Skip to main content

The Greenhouse Metaphor and the Greenhouse Effect: A Case Study of a Flawed Analogous Model

  • Conference paper
Philosophy and Cognitive Science

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 2))

Abstract

Metaphors are double-edge swords. By connecting an abstract and unknown phenomenon to a tangible and familiar one, a metaphor also creates a new reality. For example, we frequently use a metaphor to describe global warming – the atmosphere works like a greenhouse and CO2 traps heat as panes of glass in a greenhouse do. However, this greenhouse metaphor leads to an ontological assumption that conceptualizes heat as a material-like object, a series of ideas that ignore the roles of the ocean in the process of thermal transfer within the climate system, and an underestimation of the time delay effect in climate change. By producing an illusion that the climate system will respond instantly at the moment when CO2 level is reduced, the greenhouse metaphor is ultimately responsible for the wait-and-see approach to climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E., Wasserman, S.: Object permanence in 5-month-old infants. Cognition 20, 191–208 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M.: Children’s models of understanding of the two major global environmental issues (Ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science & Technological Education 15, 19–28 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S.: The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.: The object bias and the study of scientific revolutions: Lessons from developmental psychology. Philosophical Psychology 20, 479–503 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.: A different kind of revolutionary change: Transformation from object to process concepts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41, 182–191 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.: Why do people misunderstand climate change? Heuristics, mental models and ontological assumptions. Climatic Change 108, 31–46 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.: Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In: Vosniadou, S. (ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, pp. 61–82. Routledge, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiddaman, T.: Feedback complexity in integrated climate-economy models. Ph.D Thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge MA 02142 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J.: Historical perspectives on climate change. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F.: Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalid, T.: Pre-service high school teachers’ perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research 9, 35–50 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moxnes, E.: Overexploitation of renewable resources: The role of misperceptions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 37, 107–127 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., Charusombat, U.: Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research 15, 549–570 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., et al.: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J., Booth Sweeney, L.: Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climate Change 80, 213–238 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Ocean Project, America, the ocean, and climate change: New research insights for conservation, awareness, and action (2009), http://theoceanproject.org/resources.php

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2009), Climate change: Kids site, http://epa.gov/climatechange/kids/greenhouse.html

  • Vosniadou, S.: Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: a developmental perspective. In: Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A. (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, pp. 413–437. Cambridge University Press, New York (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, X. (2012). The Greenhouse Metaphor and the Greenhouse Effect: A Case Study of a Flawed Analogous Model. In: Magnani, L., Li, P. (eds) Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29928-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics