Abstract
This introductory chapter builds on the assumption that the sociopolitical dimensions of mathematics education have been gradually recognised as an important part of mathematics education research. We problematise the process of institutionalising these dimensions as a firm strand of mathematics education research just as “philosophy of mathematics (education)”, “history of mathematics (education)”, “modelling and applications” or “geometry”. This leads us to identify and conceptualise “disorder” as the foundation of the sociopolitical dimensions and accordingly to propose a shift from focussing diversity towards focussing disorder. Finally, we illustrate how the chapters of this book contribute to such an alternative self-conception of sociopolitical research in mathematics education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See the Gödel theorem (Gödel 1931) as an example that should be more or less familiar to most mathematics educators.
- 2.
“We shall not forget that ‘symbolische Ordnung’ makes both in French and English semantic reference to the social system of rules [Regeln] and also to a command [Gebot]; hence, ‘l’ ‘ordre symbolique’ and ‘the symbolic order’ are not only denoting an order [Ordnung] but also a command, referring to the command [Anordnung] to transgress that order.” (Pfaller 2011, p. 26, own translation)
References
Alrø, H., Ravn, O., & Valero, P. (Eds.). (2010). Critical mathematics education: Past, present, and future. Festschrift for Ole Skovsmose. Rotterdam: Sense.
Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., & Valero, P. (Eds.). (2011). Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education. Dodrecht: Springer.
Berger, M., Brodie, K., Frith, V., & le Roux, K. (Eds.). (2013). Proceedings of the Seventh International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (Vol. 1–2). Cape Town: Hansa.
Bishop, A., Tan, H., & Barkatsas, T. (Eds.). (2015). Diversity in mathematics education. Towards inclusive practices. Cham: Springer.
Black, L., Mendick, H., & Solomon, Y. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation. New York: Routledge.
Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
T. Brown & M. Walshaw (Eds.). (2012). Special issue: Mathematics education and contemporary theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2).
T. Brown, J. Williams & Y. Solomon (Eds.). (2016). Special issue: Mathematics education and contemporary theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
Clarkson, P., & Presmeg, N. (Eds.). (2008). Critical issues in mathematics education. New York: Springer.
Clements, M. A. K., Bishop, A., Keitel-Kreidt, C., Kilpatrick, J., & Leung, F. K.-S. (Eds.). (2013). Third international handbook of mathematics education. New York: Springer.
de Freitas, E., & Nolan, K. (Eds.). (2008). Opening the research text: Critical insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematics education. New York: Springer.
Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibnitz and the Baroque. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Forgasz, H., & Rivera, F. (Eds.). (2012). Towards equity in mathematics education. Gender, culture, and diversity. Heidelberg: Springer.
Foucault, M. (2009/1966). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Routledge.
Gates, P., & Vistro-Yu, C. (2003). Is mathematics for all? In A. Bishop, M. A. K. Clements, C. Keitel-Kreidt, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K.-S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 31–74). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gellert, U., Jablonka, E., & Morgan, C. (Eds.). (2010). Proceedings of the Sixth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (Vol. 1–2). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38(1), 173–198.
Guns’n’Roses. (1987). “Welcome to the jungle.” Appetite for Destruction. Geffen. MCD.
Gutiérrez, R. (2013a). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.
R. Gutiérrez (Ed.). (2013b). JRME equity special issue. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1).
Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. London: Taylor & Francis.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Choppin, J., Wagner, D., & Pimm, D. (Eds.). (2012). Equity in discourse for mathematics education. Theories, practices, and policies. Dodrecht: Springer.
Jablonka, E., & Bergsten, C. (2010). Theorising in mathematics education research: Differences in modes and quality. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25–52.
Jablonka, E., Wagner, D., & Walshaw, M. (2013). Theories for studying social, political and cultural dimensions of mathematics education. In A. Bishop, M. A. K. Clements, C. Keitel-Kreidt, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K.-S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 41–67). New York: Springer.
T. Meaney & P. Valero (Eds.). (2014). Socioeconomic influence on mathematical achievement: What is visible and what is neglected. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 46(7).
C. Morgan & C. Kanes (Eds.). (2014). Special issue: Social theory and research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2).
Mukhopadhyay, S., & Greer, B. (Eds.). (2015). Proceedings of the Eighth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (Vol. 1–3). Portland: Ooligan.
Pais, A. (2012). A critical approach to equity in mathematics education. In O. Skovsmose & B. Greer (Eds.), Opening the cage: Critique and politics of mathematics education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Pfaller, R. (2011). Wofür es sich zu leben lohnt: Elemente materialistischer Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Skovsmose, O., & Greer, B. (Eds.). (2012). Opening the cage: Critique and politics of mathematics education. Rotterdam: Sense.
Stinson, D. W., & Bullock, E. C. (2012). Critical postmodern theory in mathematics education research: A praxis of uncertainty. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 41–55.
Valero, P. (2004). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 5–24). Boston: Kluwer.
Valero, P. (2015). Re-interpreting students’ interest in mathematics: Youth culture and subjectivity. In U. Gellert, J. Giménez-Rodriguz, C. Hahn, & S. Kafoussi (Eds.), Educational paths to mathematics (pp. 15–32). Heidelberg: Springer.
Valero, P., & Stentoft, D. (2010). The “post” move of critical mathematics education. In H. Alrø, O. Ravn, & P. Valero (Eds.), Critical mathematics education: Past, present, and future. Festschrift for Ole Skovsmose (pp. 183–196). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Valero, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (Eds.). (2004). Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. Boston: Kluwer.
Walshaw, M. (Ed.). (2004). Mathematics education within the postmodern. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Walt Disney Productions. (1967). The jungle book. Dir. Wolfgang Reitherman.
Žižek, S. (2000). The Ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2009). The parallax view. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Straehler-Pohl, H., Pais, A., Bohlmann, N. (2017). Welcome to the Jungle. An Orientation Guide to the Disorder of Mathematics Education. In: Straehler-Pohl, H., Bohlmann, N., Pais, A. (eds) The Disorder of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34005-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34006-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)