Abstract
The link between affect, defined as the capacity for sentimental arousal on the part of a message, and virality, defined as the probability that it be sent along, is of significant theoretical and practical importance, e.g. for viral marketing. The basic measure of virality in Twitter is the probability of retweet and we are interested in which dimensions of the content of a tweet leads to retweeting. We hypothesize that negative news content is more likely to be retweeted, while for non-news tweets positive sentiments support virality. To test the hypothesis we analyze three corpora: A complete sample of tweets about the COP15 climate summit, a random sample of tweets, and a general text corpus including news. The latter allows us to train a classifier that can distinguish tweets that carry news and non-news information. We present evidence that negative sentiment enhances virality in the news segment, but not in the non-news segment. Our findings may be summarized ‘If you want to be cited: Sweet talk your friends or serve bad news to the public’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahonen, T., Moore, A.: Communities Dominate Brands:Business and Marketing Challenges for the 21st Century. FutureText, London, UK (2005)
Berger, J., Milkman, K.: Social transmission, emotion, and the virality of online content. Wharton Research Paper (2010)
Boyd, D., Golder, S., Lotan, G.: Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In: Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2010)
Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual, and affective ratings. Technical report, Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (1999)
Dobele, A., Lindgreen, A., Beverland, M., Vanhamme, J., Vanwijk, R.: Why pass on viral messages? because they connect emotionally. Business Horizons 50(4), 291–304 (2007)
Eilders, C.: News factors and news decisions. theoretical and methodological advances in germany. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research 31(1), 5–24 (2006)
Francis, W.N., Kucera, H.: Brown corpus manual. Technical report, Department of Linguistics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, US (1979)
Galtung, J., Ruge, M.: The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the congo, cuba and cyprus crises in four norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research 2(1), 64–90 (1965)
Godin, S.: Unleashing the Ideavirus (2001)
Harcup, T., O’Neill, D.: What is news? galtung and ruge revisited. Journalism Studies 2(2), 261–280 (1981)
Honeycutt, C., Herring, S.C.: Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via twitter. In: Proc. 42nd Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, pp. 1–10. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, USA (2009)
Huberman, B., Romero, D., Wu, F.: Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope (December 2008), http://arxiv.org/pdf/0812.1045
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., Tseng, B.: Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In: WebKDD/SNA-KDD 2007, pp. 56–65. ACM, New York (2007)
Kozinets, R., de Valck, K., Wojnicki, A., Wilner, S.: Networked narratives. understanding word of mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing 74, 71–89 (2010)
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Parkand, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: WWW 2010: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 591–600. ACM, New York (2010)
Lazarsfeldt, P., Katz, E.: Personal Influence. The Free Press, Glecoe (1955)
Leskovec, J., Adamic, L., Huberman, B.: The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web (2007)
Lippman, W.: Public Opinion. MacMillan, New York (1922)
Loper, E., Bird, S.: NLTK: The natural language toolkit. In: Proc. of the ACL-02 Workshop on Effective tools and methodologies for teaching natural language processing and computational linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 63–70. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown (2002)
Miller, V.: New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence: The Int. Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14(4), 387–400 (2008)
Nelder, J.A., Wedderburn, R.W.M.: Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General 135, 370–384 (1972)
Peterson, S.: International news selection by the elite press: A case study. Public Opinion Quarterly 45(2), 143–163 (1981)
Ravikant, N., Rifkin, A.: Why twitter is massively undervalued compared to facebook (2010), http://techcrunch.com
Rish, I.: An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. In: Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 41–46 (2001)
Rogers, E.: Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York (1962)
Ruhrmann, G., Woelke, J., Maier, M., Diehlmann, N.: Der Wert von Nachrichten im deutschen Fernsehen: Ein Modell zur Validierung von Nachrichtenfaktoren. Leske Budrich, New York (2003)
Schulz, W.: News structure and people’s awareness of political events. International Communication Gazette 30, 139–153 (1982)
Schwarz, A.: The theory of newsworthiness applied to Mexico’s press. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research 31(1), 45–64 (2006)
Staab, F.: The role of news factors in news selection: A theoretical reconsideration. European Journal of Communication 5, 423–443 (1990)
Straughan, M.: An experiment on the relation between news values and reader. International Communication Gazette 43, 93–107 (1989)
Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., Chi, E.H.: Want to be retweeted? large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in twitter network. In: Social Computing / IEEE Int. Conf. on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust, pp. 177–184 (2010)
Tarde, G.: The law of Imitation. Holt and Company, New York (1903)
Weng, J., Lim, E.P., Jiang, J., He, Q.: Twitterrank: finding topicsensitive influential twitterers. In: Proc. of the Third ACM Int. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2010, pp. 261–270. ACM, New York (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hansen, L.K., Arvidsson, A., Nielsen, F.A., Colleoni, E., Etter, M. (2011). Good Friends, Bad News - Affect and Virality in Twitter. In: Park, J.J., Yang, L.T., Lee, C. (eds) Future Information Technology. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 185. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22309-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22309-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22308-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22309-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)