Skip to main content

On Partial Comparability and Fuzzy Preference-Aversion Models

  • Conference paper
Foundations of Intelligent Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 122))

Abstract

A general overview of partial comparability and preference theory allows examining the notion of bipolarity and its role in the development of some general preference structures. This bipolar approach comes natural to the framework of decision theory, where different preference structures can be initially explored according to the type of bipolar model that they follow. Therefore, we compare two general preference structures, the first one, referred to as the PCT structure, which results from a well known axiomatic model for partial comparability theory, and the second one, referred to as the P-A structure, which extends one particular standard fuzzy preference model, such that some basic differences as well as particular similarities are clearly identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aumann, R.: Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica 30, 445–462 (1962)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 23, 866–877 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Franco, C., Montero, J., Rodríguez, J.T.: Aggregation weights for a preference-aversion model. In: Proceedings World Conference on Soft Computing, San Francisco (2010), paper 199

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goguen, J.: The logic of inexact concepts. Synthese 19, 325–373 (1969)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research 6, 1–44 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291 (1979)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Montero, J., Gómez, D., Bustince, H.: On the relevance of some families of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 158, 2429–2442 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Montero, J., Tejada, J., Cutello, C.: A general model for deriving preference structures from data. European Journal of Operational Research 98, 98–110 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Perny, P., Roy, B.: The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49, 33–53 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Perny, P., Tsoukiàs, A.: On the continuous extension of a four valued logic for preference modeling. In: Proceedings IPMU Conference, Paris, France, July 6-10, pp. 302–309 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rodríguez, J.T., Franco, C., Montero, J.: On the relationship between bipolarity and fuzziness. In: Proceedings EUROFUSE Conference, Régua, Portugal, September 21-23 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roy, B.: Partial preference analysis and decision-aid: the fuzzy outranking relation concept. In: Bell, D., Keeney, R., Raiffa, H. (eds.) Conflicting Objectives in Decisions. Wiley and Sons, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Savage, L.: The Foundations of Statistics. Dover Publications, New York (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Schweizer, B., Sklar, A.: Probabilistic Metric Spaces. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, A.: The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Trillas, E.: On a model for the meaning of predicates (A naïve approach to the genesis of fuzzy sets). In: Seising, R. (ed.) Views of Fuzzy Sets and Systems from Different Perspectives, pp. 175–205. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tsoukiás, A., Vincke, P.: A new axiomatic foundation of partial comparability. Theory and Decision 39, 79–114 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: Extended preference structures in MultiCriteria Decision Aid. In: Multicriteria Analysis. Springer, Berlin (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1953)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Franco, C., Montero, J., Rodríguez, J.T. (2011). On Partial Comparability and Fuzzy Preference-Aversion Models. In: Wang, Y., Li, T. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 122. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25664-6_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25664-6_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25663-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25664-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics