Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why Trust Seals Don’t Work: A Study of User Perceptions and Behavior

  • Conference paper
Trust and Trustworthy Computing (Trust 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 7344))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Trust seals, such as the VeriSign and TRUSTe logos, are widely used to indicate a website is reputable. But how much protection do they offer to online shoppers? We conducted a study in which 60 experienced online shoppers rated 6 websites – with and without trust seals - based on how trustworthy they perceived them to be. Eye tracking data reveals that 38% of participants failed to notice any of the trust seals present. When seals were noticed, the ratings assigned to each website were significantly higher than for the same website without a seal, but qualitative analysis of the interview data revealed significant misconceptions of their meaning (e.g. “presence of seals automatically legitimizes any website”). Participants tended to rely on self-developed – but inaccurate – heuristics for assessing trustworthiness (e.g. perceived investment in website development, or references to other recognizable entities). We conclude that trust seals currently do not offer effective protection against scam websites; and suggest that other mechanisms – such as automatic verification of authenticity are required to support consumers’ trust decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The UK Cards Association, http://www.financialfraudaction.org.uk/cms/assets/1/be%20card%20smart%20release%20final%20-%2024%20nov%2011%20(nfa).pdf

    Google Scholar 

  2. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M.A., McCarthy, J.D.: The mechanics of trust: a framework for research and design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62(3), 381–422 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Financial Fraud Action UK, http://www.financialfraudaction.org.uk/cms/assets/1/fraud%20figures%20release%2010%20mar%2010.pdf

  4. DirectGov, UK, http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Governmentcitizensandrights/Consumerrights/Howtocomplainaboutgoodsandservices/DG_196229

  5. Publicservice.co.uk, http://www.publicservice.co.uk/news_story.asp?id=18293

  6. Mail Online, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2073344/Will-fall-Santa-frauds-Britain-flooded-designer-Christmas-gifts-actually-dangerous-fakes.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

  7. Retail Digital, http://www.retail-digital.com/consumer_trends/top-retail-scams

  8. BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8392600.stm

  9. UK Cards Association, http://www.theukcardsassociation.org.uk/media_centre/press_releases_new/-/page/1323/

  10. http://www.internetretailer.com/2011/01/18/fraud-losses-fall

  11. Hu, X.R., Lin, Z.X., Zhang, H.: Myth or reality: effect of trust promoting seals in electronic markets. In: Proceeding of the Eleventh Annual Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems (WITS), New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 65–70 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., Kuwabara, K.: Reputation systems: facilitating trust in internet interactions. Communications of the ACM 43(12), 45–48 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, D., Ferrin, D., Rao, H.: A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems 44(2), 544–564 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ba, S., Whinston, A.B., Zhang, H.: Building trust in online auction markets through an economic incentive mechanism. Decis. Support Syst. 35(3), 273–286 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kimery, K.M., McCard, M.: Third-party assurances: mapping the road to trust in e-retailing. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 4(2), 63–82 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rifon, N.J., LaRose, R., Choi, S.M.: Your Privacy Is Sealed: Effects of Web Privacy Seals on Trust and Personal Disclosures. Journal of Consumer Affairs 39, 339–362 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bakos, J.Y., Dellarocas, C.: Cooperation without enforcement? A comparative analysis of litigation and online reputation as quality assurance mechanisms. In: Proc. Internat. Conf. In-form. Systems, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 127–141 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson, D., Meinert, D., Criswell II, J., Crossland, M.: Consumer trust: privacy policies and third-party seals. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 14(4), 654–669 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wash, R.: Folk models of home computer security. In: SOUPS 2010: Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, SOUPS 2010, pp. 1–16. ACM, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Tan, Y., Thoen, W.: Toward a Generic Model of Trust for Electronic Commerce. International Journal of Electronics Commerce 5, 61–74 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nielsen, J., Molich, R., Snyder, S., Farrell, C.: E-Commerce User Experience:Trust. Nielsen Norman Group, Fremont (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jarvenpaa, S., Tractinsky, N., Vitale, M.: Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management 1(1-2), 45–71 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffman, D.L.: Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM 42(4), 80–85 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bolton, G.E., Katok, E., Ockenfels, A.: How Effective Are Electronic Reputation Mechanisms? An Experimental Investigation. Manage. Sci. 50(11), 1587–1602 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ratnasingam, P., Pavlou, P.A.: Technology Trust in Internet-Based Interorganizational Electronic Commerce. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations 1(1), 17–41 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Akerlof, G.: The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3), 488–500 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Handy, C.: Trust and the Virtual Organization. Harvard Business Review 73(3), 40–50 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shneiderman, B.: Designing trust into online experiences. Communications of the ACM 43(12), 57–59 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stajano, F., Wilson, P.: Understanding scam victims: seven principles for systems security. Communications of the ACM 54(3), 70–75 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M.A., McCarthy, J.D.: The researcher’s dilemma: evaluating trust in computer-mediated communication. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 58(6), 759–781 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bacharach, M., Gambetta, D.: Trust as Type Detection. In: Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y. (eds.) Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies, pp. 1–26. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Egger, F.N.: Affective Design of E-Commerce User Interfaces: How to maximise perceived trustworthiness. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Affective Human Factors Design, pp. 317–324 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kirlappos, I., Sasse, M.A.: Security education against phishing: A modest proposal for a major re-think. IEEE Security and Privacy, 99(preprints) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Twyman, M., Harvey, N., Harries, C.: Trust in motives, trust in competence: Separate factors determining the effectiveness of risk communication. Judgment and Decision Making 3, 111–120 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Google Good to Know, http://www.google.co.uk/goodtoknow/online-safety/shopping/

  36. Stay Safe, http://www.staysafeonline.org/

  37. DirectGov UK, http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Nl1/Newsroom/DG_180506

  38. DirectGov UK, http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Governmentcitizensandrights/Consumerrights/Protectyourselffromscams/DG_195960

  39. Harvey, N., Harries, C., Fischer, I.: Using advice and assessing its quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 81, 252–273 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Action Fraud, UK, http://www.actionfraud.org.uk/festival-lovers-must-beware-of-ticketing-fraud-mar11

  41. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE publications, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Edelman, B.: Adverse selection in online ”trust” certifications. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ICEC 2009), pp. 205-212. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Verisign: Report Seal Misuse, https://www.verisign.com/support/contact/seal-abuse/index.html

  44. TRUSTe, http://www.truste.com/consumer-privacy/comparing-web-privacy-seals

  45. Beautement, A., Sasse, M.A., Wonham, M.: The compliance budget: managing secu-rity behaviour in organisations. In: NSPW 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 Workshop on New Security Paradigms, pp. 47–58 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Herley, C.: So long, and no thanks for the externalities: The rational rejection of Security advice by users. In: Proceedings of the New Security Paradigms Workshop 2009, pp. 133–144 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Whitten, A., Tygar, J.D.: Why Johnny can’t encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium (SSYM 1999), vol. 8, p. 14. USENIX Association, Berkeley (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  48. GHD Repair, http://www.ghd-repair.co.uk/fake_ghds.html

  49. Ebay, http://pages.ebay.com/help/account/securing-account.html

  50. SOLID Authentication, https://www.solidauthentication.com

  51. Wu, M., Miller, R.C., Garfinkel, S.L.: Do security toolbars actually prevent phishing attacks? In: Grinter, R., Rodden, T., Aoki, P., Cutrell, E., Jeffries, R., Olson, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2006), pp. 601–610. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom

    Iacovos Kirlappos & M. Angela Sasse

  2. Department of Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom

    Nigel Harvey

Authors
  1. Iacovos Kirlappos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Angela Sasse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nigel Harvey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Technical University Darmstadt, Hochschulstrasse 10, 64289, Darmstadt, Germany

    Stefan Katzenbeisser  & Melanie Volkamer  & 

  2. Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems, Vienna University of Technology and SBA Research, Favoritenstrsse 9-11, 1040, Vienna, Austria

    Edgar Weippl

  3. School of Informatics, Indiana University, 901 East Tenth Street, 47405, Bloomington, IN, USA

    L. Jean Camp

  4. Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 201 S. Columbia Street UNH-CH, 27599-3175, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Mike Reiter

  5. Huawei America R&D, 2330 Central Expressway, 95050, Santa Clara, CA, USA

    Xinwen Zhang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kirlappos, I., Sasse, M.A., Harvey, N. (2012). Why Trust Seals Don’t Work: A Study of User Perceptions and Behavior. In: Katzenbeisser, S., Weippl, E., Camp, L.J., Volkamer, M., Reiter, M., Zhang, X. (eds) Trust and Trustworthy Computing. Trust 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7344. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30921-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30921-2_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30920-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30921-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation