Skip to main content

Multi-view Variation Modeling for Scenario Analysis

  • Conference paper
Software Product-Family Engineering (PFE 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3014))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose an approach using scenarios to describe a spectrum of possible futures and analyze them to assess and improve the ease of accommodating new requirements by a system architecture. Variation modeling forms an important part of the analysis. This paper focuses on an approach to variation modeling across multiple architectural views. The models do not only display the variability in these views, but also the relationships between them. In particular, they can show how choices in one view influence choices in the other views.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Save Time and Lives with a Faster, Smarter 3D-RA. WWW, Philips Medical Systems (November 2002), http://www.medical.philips.com/main/news/theme/3dra/3dra.pdf

  2. America, P., Obbink, H., van Ommering, R., van der Linden, F.: CoPAM: A Component-Oriented Platform Architecting Method Family for Product Family Engineering. In: Donohoe, P. (ed.) Software Product Lines: Experience and Research Directions, Proceedings of the First Software Product Lines Conference (SPLC1), Denver, Colorado, August 28-31, pp. 167–180. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Obbink, H., Müller, J.K., America, P., van Ommering, R., Muller, G., van der Sterren, W., Wijnstra, J.G.: COPA: A Component-Oriented Platform Architecting Method for Families of Software-Intensive Electronic Products. In: Tutorial for SPLC1, the First Software Product Line Conference, Denver, Colorado (August 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Malan, R., Bredemeyer, D.: The Visual Architecting Process. White paper (February 2002), http://www.bredemeyer.com/pdf_files/VisualArchitectingProcess.PDF

  6. Hofmeister, C., Nord, R., Soni, D.: Applied Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process, an Introduction. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beck, K.: Test-Driven Development: By Example. The Addison-Wesley Signature Series. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weinberg, G.: Systems Thinking. Dorset House, Quality Software Management New York (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kotler, P.: Marketing Management, 11th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cockburn, A.: Writing Effective Use Cases. The Crystal Collection for Software Professionals. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. America, P., van Wijgerden, J.: Requirements Modeling for Families of Complex Systems. In: van der Linden, F.J. (ed.) IW-SAPF 2000. LNCS, vol. 1951, pp. 199–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Bredemeyer, D.: Software Architecture Workshop (2002), http://www.bredemeyer.com

  14. Gilder, G.: Telecosm: The World After Bandwidth Abundance. Touchstone (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Intel Processor Roadmap. WWW (2003), http://www.intel.com/products/roadmap/

  16. Endian.net roadmap. WWW (2003), http://endian.net/roadmap.asp

  17. van der Linden, F. (ed.): PFE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2290. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Chastek, G.J. (ed.): SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferber, S., Haag, J., Savolainen, J.: Feature Interaction an Dependencies: Modeling Features for Reengineering a Legacy Product Line. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 235–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Muller, G., Müller, J.K., Wijnstra, J.G.: Multi-View Architecting. White paper, Philips Research (March 2003), http://www.extra.research.philips.com/natlab/sysarch/IntegratingCAFCRPaper.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

America, P., Rommes, E., Obbink, H. (2004). Multi-view Variation Modeling for Scenario Analysis. In: van der Linden, F.J. (eds) Software Product-Family Engineering. PFE 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3014. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24667-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24667-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21941-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24667-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics