Skip to main content

Persuasive Cities for Sustainable Wellbeing: Quantified Communities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mobile Web and Intelligent Information Systems (MobiWIS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9847))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Can you imagine a city that feels, understands, and cares about your wellbeing? Future cities will reshape human behavior in countless ways. New strategies and models are required for future urban spaces to properly respond to human activity, environmental conditions, and market dynamics. Persuasive urban systems will play an important role in making cities more livable and resource-efficient by addressing current environmental challenges and enabling healthier routines. Persuasive cities research aims at improving wellbeing across societies through applications of socio-psychological theories and their integration with conceptually new urban designs. This research presents an ecosystem of future cities, describes three generic groups of people depending on their susceptibility to persuasive technology, explains the process of defining behavior change, and provides tools for social engineering of persuasive cities. Advancing this research is important as it scaffolds scientific knowledge on how to design persuasive cities and refines guidelines for practical applications in achieving their emergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Axelrod, R.: On six advances in cooperation theory. Anal. Krit. 22(1), 130–151 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bandura, A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batty, M., Axhausen, K.W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., Portugali, Y.: Smart cities of the future. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214(1), 481–518 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Stoltenberg, C.D.: Processes of social influence: the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Kendall, P.C. (ed.) Advances in Cognitive-Behavioral Research and Therapy, pp. 215–274. Academic Press, San Diego (1985)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Nijkamp, P.: Smart cities in Europe. J. Urban Technol. 18(2), 65–82 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatterjee, S., Price, A.: Healthy living with persuasive technologies: framework, issues, and challenges. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. (JAMIA) 16, 171–178 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deutsch, M.: A theory of cooperation-competition and beyond. Handb. Theor. Soc. Psychol. 2, 275 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Forester, J.: Bicycle Transportation: A Handbook for Cycling Transportation Engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guerin, B., Innes, J.: Social Facilitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ham, J., McCalley, T., Midden, C., Zaalberg, R.: Using persuasive technology to encourage sustainable behavior. In: 6th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Sydney, pp. 83–86. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hancke, G.P., Hancke Jr., G.P.: The role of advanced sensing in smart cities. Sensors 13(1), 393–425 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kock, N.: WarpPLS 5.0 User Manual. ScriptWarp Systems, Laredo, TX (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lapinski, M.K., Rimal, R.N.: An explication of social norms. Commun. Theory 15(2), 127–147 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Malone, T.W., Lepper, M.: Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Snow, R.E., Farr, M.J. (eds.) Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: III. Conative and Affective Process Analyses, pp. 223–253. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mumford, E.: A socio-technical approach to systems design. Requir. Eng. 5(2), 125–133 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogilvie, D.: Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. BMJ 329, 763 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Keefe, D.J.: Theories of persuasion. In: Nabi, R., Oliver, M.B. (eds.) Handbook of Media Processes and Effects. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Richter, J., Friman, M., Gärling, T.: Soft transport policy measures: gaps in knowledge. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 5, 199–215 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stibe, A.: Socially influencing systems: persuading people to engage with publicly displayed Twitter-based systems. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stibe, A.: Towards a framework for socially influencing systems: meta-analysis of four PLS-SEM based studies. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 172–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Wood, J.V.: What is social comparison and how should we study it? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22(5), 520–537 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wunsch, M., Stibe, A., Millonig, A., Seer, S., Chin, R.C.C., Schechtner, K.: Gamification and social dynamics: insights from a corporate cycling campaign. In: Streitz, N., Markopoulos, P. (eds.) DAPI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9749, pp. 494–503. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39862-4_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Wunsch, M., Stibe, A., Millonig, A., Seer, S., Dai, C., Schechtner, K., Chin, R.C.: What makes you bike? Exploring persuasive strategies to encourage low-energy mobility. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 53–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Matthias Wunsch, Alexandra Millonig, Katja Schechtner, Ryan C.C. Chin, Stefan Seer, Chengzen Dai, Felipe Lozano-Landinez, Francesco Pilla, Rosalind Picard, Pattie Maes, Kevin Slavin, Liz Voeller, Christiana von Hippel, Leo Brown, Shin Bin Tan, Austrian Institute of Technology, and the Schoeller Research Center, for their support and contribution to this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnis Stibe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Measurement Items and Combined Loadings

Appendix A: Measurement Items and Combined Loadings

Constructs

Indicators

Load

Social facilitation

I noticed that my colleagues were participating in the Biking Tourney

.880

I noticed how other coworkers rode bikes as part of the Biking Tourney

.826

I recognized that there were other people from my organization biking to work during the Biking Tourney

.799

Cooperation

I noticed that my colleagues cooperated during the Biking Tourney

.897

I noticed how my co-workers encouraged each other to ride during the Biking Tourney

.843

I observed that my colleagues are collaborating during the Biking Tourney

.853

Competition

I was able to follow my organization in standings of the Biking Tourney

.826

I followed how organizations were competing during the Biking Tourney

.852

I noticed how competitive my organization was in the Biking Tourney

.755

Public display

My organization had a public screen which displayed the Biking Tourney standings

.983

I noticed the rankings of Biking Tourney on a public screen in my organization

.962

There was a public screen in my organization for everyone to see the Biking Tourney activity

.977

Rankings

I noticed the ranking of organizations based on total miles ridden

.823

I noticed the ranking of organizations depending on average miles ridden

.910

I noticed the ranking of organizations based on number of employees biking to work

.856

Engagement

The Biking Tourney encouraged me to commute by bike to work

.937

The Biking Tourney motivated me to continue riding my bike to work

.917

I felt engaged in riding to work during the Biking Tourney

.818

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stibe, A., Larson, K. (2016). Persuasive Cities for Sustainable Wellbeing: Quantified Communities. In: Younas, M., Awan, I., Kryvinska, N., Strauss, C., Thanh, D. (eds) Mobile Web and Intelligent Information Systems. MobiWIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9847. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44215-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44215-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44214-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44215-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics