Abstract
We present a scheme to solve three-dimensional viscoelastic anisotropic wave propagation on structured staggered grids. The scheme uses a fully-staggered grid (FSG) or Lebedev grid (Lebedev, J Sov Comput Math Math Phys 4:449–465, 1964; Rubio et al. Comput Geosci 70:181–189, 2014), which allows for arbitrary anisotropy as well as grid deformation. This is useful when attempting to incorporate a bathymetry or topography in the model. The correct representation of surface waves is achieved by means of using high-order mimetic operators (Castillo and Grone, SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 25:128–142, 2003; Castillo and Miranda, Mimetic discretization methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013), which allow for an accurate, compact and spatially high-order solution at the physical boundary condition. Furthermore, viscoelastic attenuation is represented with a generalized Maxwell body approximation, which requires of auxiliary variables to model the convolutional behavior of the stresses in lossy media. We present the scheme’s accuracy with a series of tests against analytical and numerical solutions. Similarly we show the scheme’s performance in high-performance computing platforms. Due to its accuracy and simple pre- and post-processing, the scheme is attractive for carrying out thousands of simulations in quick succession, as is necessary in many geophysical forward and inverse problems both for the industry and academia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
J. Carcione, Wave Fields in Real Media: Wave Propagation in Anisotropic, Anelastic and Porous Media. Handbook of Geophysical Exploration, Seismic Exploration (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 2002)
J. Castillo, R. Grone, A matrix analysis approach to higher-order approximations for divergence and gradients satisfying a global conservation law. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 25, 128–142 (2003)
J.E. Castillo, G.F. Miranda, Mimetic Discretization Methods (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013)
J. de la Puente, M. Ferrer, M. Hanzich, J.E. Castillo, J.M. Cela, Effects of free-surface topography on moving-seismic-source modeling. Geophysics 79(3), T125–T141 (2014)
H. Emmerich, M. Korn, Incorporation of attenuation into time-domain computations of seismic wave fields. Geophysics 52, 1252–1264 (1987)
A. Fichtner, Full Seismic Waveform Modelling and Inversion (Springer, Heidelberg, 2010)
M. Hanzich, J. Rodriguez, N. Gutierrez, J. de la Puente, J. Cela, Using HPC software frameworks for developing BSIT: a geophysical imaging tool. In: Proceedings of WCCM XI, ECCM V, ECFD VI, vol. III (2014), pp. 2019–2030
S. Hestholm, Three-dimensional finite difference viscoelastic wave modelling including surface topography. Geophys. J. Int. 139(3), 852–878 (1999)
H. Igel, P. Mora, B. Riollet, Anisotropic wave propagation through finite-difference grids. Geophysics 60, 1203–1216 (1995)
D. Komatitsch, R. Martin, An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics 72(5), SM155–SM167 (2007)
J. Kristek, P. Moczo, Seismic-wave propagation in viscoelastic media with material discontinuities: a 3D fourth-order staggered-grid finite-difference modeling. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 2273–2280 (2003)
M. Kristeková, J. Kristek, P. Moczo, S. Day, Misfit criteria for quantitative comparison of seismograms. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96(5), 1836–1850 (2006)
V. Lebedev, Difference analogies of orthogonal decompositions of basic differential operators and some boundary value problems. J. Sov. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 4, 449–465 (1964)
A.R. Levander, Fourth-order finite difference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics 53, 1425–1436 (1988)
V. Lisitsa, D. Vishnevskiy, Lebedev scheme for the numerical simulation of wave propagation in 3D anisotropic elasticity. Geophys. Prospect. 58(4), 619–635 (2010)
R. Madariaga, Dynamics of an expanding circular fault. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65, 163–182 (1976)
P. Moczo, J. Kristek, M. Galis, P. Pazak, M. Balazovjech, The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion. Acta Phys. Slovaca 57(2), 177–406 (2007)
O. Rojas, S. Day, J. Castillo, L.A. Dalguer, Modelling of rupture propagation using high-order mimetic finite differences. Geophys. J. Int. 172(2), 631–650 (2008)
F. Rubio, M. Hanzich, A. Farrés, J. de la Puente, J. María Cela, Finite-difference staggered grids in GPUs for anisotropic elastic wave propagation simulation. Comput. Geosci. 70, 181–189 (2014)
J. Virieux, SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 49, 1933–1942 (1984)
J. Virieux, P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 51, 889–901 (1986)
Acknowledgements
The authors want to thank Repsol for the permission to publish the present research, carried out at the Repsol-BSC Research Center as a part of the Kaleidoscope Project. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 644602.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ferrer, M., de la Puente, J., Farrés, A., Castillo, J.E. (2015). 3D Viscoelastic Anisotropic Seismic Modeling with High-Order Mimetic Finite Differences. In: Kirby, R., Berzins, M., Hesthaven, J. (eds) Spectral and High Order Methods for Partial Differential Equations ICOSAHOM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 106. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19800-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19800-2_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19799-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19800-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)