Abstract
In Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering, Londa Schiebinger (2008) gives a succinct and insightful analysis of three levels at which policies in federal agencies have impacted gender and science: (1) research support to increase the participation of women in science; (2) transformation of the structures of institutions to make them more accessible and friendly to women scientists; and (3) reconceptualization of research to include women and gender in its focus and analysis of results. She points out that most agencies, including the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have done quite well at level 1, and that NIH and some of the international agencies, such as the European Union (EU) have begun to focus on level 3, with explicit policies requiring gender and sex differences in focus and analyses (Schiebinger, 2008). In contrast, NSF has done little with level 3, but has begun, particularly through its ADVANCE initiative to work on level 2. Building two-way streets that allow cross-talk and sharing of policies between NSF and NIH might permit each to learn from the other about policies that work for gender and science in the area in which each has done pioneering work. Here, I will provide a brief history of women's programs at NSF, which documents the shift in NSF policies over time from a focus on level 1 to level 2.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adept.gatech.edu/ptac. Retrieved on June 23, 2005
Advance.gatech.edu. Retrieved on June 23, 2005
Advance.vt.edu. Retrieved on June 23, 2005
Bush, V. (1945): Science—The endless frontier: A report to the President on a program for postwar scientific research. Reprinted 1990. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation
Clutter, M. (1998): Background programs to POWRE. In: Rosser, Sue V./Zieseniss, Mireille L. (Eds.): Final report on professional opportunities for women in research and education (POWRE) workshop. Gainesville, FL: Center for Women’s Studies and Gender Research, Appendix B
Edsall, T. (1995, August 15): Pollsters view gender gap as political fixture: White men heed GOP call; women lean to Democrats. The Washington Post, A-1
Mason, M.A./Goulden, M. (2004): “Do Babies Matter (Part II). Closing the Baby Gap”. Academe, November-December, 2004
National Science Foundation. (1993): Education and Human Resources Program for Women and Girls Program Announcement (NSF 93–126) Arlington, VA: Author
National Science Foundation. (1997). Professional opportunities for women in research and education. Program announcement. Arlington, VA.: Author
National Science Foundation. (2000): Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2000. Arlington, VA (NSF 00–327)
National Science Foundation. (2001a): ADVANCE. Program solicitation. Arlington, VA: Author
National Science Foundation. (2001b): ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Awards. http://www.nsf.gov/advance. Retrieved October 1, 2001
National Science Foundation. (2005): Research on Gender in Science and Engineering. FY 2005 (GSE). http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm. Retrieved June 23, 2005
Rosser, S.V. (2004): The Science Glass Ceiling: Academic Women Scientists and the Struggle to Succeed. New York: Routledge
Rosser, S.V./Lane, Eliesh O’Neal. (2002): Key barriers for academic institutions seeking to retain women scientists and engineers: Family-Unfriendly Policies, Low Numbers, Stereotypes, and Harassment. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 8(2): 161–190
Rosser, S. V./Zieseniss, M. (1998): Final report on professional opportunities for women in research and education (POWRE) workshop. Gainesville, FL: Center for Women’s Studies and Gender Research
Schiebinger, L. (2008): Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Sonnert, G./Holton, G. (1995): Who succeeds in science? The gender dimension. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press
SRI International (1994): The Visiting Professorships for Women Program: Lowering the hurdles for women in science and engineering. NSF Summary and Comments. (NSF 93–159). Arlington, VA: Author
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Implementation of the NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. Comprehensive Report (Fiscal Year 1997 Tracking Data) Second Revision May 2000
Wizemann, T.M./Pardue, M. (Eds). (2001): Exploring the Biological contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press
Xie, Y./Shauman, K. (2003): Women in Science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosser, S.V. (2010). Building Two-Way Streets to Implement -Policies that Work for Gender and Science. In: Riegraf, B., Aulenbacher, B., Kirsch-Auwärter, E., Müller, U. (eds) GenderChange in Academia. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92501-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92501-1_22
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16832-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92501-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)