Skip to main content

Towards an Investigation of the Conceptual Landscape of Enterprise Architecture

  • Conference paper
Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS 2011, EMMSAD 2011)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss our preliminary work on clarifying the conceptual landscape of Enterprise Architecture. We do so to aid in the integration of conceptual models originating from different communities (of language users, concerns, viewpoints etc.). We propose that discovering the basic ontological structure used by these communities is necessary for the effective integration of models, and that different communities have a distinguishable different central understanding of some categories in their ontology. Our initial results include the description and categorization analysis of several languages and methods used in EA (as used by their creators), which suggest a prototype structure reflecting a community’s focus.

This paper results from the FNR ASINE project of CRP Henri Tudor and the Agile Service Development (ASD) project (http://www.novay.nl/okb/projects/agile-service-development/7628), a collaborative research initiative focused on methods, techniques and tools for the agile development of business services. The ASD project consortium consists of BeInformed, BiZZdesign, CRP Henri Tudor, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, IBM, Novay, O&i, PGGM, RuleManagement Group, Radboud University Nijmegen, TNO, Twente University, Utrecht University, and Voogd & Voogd. The project is part of the program Service Innovation & ICT of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelson, B.: Comparing natural and abstract categories: A case study from computer science. Cognitive Science 9(4), 417 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sci. Comput. Program. 20, 3–50 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dijkman, R.M., Quartel, D.A.C., van Sinderen, M.J.: Consistency in multi-viewpoint design of enterprise information systems. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(7-8), 737–752 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrariolo, D., Cugini, J., Kuhn, R.: Role-based access control (rbac): Features and motivations. In: Proc. of the 11th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gordijn, J., Yu, E., van der Raadt, B.: e-service design using i* and e3value modeling. IEEE Software 23, 26–33 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grau, G., Horkoff, J., Yu, E., Abdulhadi, S.: i* guide 3.0. Internet (August 2007), http://istar.rwth-aachen.de/tiki-index.php?page_ref_id=67

  7. Green, N., Bate, C.: Lost in Translation. Evolved Technologist (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5, 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A.: Freezing language: conceptualisation processes across ICT-supported organisations. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71–79 (January-February 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krogstie, J., Jørgensen, H.D.: Quality of interactive models. In: Olivé, À., Yoshikawa, M., Yu, E.S.K. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2784, pp. 351–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lankhorst, M.M.: Enterprise architecture modelling–the issue of integration. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(4), 205–216 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, L., Yu, E.: From requirements to architectural design - using goals and scenarios. In: Software Requirements to Architectures Workshop, STRAW 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Majid, A., van Staden, M., Boster, J., Bowerman, M.: Event categorization: A cross-linguistic perspective. In: Proc. of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. von Neumann, J.: Theory Of Games And Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Object Management Group: Business process model and notation (bpmn) ftf beta 1 for version 2.0. Internet (2010), http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.0/

  17. Opdahl, A.L., Berio, G.: Interoperable language and model management using the ueml approach. In: Proc. of the 2006 International Workshop on Global Integrated Model Management, pp. 35–42. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., Tannenbaum, P.: The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Patig, S.: Modeling deployment of enterprise applications. In: Soffer, P., Proper, E. (eds.) CAiSE Forum 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 72, pp. 253–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press (June 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosch, E.: Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4(3), 328–350 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheer, A.-W., Nüttgens, M.: ARIS architecture and reference models for business process management. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, p. 376. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. The Open Group: ArchiMate 1.0 Specification. Van Haren Publishing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ulrich, F., Heise, D., Kattenstroth, H., Ferguson, D.F., Hadar, E., Waschke, M.G.: Itml: A domain-specific modeling language for supporting business driven it management. In: Proc. of the 9th OOPSLA Workshop on DSM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Uschold, M., King, M., Moralee, S., Zorgios, Y.: The enterprise ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review 13(01), 31–89 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wyssusek, B.: On ontological foundations of conceptual modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 18, 63–80 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van der Linden, D.J.T., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Lartseva, A., Proper, H.A.(. (2011). Towards an Investigation of the Conceptual Landscape of Enterprise Architecture. In: Halpin, T., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2011 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 81. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21758-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21759-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics