Skip to main content

Building Two-Way Streets to Implement -Policies that Work for Gender and Science

  • Chapter
GenderChange in Academia

Abstract

In Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering, Londa Schiebinger (2008) gives a succinct and insightful analysis of three levels at which policies in federal agencies have impacted gender and science: (1) research support to increase the participation of women in science; (2) transformation of the structures of institutions to make them more accessible and friendly to women scientists; and (3) reconceptualization of research to include women and gender in its focus and analysis of results. She points out that most agencies, including the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have done quite well at level 1, and that NIH and some of the international agencies, such as the European Union (EU) have begun to focus on level 3, with explicit policies requiring gender and sex differences in focus and analyses (Schiebinger, 2008). In contrast, NSF has done little with level 3, but has begun, particularly through its ADVANCE initiative to work on level 2. Building two-way streets that allow cross-talk and sharing of policies between NSF and NIH might permit each to learn from the other about policies that work for gender and science in the area in which each has done pioneering work. Here, I will provide a brief history of women's programs at NSF, which documents the shift in NSF policies over time from a focus on level 1 to level 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adept.gatech.edu/ptac. Retrieved on June 23, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Advance.gatech.edu. Retrieved on June 23, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Advance.vt.edu. Retrieved on June 23, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. (1945): Science—The endless frontier: A report to the President on a program for postwar scientific research. Reprinted 1990. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutter, M. (1998): Background programs to POWRE. In: Rosser, Sue V./Zieseniss, Mireille L. (Eds.): Final report on professional opportunities for women in research and education (POWRE) workshop. Gainesville, FL: Center for Women’s Studies and Gender Research, Appendix B

    Google Scholar 

  • Edsall, T. (1995, August 15): Pollsters view gender gap as political fixture: White men heed GOP call; women lean to Democrats. The Washington Post, A-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M.A./Goulden, M. (2004): “Do Babies Matter (Part II). Closing the Baby Gap”. Academe, November-December, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (1993): Education and Human Resources Program for Women and Girls Program Announcement (NSF 93–126) Arlington, VA: Author

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (1997). Professional opportunities for women in research and education. Program announcement. Arlington, VA.: Author

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2000): Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2000. Arlington, VA (NSF 00–327)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2001a): ADVANCE. Program solicitation. Arlington, VA: Author

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2001b): ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Awards. http://www.nsf.gov/advance. Retrieved October 1, 2001

  • National Science Foundation. (2005): Research on Gender in Science and Engineering. FY 2005 (GSE). http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm. Retrieved June 23, 2005

  • Rosser, S.V. (2004): The Science Glass Ceiling: Academic Women Scientists and the Struggle to Succeed. New York: Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, S.V./Lane, Eliesh O’Neal. (2002): Key barriers for academic institutions seeking to retain women scientists and engineers: Family-Unfriendly Policies, Low Numbers, Stereotypes, and Harassment. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 8(2): 161–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, S. V./Zieseniss, M. (1998): Final report on professional opportunities for women in research and education (POWRE) workshop. Gainesville, FL: Center for Women’s Studies and Gender Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, L. (2008): Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnert, G./Holton, G. (1995): Who succeeds in science? The gender dimension. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • SRI International (1994): The Visiting Professorships for Women Program: Lowering the hurdles for women in science and engineering. NSF Summary and Comments. (NSF 93–159). Arlington, VA: Author

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Implementation of the NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. Comprehensive Report (Fiscal Year 1997 Tracking Data) Second Revision May 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Wizemann, T.M./Pardue, M. (Eds). (2001): Exploring the Biological contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y./Shauman, K. (2003): Women in Science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Birgit Riegraf Brigitte Aulenbacher Edit Kirsch-Auwärter Ursula Müller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosser, S.V. (2010). Building Two-Way Streets to Implement -Policies that Work for Gender and Science. In: Riegraf, B., Aulenbacher, B., Kirsch-Auwärter, E., Müller, U. (eds) GenderChange in Academia. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92501-1_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics