Skip to main content

Abstract

Organizations and enterprises have developed complex data and information exchange systems that are now vital for their daily operations. Currently available systems, however, face a major challenge. On todays global information infrastructure, data semantics is more and more context- and time-dependent, and cannot be fixed once and for all at design time. Identifying emerging relationships among previously unrelated information items (e.g., during data interchange) may dramatically increase their business value. This chapter introduce and discuss the notion of Emergent Semantics (ES), where both the representation of semantics and the discovery of the proper interpretation of symbols are seen as the result of a selforganizing process performed by distributed agents, exchanging symbols and adaptively developing the proper interpretation via multi-party cooperation and conflict resolution. Emergent data semantics is dynamically dependent on the collective behaviour of large communities of agents, which may have different and even conflicting interests and agendas. This is a research paradigm interpreting semantics from a pragmatic prospective. The chapter introduce this notion providing a discussion on the principles, research area and current state of the art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aberer, K., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Hauswirth, M.: The Chatty Web: Emergent Semantics Through Gossiping. In: Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aberer, K., Mauroux, P.C., Ouksel, A.M., Catarci, T., Hacid, M.S., Illarramendi, A., Kashyap, V., Mecella, M., Mena, E., Neuhold, E.J.: Emergent semantics principles and issues. LNCS, pp. 25–38. Springer, Heidelberg (March 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arenas, M., Kantere, V., Kementsietsidis, A., Kiringa, I., Miller, R.J., Mylopoulos, J.: The hyperion project: From data integration to data coordination. SIGMOD Record 32(3), 53–58 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Artz, D., Gil, Y.: A survey of trust in computer science and the semantic web. Journal ofWeb Semantics (to appear, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Batini, C., Scannapieco, M. (eds.): Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies, and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Batini, C., Scannapieco, M. (eds.): Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies, and Techniques ch. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Batini, C., Scannapieco, M. (eds.): Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies, and Techniques ch. 5. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bonatti, P., Olmedilla, D.: Driving and monitoring provisional trust negotiation with metapolicies. In: POLICY 2005: Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY 2005), pp. 14–23. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonifacio, M., Cuel, R., Mameli, G., Nori, M.: A peer-to-peer architecture for distributed knowledge management. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Multi-Agent Systems, Large Complex Systems, and E-Businesses (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bouquet, P., Magnini, B., Serafini, L., Zanobini, S.: A sat-based algorithm for context matching. In: CONTEXT, pp. 66–79 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bressan, S., Goh, C.H., Fynn, K., Jakobisiak, M., Hussein, K., Kon, H., Lee, T., Madnick, S., Pena, T., Qu, J., Shum, A., Siegel, M.: The Context Interchange Mediator Prototype. In: Proc. SIGMOD 1997, Tucson, AZ (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brogi, A., Corfini, S., Popescu, R.: Flexible Matchmaking of Web Services Using DAML-S Ontologies. In: Proc. Forum of the Second Int. Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC 2004), New York City, NY, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Calvanese, D., Damaggio, E., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Semantic data integration in p2p systems. In: DBISP2P, pp. 77–90 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Logical foundations of peer-to-peer data integration. In: PODS, pp. 241–251 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Casati, F., Shan, M.-C., Georakopoulos, D.: The VLDB Journal: Special Issue on E-Services 10(1) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S.: H-match: an algorithm for dynamically matching ontologies in peer-based systems. In: SWDB, pp. 231–250 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Catarci, T., Lenzerini, M.: Representing and Using Interschema Knowledge in Cooperative Information Systems. Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 2(4) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., Viviani, M.: Bottom-up extraction and trust-based refinement of ontology metadata. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19(2), 149–163 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. The OWL Service Coalition. OWL-S 1.1 release (2004), http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1/

  20. Corcho, Ó.: Ontology based document annotation: trends and open research problems. IJMSO 1(1), 47–57 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Crespo, A., Garcia-Molina, H.: Routing indices for peer-to-peer systems. In: ICDCS, pp. 23 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cudré-Mauroux, P., Aberer, K., Abdelmoty, A.I., Catarci, T., Damiani, E., Illaramendi, A., Jarrar, M., Meersman, R., Neuhold, E.J., Parent, C., Sattler, K.-U., Scannapieco, M., Spaccapietra, S., Spyns, P., Tré, G.D.: Viewpoints on Emergent Semantics. In: Spaccapietra, S., Aberer, K., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics VI. LNCS, vol. 4090, pp. 1–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Cudre-Mauroux, P., Aberer, K., Feher, A.: Probabilistic message passing in peer data management systems. In: ICDE 2006: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2006), p. 41. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Dean, M., Schreiber, G., Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/

  25. Do, H.H., Rahm, E.: Coma - a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In: VLDB, pp. 610–621 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Doan, A., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.Y.: Reconciling schemas of disparate data sources: A machine-learning approach. In: SIGMOD Conference, pp. 509–520 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Dhamankar, R., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.Y.: Learning to match ontologies on the semantic web. VLDB J 12(4), 303–319 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ehrig, M., Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Siebes, R., Staab, S., Stuckenschmidt, H., Studer, R., Tempich, C.: The swap data and metadata model for semantics-based peerto- peer systems. In: Schillo, M., Klusch, M., Müller, J., Tianfield, H. (eds.) MATES 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2831, pp. 144–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ehrig, M., Schmitz, C., Staab, S., Tane, J., Tempich, C.: Towards evaluation of peer-to-peer-based distributed information management systems. In: van Elst, L., Dignum, V., Abecker, A. (eds.) AMKM 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2926, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Esteem Team. Emergent Semantics and Cooperation in MultiKnowledge Environments: the ESTEEM Architecture. In: Proc. of the VLDB Int. Workshop on Semantic Data and Service Integration (SDSI 2007). Vienna, Austria (to appear, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fagin, R., Kolaitis, P.G., Miller, R.J., Popa, L.: Data exchange: Semantics and query answering. In: ICDT, pp. 207–224 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Social Trust: A Cognitive Approach. In: Trust and deception in virtual societies, pp. 55–90. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fan, W., Lu, H., Madnick, S., Cheungd, D.: Discovering and Reconciling Value Conflicts for Numerical Data Integration. Information Systems 26(8) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fensel, D., Benjamins, V.R., Motta, E., Wielinga, B.: UPML: A Framework for Knowledge System Reuse. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 16–23 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fensel, D., Bussler, C., Ding, Y., Omelayenko, B.: The Web Service Modeling Framework WSMF. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 1(2), 113–137 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gambetta, D.: Can we trust trust? In: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, pp. 213–237. Basil Blackwell, Malden (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  37. De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: On reconciling data exchange, data integration, and peer data management. In: PODS, pp. 133–142 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic Matching. Knowledge engineering review 18(3), 265–280 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Grandison, T., Sloman, M.: A Survey of Trust in Internet Applications. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 3(4) (September 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Griffiths, N.: Trust: Challenges and Opportunities. AgentLink News, AgentLink 19, 9–11 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Guha, R.V., McCool, R.: Tap: A semantic web testbed. J. Web Sem. 1(1), 81–87 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Halevy, A.Y., Ives, Z.G., Suciu, D., Tatarinov, I.: Schema mediation in peer data management systems. In: ICDE, p. 505 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hose, K., Klan, D., Sattler, K.-U.: Distributed data summaries for approximate query processing in pdms. In: IDEAS, pp. 37–44 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jarke, M., Lenzerini, M., Vassiliou, Y., Vassiliadis, P. (eds.): Fundamentals of Data Warehouses. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Golbeck, J.H.J., Parsia, B.: Trust networks on the semantic web. In: Proceedings of Cooperative Information Agents 2003, August FebruaryJuly-FebruarySeptember (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jøosang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis. Support Syst. 43(2), 618–644 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jøosang, A., Knapskog, S.J.: A metric for trusted systems. In: Proceedings of the 21st NIST-NCSC National Information Systems Security Conference, pp. 16–29 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kashyap, V.: Trust, but verify: Emergence, trust, and quality in intelligent systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(5) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Keller,U., Lausen, H., Roman, D.: Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO). WSMO Working Draft (2004), http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d2/v02/20040306/

