlation between comparisons with at least a common object is discussed. The likelihood function of the proposed model involves the approximation of a high dimensional integral. To overcome numerical difficulties a pairwise likelihood approach is adopted. The methodology is illustrated through the analysis of the 2006/2007 Italian men’s volleyball tournament and the 2008/2009 season of the Italian water polo league.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bellio, R., Varin, C.: A pairwise likelihood approach to generalized linear models with crossed random effects. Stat. Model. 5, 217–227 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradley, R.A., Terry, M.E.: The rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 324–345 (1952)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandler, R.E., Bate, S.: Inference for clustered data using the independence log-likelihood. Biometrika 94, 167–183 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox, D.R., Reid, N.: A note on pseudolikelihood constructed from marginal densities. Biometrika 91, 729–737 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Crainiceanu, C.M., Ruppert, D., Vogelsang, T.J.: Some properties of likelihood ratio tests in linear mixed models. Working Paper, Cornell University (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dittrich, R., Hatzinger, R., Katzenbeisser, W.: Modelling the effect of subject-specific covariates in paired comparison studies with an application to university rankings. Appl. Stat. 47, 511–525 (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellermeier, W., Mader, M., Daniel, P.: Scaling the unpleasantness of sounds according to the BTL model: ratio-scale representation and psychoacoustical analysis. Acta Acust. United Ac. 90, 101–107 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Genz, A., Bretz, F., Miwa, T., Mi, X., Leisch, F., Scheipl, F., Hothorn, T.: mvtnorm: Multivariate normal and t distributions. R package version 0.9–92 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lindsay, B.G.: Composite likelihood methods. Contemp. Math. 80, 221–239 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Matthews, J.N.S., Morris, K.P.: An application of Bradley–Terry-type models to the measurement of pain. Appl. Stat. 44, 243–255 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. McCulloch, C.E., Searle, S.R.: Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models. Wiley, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Molenberghs, G., Verbeke, G.: Models for Discrete Longitudinal Data. Springer, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mosteller, F.: Remarks on the method of paired comparisons. I. The least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations. Psychometrika 16, 203–206 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pace, L., Salvan, A., Sartori, N.: Adjusting composite likelihood ratio statistics. Stat. Sin. 21, 129–148 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R Development core team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stuart-Fox, D.M., Firth, D., Moussalli, A., Whiting, M.J.: Multiple signals in chameleon contests: designing and analysing animal contests as a tournament. Anim. Behav. 71, 1263–1271 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thurstone, L.L.: A law of comparative judgement. Psychol. Rev. 34, 273–286 (1927)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Varin, C., Reid, N., Firth, D.: An overview of composite likelihood methods. Stat. Sin. 21, 5–42 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank David Firth for valuable discussion and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Cattelan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cattelan, M., Varin, C. (2013). A Model for Correlated Paired Comparison Data. In: Torelli, N., Pesarin, F., Bar-Hen, A. (eds) Advances in Theoretical and Applied Statistics. Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35588-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics