Abstract
This paper presents the first steps towards a new type of pedagogical agent – a Challenger Teachable Agent, CTA. The overall aim of introducing a CTA is to increase engagement and motivation and challenge students into deeper learning and metacognitive reasoning. The paper discusses desired design features of such an agent on the basis of related work and results from a study where 11-year old students interacted with a first version of a CTA in the framework of an educational software for history. The focus is on how students respond when the CTA disagrees and questions their suggestions, and how groups of students, differing in response behavior and in self-efficacy, experience the CTA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brophy, S., Biswas, G., Katzlberger, T., Bransford, J., Schwartz, D.: Teachable Agents: Combining Insights from Learning Theory and Computer Science. In: Lajoie, S.P., Vivet, M. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 21–28. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)
Chase, C., Chin, D., Oppezzo, M., Schwartz, D.: Teachable Agents and the Protégé Effect: Increasing the Effort Towards Learning. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18(4), 334–352 (2009)
Blair, K., Schwartz, D., Biswas, G., Leelawong, K.: Pedagogical Agents for Learning by Teaching: Teachable Agents. Educational Technology: Special issue on Pedagogical Agents 47(1), 56–61 (2007)
Frasson, C., Aïmeur, E.: A Comparison of Three Learning Strategies in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 14(4), 371–383 (1996)
Aïmeur, E., Dufort, H., Leibu, D., Frasson, C.: Some Justifications About the Learning By Disturbing Strategy. In: du Boulay, W., Mizoguchi, R. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 1–14. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1997)
Schwartz, D., Chase, C., Chin, D., Oppezzo, M., Kwong, H.: Interactive Metacognition: Monitoring and Regulating a Teachable Agent. In: Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A.C. (eds.) Handbook of Metacognition in Education, pp. 340–358. Routledge (2009)
Chin, D.B., Dohmen, I.M., Cheng, B.H., Oppezzo, M.A., Chase, C.C., Schwartz, D.L.: Preparing Students for Future Learning with Teachable Agents. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 58(6), 649–669 (2010)
Cassell, J., Thórisson, K.R.: The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope vs. Emotional Feedback in Animated Conversational Agents. Appl. Artif. Intell. 13, 519–538 (1999)
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., Graesser, A.: Confusion can be Beneficial for Learning. Learning and Instruction 29, 153–170 (2014)
Schwartz, D.: The Productive Agency that Drives Collaborative Learning. In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 197–218. Permagon, Amsterdam (1999)
Carlson, R., Keiser, V., Matsuda, N., Koedinger, K.R., Penstein Rosé, C.: Building a Conversational SimStudent. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 563–569. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: A Framework to Analyze Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computers & Education 46(1), 71–95 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Silvervarg, A., Kirkegaard, C., Nirme, J., Haake, M., Gulz, A. (2014). Steps towards a Challenging Teachable Agent. In: Bickmore, T., Marsella, S., Sidner, C. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8637. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09767-1_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09767-1_52
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09766-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09767-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)