  50. Kementsietsidis, A.: Data sharing and querying for peer-to-peer data management systems. In: EDBT Workshops, pp. 177–186 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kementsietsidis, A., Arenas, M., Miller, R.J.: Mapping data in peer-to-peer systems: Semantics and algorithmic issues. In: SIGMOD Conference, pp. 325–336 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P.A., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Representing and Reasoning about Mappings between Domain Models. In: Proc. of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 14th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Manchala, D.W.: Trust metrics, models and protocols for electronic commerce transactions. In: ICDCS 1998: Proceedings of the The 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, p. 312. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mawlood-Yunis, A., Weiss, M., Santoro, N.: Issues for robust consensus building in p2p networks. In: OTM Workshops, vol. 2, pp. 1021–1027 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  55. McKnight, D.H., Chervany, N.L: The meanings of trust. Technical Report WP 96-04, University of Minnesota, Carlson School of Management (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mihaila, G., Raschid, L., Vidal, M.: Using Quality of Data Metadata for Source Selection and Ranking. In: Suciu, D., Vossen, G. (eds.) WebDB 2000. LNCS, vol. 1997, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Motta, E., Domingue, J., Cabral, L., Gaspari, M.: IRS-II: A Framework and Infrastructure for Semantic Web Services. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 306–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Motta, E., Domingue, J., Cabral, L., Gaspari, M.: METEOR-S Web Service Annotation Framework. In: Proc. of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2004), New York, NY, USA, pp. 553–562 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., Halberstadt, A.: Notions of reputation in multi-agents systems: A review. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S., Korba, L., Singh, M.P. (eds.) AAMAS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2631, pp. 280–287. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Olmedilla, D., Rana, O.F., Matthews, B., Nejdl, W.: Security and trust issues in semantic grids. In: Goble, C., Kesselman, C., Sure, Y. (eds.) Semantic Grid: The Convergence of Technologies, number 05271 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum fuer Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ooi, B.C., Shu, Y., Tan, K.-L.: Relational data sharing in peer-based data management systems. SIGMOD Rec. 32(3), 59–64 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Orlowska, E.: Kripke semantics for knowledge representation logics. Studia Logica, 25 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rabitti, F., Savino, P.: Querying semantic image databases

    Google Scholar 

  64. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB J. 10(4), 334–350 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Ramchurn, S.D., Huynh, D., Jennings, N.R.: Trust in multi-agent systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 19(1), 1–25 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Rasmusson, L., Jansson, S.: Simulated social control for secure internet commerce. In: NSPW 1996: Proceedings of the 1996 workshop on New security paradigms, pp. 18–25. ACM Press, New York (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  67. Richardson, M., Agrawal, R., Domingos, P.: Trust Management for the Semantic Web. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sattler, K., Conrad, S., Saake, G.: Interactive Example- Driven Integration and Reconciliation for Accessing Database Integration. Information Systems 28 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Scannapieco, M., Virgillito, A., Marchetti, C., Mecella, M., Baldoni, R.: The DaQuinCIS Architecture: a Platform for Exchanging and Improving Data Quality in Cooperative Information Systems. Information Systems 29(7), 551–582 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A Survey of Schema-based Matching Approaches. Journal on Data Semantics (JoDS) 4, 146–171 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Staab, S.: Emergent semantics. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17(1), 78–86 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Staab, S., Bhargava, B., Lilien, L., Rosenthal, A., Winslett, M., Sloman, M., Dillon, T.S., Chang, E., Hussain, F.K., Nejdl, W., Olmedilla, D., Kashyap, V.: The pudding of trust. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(5), 74–88 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wang, R.Y., Kon, H.B., Madnick, S.E.: Data Quality Requirements: Analysis and Modeling. In: Proc. ICDE 1993, Vienna, Austria (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Winskel, G.: The formal semantics of programming languages: An introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Yan, L.L., Ozsu, T.: Conflict Tolerant Queries in AURORA. In: Proc. CoopIS 1999, Edinburgh, UK (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Zeng, L., Benatallah, B., Dumas, M., Kalagnanam, J., Chang, H.: QoS-Aware Middleware for Web Services Composition. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(5), 311–327 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Richi Nayak Nikhi Ichalkaranje Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aiello, C., Catarci, T., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., Scannapieco, M., Viviani, M. (2008). Emergent Semantics in Distributed Knowledge Management. In: Nayak, R., Ichalkaranje, N., Jain, L.C. (eds) Evolution of the Web in Artificial Intelligence Environments. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79140-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79140-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79139-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79140-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics