Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical Teleradiology: Collaboration over the Web During Interventional Radiology Procedures

  • Chapter
Teleradiology

  • 815 Accesses

Abstract

Web-based collaborative clinical teleradiology can be looked upon as a set of services for quality assurance that enables expertise sharing and furthers health education opportunities. In particular, this set of services is a requisite of optimizing the final outcomes: structuring a common collaborative educational basis able to connect simultaneously distributed educators, students, and less experienced interventionists; eliminating the radiation dose constraints that arise from the continuous physical presence in the catheter laboratory of a high-volume center; and minimizing travel costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bashshur R, Shannon G, Sapci H (2005) Telemedicine evaluation. Telemed J E-Health 11(3):296-316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Begg L, Chan FY, Edie G, Hockey R, Wootton R (2001) Minimum acceptable stand-ards for digital compression of a fetal ultrasound video-clip. J Telemed Telecare 7(Suppl 2):88-90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergh B, Schlaefke A, Pietsch M, Garcia I, Vogl TJ (2003) Evaluation of a “no-cost” Inter-net technology-based system for teleradiology and co-operative work. Eur Radiol 13(2): 425-434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boehm T, Handgraetinger O, Link J et al (2004) Evaluation of radiological workstations and web-browser-based image distribution clients for a PACS project in hands-on work-shops. Eur Radiol 14(5):908-914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brennecke R, Burgel U, Rippin G, Post F, Rupprecht HJ, Meyer J (2001) Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 17(1):1-12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caffery L, Manthey K (2004) Implementation of a web-based teleradiology management system. J Telemed Telecare 10(Suppl 1):22-25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper JB, Barron D, Blum R, et al (2000) Video teleconferencing with realistic simulation for medical education. J Clin Anesth 12(3):256-261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duffy JR, Werven GW, Aronson AE (1997) Telemedicine and the diagnosis of speech and language disorders. Mayo Clin Proc 72(12):1116-1122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garrison W (2001) Video streaming into the mainstream. J Audiovis Media Med 24(4):174-178

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gomez EJ, Caballero PJ, Malpica N, Del Pozo F (2001) Optimisation and evaluation of an asynchronous transfer mode teleradiology co-operative system: the experience of the emerald and the bonaparte projects. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 64(3): 201-214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gortzis L, Karnabatidis D, Siablis D, Nikiforidis G (2006) Clinical-oriented collabora-tive work over web during interventional radiological procedures. Telemed E-Health 12 (4):448-456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gortzis GL, Papadopoulos H, Roelofs AT et al (2007) Collaborative work during inter-ventional radiological procedures based on a multicast satellite-terrestrial network. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 11(5):597-599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Green RM (2000) Collaboration between vascular surgeons and interventional radiolo-gists: reflections after two years. J Vasc Surg 31(4):826-830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu PJ, Chau PYK, Liu Sheng OR, Yan Tam K (1999) Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J Manage Inform Syst 91-112

    Google Scholar 

  15. Itu-T Rec. H-261,(1993)“Video CODEC for Audiovisual services at p X 64 kbit/s”

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jacob AL, Regazzoni P, Steinbrich W, Messmer P (2000) The multifunctional therapy room of the future: image guidance, interdisciplinarity, integration and impact on patient pathways. Eur Radiol 10(11):1763-1739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lamonte MP, Bahouth MN, Hu P et al (2003) Telemedicine for acute stroke: triumphs and pitfalls. Stroke 34(3):725-728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Luccichenti G, Ngo Dinh N, Cademartiri F, Evangelisti G, Paolillo A, Bastianello S (2004) Teleradiology system accessible through a common web browser. Radiol Med (Torino) 108 (5-6):542-548

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luney SR (2002) Interventional radiology. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 15(4):449-454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marpe D, Cycon H (1999) Very low bit-rate video coding using wavelet-based techniques. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 9(1):85-94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miyashita T, Takizawa M, Nakai K et al (2003) Realtime ultrasound screening by satellite telecommunication. J Telemed Telecare 9(Suppl 1):S60-S61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mun SK, Tohme WG, Platenberg RC, Choi I (2005) Teleradiology and emerging business models. J Telemed Telecare 11(6):271-275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Munteanu A, Cornelis J, Cristea P (1999) Wavelet-based lossless compression of coronary angiographic images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18(3):272-281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nishino M, Busch JM, Wei J, Barbaras L, Yam CS, Hatabu H (2004) Use of personal digital assistants in diagnostic radiology resident education. Acad Radiol 11(10):1153-1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Raman B, Raman R, Raman L, Beaulieu CF (2004) Radiology on handheld devices: image display, manipulation, and PACS integration issues. Radiographics 24(1):299-310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scarsbrook AF, Graham RN, Perriss RW (2006) Radiology education: a glimpse into the future. Clin Radiol 61(8):640-648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheng OR, Hu PJ, Chau PY et al (1998) A survey of physicians’ acceptance of telemedi-cine. J Telemed Telecare 4(Suppl 1):100-102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tyrer HW, Wiedemeier PD, Cattlet RW (2001) Rural telemedicine: satellites and fiber optics. Biomed Sci Instrum 37:417-422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Varga-Atkins T, Cooper H (2005) Developing e-learning for interprofessional education. J Telemed Telecare 11(Suppl 1):102-104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Verdun FR, Aroua A, Trueb PR, Vock P, Valley JF (2005) Diagnostic and interventional radiology: a strategy to introduce reference dose level taking into account the national practice. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114(1-3):188-191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Welz R, Ligier Y, Ratib O (1995) Design of a cooperative teleradiology system. Telemed J 1(3):195-201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wright R, Loughrey C (1995) Teleradiology. BMJ 310(6991):1392-1393

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yagi Y, Gilbertson JR (2005) Digital imaging in pathology: the case for standardization. J Telemed Telecare 11(3):109-116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yamakawa T, Toyabe S, Cao P, Akazawa K (2004) Web-based delivery of medical multime-dia contents using an MPEG-4 system. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 75(3):259-264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yamauchi K, Ikeda M, Ota Y et al (2000) Evaluation of the space collaboration system: its history, image quality and effectiveness for joint case conference. Nagoya J Med Sci 63 (1-2):19-24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Y, Pham BT, Eckstein MP (2005) Task-based model/human observer evaluation of SPIHT wavelet compression with human visual system-based quantization. Acad Radiol 12 (3):324-336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Physics Department, University of Patras, 265 00, Patras, Greece

    Lefteris G. Gortzis

Authors
  1. Lefteris G. Gortzis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Information Management School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 6051 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260

    Sajeesh Kumar Ph.D.

  2. Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, 1609 N. Warren Bldg 211, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA

    Elizabeth A. Krupinski Ph.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gortzis, L.G. (2008). Clinical Teleradiology: Collaboration over the Web During Interventional Radiology Procedures. In: Kumar, S., Krupinski, E.A. (eds) Teleradiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78871-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78871-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78870-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78871-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation