Abstract
The typical phenomena in geographic space are 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional in nature, yet people often conceptualize some of them as 1-dimensional entities embedded in a 2-dimensional space—rivers have widths and depths, and extent across the surface of the Earth, but for some tasks they are thought of as linear objects; likewise, roads as travel paths have widths as they wind through the landscape, but in some scenarios the extent is ignored and only connectivity between points along the path is considered. A critical property that makes these features special is the orientation that is attached (e.g., through the flow of the water or the traffic directions imposed by an authority). Contemporary spatial models capture such features either 1-dimensionally as networks of lines or directed lines, or 2-dimensionally simply as regions, each abstracting away one key property—in the case of the network the features’ extents and connections to neighboring areas, and in the case of regions their orientations. This paper introduces oriented regions as a model that preserves the key properties from both abstractions. Key properties of this approach are the sequences in which the boundaries of oriented regions interact, and the placement of objects with respect to the topological hull of a set of oriented regions. This model, dubbed hull+i, is based on topological hulls and the i-notation, a systematic method to capture boundary interactions between oriented regions, and provides a means for representing entire spatial scenes with an arbitrary number of objects, separations, and instances where ensembles of objects surround other objects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexandroff, P.: Elementary Concepts of Topology. Dover, Mineola (1961)
Allen, J.: Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals. Communications of the ACM 26(11), 832–843 (1983)
Barkowsky, T., Latecki, L.J., Richter, K.-F.: Schematizing Maps: Simplification of Geographic Shape by Discrete Curve Evolution. In: Habel, C., Brauer, W., Freksa, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition II. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1849, pp. 41–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Clementini, E., Di Felice, P.: Topological Invariants for Lines. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 10(1), 28–45 (1998)
Cohn, A., Bennett, B., Gooday, J., Gotts, N.: Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning with the Region Connection Calculus. Geoinformatica 1(3), 275–316 (1997)
Cohn, A., Renz, J.: Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning. In: van Hermelen, F., Lifschitz, V., Porter, B. (eds.) Handbook of Knowledge Representation, pp. 551–596 (2008)
Egenhofer, M.J.: The Family of Conceptual Neighborhood Graphs for Region-Region Relations. In: Fabrikant, S.I., Reichenbacher, T., van Kreveld, M., Schlieder, C. (eds.) GIScience 2010. LNCS, vol. 6292, pp. 42–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Egenhofer, M.: Deriving the Composition of Binary Topological Relations. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 5(2), 133–149 (1994)
Egenhofer, M.: Definitions of Line-Line Relations for Geographic Databases. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 16(3), 40–45 (1993)
Egenhofer, M., Al-Taha, K.: Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships. In: Frank, A.U., Formentini, U., Campari, I. (eds.) GIS 1992. LNCS, vol. 639, pp. 196–219. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
Egenhofer, M., Frank, A., Jackson, J.: A Topological Data Model for Spatial Databases. In: Buchmann, A.P., Smith, T.R., Wang, Y.-F., Günther, O. (eds.) SSD 1989. LNCS, vol. 409, pp. 271–286. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)
Egenhofer, M., Franzosa, R.: On the Equivalence of Topological Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9(2), 133–152 (1995)
Egenhofer, M., Franzosa, R.: Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5(2), 161–174 (1991)
Egenhofer, M., Herring, J.: Categorizing Binary Topological Relationships Between Regions, Lines, and Points in Geographic Databases, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME (1991)
Egenhofer, M., Mark, D.: Modeling Conceptual Neighborhoods of Topological Line-Region Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9(5), 555–565 (1995)
Egenhofer, M., Sharma, J., Mark, D.: A Critical Comparison of the 4-Intersection and 9-Intersection Models for Spatial Relations: Formal Analysis. In: McMaster, R., Armstrong, M. (eds.) Autocarto-Conferance, Minneapolis, MN, vol. 11, pp. 1–11 (1993)
Galton, A.: Modes of Overlap. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 9(1), 61–79 (1998)
Haklay, M., Weber, P.: OpenStreetMap: User-Generated Street Maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7(4), 12–18 (2008)
Klippel, A.: Wayfinding Choremes. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 301–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Klippel, A., Li, R., Yang, J., Hardisty, F., Xu, S.: The Egenhofer-Cohn Hypothesis or, Topological Relativity? In: Raubal, M., Mark, D., Frank, A. (eds.) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, pp. 195–215. Springer (2013)
Klippel, A., Tappe, H., Kulik, L.: Wayfinding Choremes—A Language for Modeling Conceptual Route Knowledge. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 16(4), 311–329 (2005)
Kurata, Y.: The 9+-Intersection: A Universal Framework for Modeling Topological Relation. In: Cova, T.J., Miller, H.J., Beard, K., Frank, A.U., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) GIScience 2008. LNCS, vol. 5266, pp. 181–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Kurata, Y., Egenhofer, M.: The Arrow Semantic Interpreter. Spatial Cognition and Computing 8(4), 306–332 (2008)
Kurata, Y., Egenhofer, M.: The Head-Body-Tail Intersection for Spatial Relations Between Directed Line Segments. In: Raubal, M., Miller, H.J., Frank, A.U., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) GIScience 2006. LNCS, vol. 4197, pp. 269–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Lewis, J.A., Dube, M.P., Egenhofer, M.J.: The Topology of Spatial Scenes in R2. In: Tenbrink, T., Stell, J., Galton, A., Wood, Z. (eds.) COSIT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8116, pp. 495–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Mark, D., Egenhofer, M.: Modeling Spatial Relations between Lines and Regions: Combining Formal Mathematical Models and Human Subjects Testing. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 21(3), 195–212 (1994)
Moratz, R., Lücke, D., Mossakowski, T.: A Condensed Semantics for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning about Oriented Straight Line Segments. Artifical Intelligence 175(16-17), 2099–2127 (2011)
Moratz, R., Renz, J., Wolter, D.: Qualitative Spatial Reasoning about Line Segments. In: Horn, W. (ed.) Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2000, Berlin, pp. 234–238 (2000)
Morehouse, S.: GIS-Based Map Compilation and Generalization. In: Müller, J.-C., Lagrange, J., Weibel, R. (eds.) GIS and Generalization: Methodology and Practice, pp. 21–30. Taylor&Francis, Bristol (1995)
Nedas, K., Egenhofer, M., Wilmsens, D.: Metric Details of Topological Line-Line Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21(1), 21–48 (2007)
Reis, R., Egenhofer, M., Matos, J.: Topological Relations Using Two Models of Uncertainty for Lines. In: Caetano, M., Painho, M. (eds.) 7th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 5–7 (2006)
Reis, R., Egenhofer, M., Matos, J.: Conceptual Neighborhoods of Topological Relations between Lines. In: Ruas, A., Gold, C. (eds.) Headway in Spatial Data Handling, pp. 557–574. Springer (2008)
Ruas, A., Lagrange, J.: Data and Knowledge Modelling for Generalization. In: Müller, J., Lagrange, J., Weibel, R. (eds.) GIS and Generalization: Methodology and Practice, pp. 73–90. Taylor&Francis, Bristol (1995)
Schneider, M., Behr, T.: Topological Relationships Between Complex Spatial Objects. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 31(1), 39–81 (2006)
Schwering, A.: Evaluation of a semantic similarity measure for natural language spatial relations. In: Winter, S., Duckham, M., Kulik, L., Kuipers, B. (eds.) COSIT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4736, pp. 116–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Timpf, S., Volta, G., Pollock, D., Egenhofer, M.: A Conceptual Model of Wayfinding Using Multiple Levels of Abstraction. In: Frank, A.U., Formentini, U., Campari, I. (eds.) GIS 1992. LNCS, vol. 639, pp. 348–367. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
Vasardani, M., Timpf, S., Winter, S., Tomko, M.: From Descriptions to Depictions: A Conceptual Framework. In: Tenbrink, T., Stell, J., Galton, A., Wood, Z. (eds.) COSIT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8116, pp. 299–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Worboys, M.: The Maptree: A Fine-Grained Formal Representation of Space. In: Xiao, N., Kwan, M.-P., Goodchild, M.F., Shekhar, S. (eds.) GIScience 2012. LNCS, vol. 7478, pp. 298–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lewis, J.A., Egenhofer, M.J. (2014). Oriented Regions for Linearly Conceptualized Features. In: Duckham, M., Pebesma, E., Stewart, K., Frank, A.U. (eds) Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8728. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11593-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11593-1_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11592-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11593-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)