Skip to main content

Interestingness of Association Rules Using Symmetrical Tau and Logistic Regression

  • Conference paper
AI 2009: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5866))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

While association rule mining is one of the most popular data mining techniques, it usually results in many rules, some of which are not considered as interesting or significant for the application at hand. In this paper, we conduct a systematic approach to ascertain the discovered rules and provide a rigorous statistical approach supporting this framework. The strategy proposed combines data mining and statistical measurement techniques, including redundancy analysis, sampling and multivariate statistical analysis, to discard the non significant rules. A real world dataset is used to demonstrate how the proposed unified framework can discard many of the redundant or non significant rules and still preserve high accuracy of the rule set as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Han, J., Kamber, M.: Data mining: concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McGarry, K.: A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 20, 39–61 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Geng, L., Hamilton, H.J.: Interestingness measures for data mining: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 38, 9 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, H., Padmanabhan, B., Tuzhilin, A.: On the discovery of significant statistical quantitative rules. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Philippe, L., Patrick, M., Benoît, V., Stéphane, L.: On selecting interestingness measures for association rules: User oriented description and multiple criteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research 184, 610–626 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Agrawal, R., Imieliski, T., Swami, A.: Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. SIGMOD Rec. 22, 207–216 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aggarwal, C.C., Yu, P.S.: A new framework for itemset generation. Book A new framework for itemset generation. Series A new framework for itemset generation. ACM, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brin, S., Motwani, R., Ullman, J.D., Tsur, S.: Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. ACM SIGMOD Record 26(2), 255–264 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Silverstein, C., Brin, S., Motwani, R.: Beyond Market Baskets: Generalizing Association Rules to Dependence Rules. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2(1), 39–68 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brijs, T., Vanhoof, K., Wets, G.: Defining interestingness for association rules. International Journal of Information Theories and Applications 10(4), 370–376 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Omiecinski, E.R.: Alternative interest measures for mining associations in databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(1), 57–69 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Webb, G.I.: Discovering Significant Patterns. Machine Learning, 1–33 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Piatetsky-Shapiro, G.: Discovery, analysis; and presentation of strong rules. Knowledge discovery in database 229 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, B., Hsu, W., Ma, Y.: Pruning and summarizing the discovered associations. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bay, S.D., Pazzani, M.J.: Detecting Group Differences: Mining Contrast Sets. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 5, 213–246 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Meggido, N., Srikant, R.: Discovering Predictive Association Rules. In: 4th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Databases and Data Mining, pp. 274–278 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Webb, G.I.: Preliminary investigations into statistically valid exploratory rule discovery. In: Australasian Data Mining workshop (AudDM 2003), pp. 1–9 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aumann, Y., Lindell, Y.: A Statistical Theory for Quantitative Association Rules. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 20, 255–283 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goodman, A., Kamath, C., Kumar, V.: Data Analysis in the 21st Century. Stat. Anal. Data Mining 1, 1–3 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohd Shaharanee, I.N., Dillon, T.S., Hadzic, F.: Ascertaining Association Rules using Statistical Analysis. In: Proceeding of the 2009 International Symposium on Computing, Communication and Control, Singapore (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roberto, B., Rakesh, A., Dimitrios, G.: Constraint-Based Rule Mining in Large, Dense Databases. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 4, 217–240 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng, H., Yan, X., Han, J., Yu, P.S.: Direct discriminative pattern mining for effective classification. IEEE, 169–178 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng, H., Yan, X., Han, J., Hsu, C.-W.: Discriminative frequent pattern analysis for effective classification. IEEE, 10 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nada, L., Peter, F., Blaz, Z.: Rule Evaluation Measures: A Unifying View. Inductive Logic Programming, 174–185 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou, X.J., Dillon, T.S.: A statistical-heuristic feature selection criterion for decision tree induction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Agresti, A.: An Intro. to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley-Interscience, New York (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Bovas, A., Johannes, L.: Intro. to Regression Modeling. Brooks/Cole, California (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yanrong, L., Raj, G.: Effective Sampling for Mining Association Rules. In: Webb, G.I., Yu, X. (eds.) AI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3339, pp. 391–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mohd Shaharanee, I.N., Hadzic, F., Dillon, T.S. (2009). Interestingness of Association Rules Using Symmetrical Tau and Logistic Regression. In: Nicholson, A., Li, X. (eds) AI 2009: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5866. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10439-8_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10439-8_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10438-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10439-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics