Abstract
One of the most important issues faced in organizations is the objective performance measure of employees who have a crucial role in the success of the production/service processes. Performance appraisal is vital since it helps to clarify whether the company is going in line with the predetermined objectives. Performance appraisal is the evaluation of the general performance level of personnel according to the previously determined targets and/or performance factors. The main purpose of performance appraisal is not only to increase the performance of employees, but also to unite the individual targets with the company’s targets. Performance appraisal requires evaluation and decision making in uncertain environments involving multiple factors. In this paper, a performance appraisal model is constructed to deal with the uncertainty and also to objectively measure the employees’ performances. The criteria used in the model are defined in terms of the fuzzy numbers and linguistic variables. The three main criteria of the performance appraisal model are decision making and leadership, communication and relations, and technical skills. The model is applied in the purchasing department of a company operating in the automotive industry. The developed model has the flexibility to be applied in different departments with a modification in the criteria under the title of “Technical skills”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Doğan, S., Demiral, Ö.: İnsan Kaynaklari Yönetiminde Çalişanlarin Kendilerine Doğru Yolculuk Yöntemi: Yetenek Yönetimi. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 17(3):145–166 (2008)
Stavrou, E.T., Charalambous, C., Spiliotis, S., et al.: Human resource management and performance: a neural network analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181, 453–467 (2007)
Manoharan, T.R., Muralidharan, C., Deshmukh, S.G., et al.: An integrated fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making model for employees’ performance appraisal. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 22, 722–745 (2011)
Kılıç, S.: Performans değerlendirme sisteminin kariyer planlamasıyla ilişkisinin analizi ve bir uygulama. Dissertation, Uludağ University (2011)
Manoharan, T.R., Muralidharan, C., Deshmugh, S.G., et al.: Employees Performance Appraisal Using Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case Study. Res. Pract. Hum. Res. Manage. 17, 92–111 (2009)
Gürbüz, T., Albayrak, Y.E.: An engineering approach to human resources performance evaluation: Hybrid MCDM application with interactions. Appl. Soft Comput. 21, 365–375 (2014)
Saranga, H., Moser, R.: Performance evaluation of purchasing and supply management using value chain DEA approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207, 197–205 (2010)
Easton, L., Murphy, D.J., Pearson, J.N., et al.: Purchasing performance evaluation: with data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Purchasing Supply Manage 8, 123–134 (2002)
Bourguignon, A.: Performance management and management control: evaluated managers’ point of view. Eur. Account. Rev. 13(4), 659–687 (2004). doi:10.1080/0963818042000216875
Cleveland, J.N., Mohammed, S., Skattebo, A.L., Sin, H.P. et al.: Multiple purposes of performance appraisal: a replication and extension. In: Annual Conference for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Orlando, FL, 2003
Gürbüz, T.: Multiple criteria human performance evaluation using choquet integral. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 3(3), 290–300 (2010). doi:10.1080/18756891.2010.9727700
Li, Y., Jiang, D., Li, F., et al.: The application of generating fuzzy ID3 algorithm in performance evaluation. Procedia Eng. 29, 229–234 (2012)
Shaout, A., Al-Shammari, M.: Fuzzy logic modeling for performance appraisal systems a framework for empirical evaluation. Expert Syst. Appl. 14, 323–328 (1998)
Hedge, J.W., Teachout, M.S.: Exploring the concept of acceptability as a criterion for evaluating performance measures. Group Org. Manage. 25, 22–44 (2000)
Lefkowitz, J.: The role of interpersonal affective regard in supervisory performance ratings: a literature review and proposed causal model. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 73, 67–85 (2000)
Levy, P.E., Williams, J.R.: The social context of performance appraisal: a review and framework for the future. J. Manage. 30(6), 881–905 (2004)
Chang, J.R., Cheng, C.H., Chen, L.S., et al.: A fuzzy-based military officer performance appraisal system. Appl. Soft Comput. 7, 936–945 (2007)
De Andrés, R., García-Lapresta, J.L., González-Pachón, J., et al.: Performance appraisal based on distance function methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207, 1599–1607 (2010)
Moon, C., Lee, J., Lim, S., et al.: A performance appraisal and promotion ranking system based on fuzzy logic: An implementation case in military organizations. Appl. Soft Comput. 10, 512–519 (2010)
Spence, J.R., Keeping, L.: Conscious rating distortion in performance appraisal: a review, commentary, and proposed framework for research. Hum. Res. Manage. Rev. 21, 85–95 (2011)
Barone, M.J., DeCarlo, T.E.: Performance trends and salesperson evaluations: the moderating roles of evaluation task, managerial risk propensity, and firm strategic orientation. J. Pers. Selling Sales Manage. 32(2), 207–223 (2012)
Min-peng, X., Xiao-hu, Z., Xin, D. et al.: Modeling of engineering R&D staff performance appraisal model based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. In: International Conference on Complexity Science and Information Engineering. Systems Engineering Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 236–242 (2012)
Sepehrirad, R., Azar, A., Sadeghi, A., et al.: Developing a hybrid mathematical model for 360-degree performance appraisal: a case study. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 62, 844–848 (2012)
Espinilla, M., De Andrés, R., Martínez, F.J., Martínez, L., et al.: A 360-degree performance appraisal model dealing with heterogeneous information and dependent criteria. Inf. Sci. 222, 459–471 (2013)
Samuel, O.W., Omisore, M.O., Atajeromavwo, E.J., et al.: Online fuzzy based decision support system for human resource performance appraisal. Measurement 55, 452–461 (2014)
Boroushaki, S., Malczewski, J.: Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS. Comput. Geosci. 34, 399–410 (2008)
Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N.: Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega 35(4), 417–431 (2007)
Heo, E., Kim, J., Cho, S., et al.: Selecting hydrogen production methods using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with opportunities, costs, and risks. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 17655–17662 (2012)
Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ruan, D., et al.: Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: the case of Turkey. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 87, 171–184 (2004)
Çelik, D.A.: Enabling more objective performance appraisals: A training program model of pinpointing. Soc. Behav. Sci. 150, 794–802 (2014)
Sanyal, M.K., Biswas, S.B.: Employee motivation from performance appraisal implications: test of a theory in the software industry in West Bengal (India). Procedia Econ. Finan. 11, 182–196 (2014)
Jefferson, A.L.: Performance appraisal applied to leadership. Educ. Stud. 36(1), 111–114 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Esen, H., Hatipoğlu, T., Boyacı, A.İ. (2016). A Fuzzy Approach for Performance Appraisal: The Evaluation of a Purchasing Specialist. In: Merelo, J.J., Rosa, A., Cadenas, J.M., Dourado, A., Madani, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Computational Intelligence. IJCCI 2014. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 620. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26393-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26393-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26391-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26393-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)