Skip to main content

Ethnography as Collective Research Endeavor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Doing Ethnography in Teams

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

Abstract

Collaboration in ethnography can describe vastly different relationships between individual researchers, research team members, the people they study, and those on whom they rely for background information, support and fieldwork data. This chapter traces a number of historical trajectories of collaboration in ethnography through two terms that consistently appear in the literature: collaborative ethnography and team ethnography. It first defines each term through the work of key authors, outlines how collaboration is understood and practiced according to these definitions, and references sample publications associated with each in tabulated form. It then locates the authors’ approach to doing ethnography in teams within this literature, explicating the similarities and differences to these documented understandings. The chapter can be used as a reading guide to the chapters that follow as well as the suggested readings in the appendices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen Collinson, J. (2006). Running-together: Some ethnomethodological considerations. Ethnographic Studies, 8, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, D. E. (2003). Community-based collaborative team ethnography: A community-university-agency partnership. Human Organization, 62(2), 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buford May, R. A., & Pattilo-McCoy, M. (2000). Do you see what I see? Examining a collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 65–87. doi:10.1177/107780040000600105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E., & Lassiter, L. E. (2010). From collaborative ethnography to collaborative pedagogy: Reflections on the other side of Middletown project and community—University research partnerships. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41(4), 370–385. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01098.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerwonka, A., & Malkki, L. H. (2007). Improvising theory: Process and temporality in ethnographic fieldwork. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creese, A., Bhatt, A., Bhojani, N., & Martin, P. (2008). Fieldnotes in team ethnography: Researching complementary schools. Qualitative Research, 8(2), 197–215. doi:10.1177/1468794107087481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuncliffe, A. L., & Karunanayake, G. (2013). Working within hyphen-spaces in ethnographic research: Implications for research identities and practice. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 364–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, K., & Stull, D. (1998). Doing team ethnography: Warnings and advice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstl-Pepin, C. I., & Gunzenhauser, M. G. (2002). Collaborative team ethnography and the paradoxes of interpretation. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(2), 137–154. doi:10.1080/09518390110111884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, M. (2007). Security, media and multicultural citizenship: A collaborative ethnography. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(3), 275–293. doi:10.1177/1367549407080731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T., Hynninen, P., Lahelma, E., Metso, T., Palmu, T., & Tolonen, T. (2006). Collective ethnography, joint experiences and individual pathways. Nordisk Pedagogik, 26, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). What is ethnography? Ethnography: Principles and practice (pp. 2–22). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, S. (2006). Lassiter, collaborative ethnography. Canadian Journal of Sociology Online, September–October(31). Retrieved from http://www.cjsonline.ca/reviews/collabethno.html

  • Lassister, L. E., & Campbell, E. (2010). What will we have ethnography do? Qualitative Inquiry, 16(9), 757–767. doi:10.1177/1077800410374444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, L. E. (1998). Oklahoma. In L. E. Lassiter (Ed.), The power of Kiowa Song. A collaborative ethnography. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, L. E. (2004). Collaborative ethnography. AnthroNotes, 25(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, L. E. (2005). The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, C. (2007). “When we remix…we remake!!!” Reflections on collaborative ethnography, the new digital ethic, and test prep. Journal of Basic Writing, 26(1), 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska Belgrave, L., & Smith, K. J. (2002). Negotiated validity in collaborative ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The qualitative inquiry reader (pp. 233–255). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjukka Collin, K., Ruoranen, M., & Paloniemi, S. (2008). Collective ethnography in surgical environment: experiences and practices in the field. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Goteborg, September 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, D., & Ratcliffe, R. (2012). After method? Ethnography in the knowledge economy. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 147–164. doi:10.1177/1468794111420902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer, B. (2007). Salvaging the Delaware Big House Ceremony: The history and legacy of Frank Speck’s collaboration with the Oklahoma Delaware. Histories of Anthropology Annual, 3, 184–198. doi:10.1353/haa.0.0027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, K. E. (2009). Ethnography of the ephemeral: studying temporary scenes through individual and collective approaches. Social Identities, 15(4), 509–524. doi:10.1080/13504630903043865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliasco, G. C., & Lipp, T. (2011). The islands have memories: Reflections on two collaborative projects in contemporary Oceania. The Contemporary Pacific, 23(2), 371–410. doi:10.1353/cp.2011.0045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (2008). Beyond participant observation: Collaborative ethnography as theoretical innovation. Collaborative Anthropologies, 1, 1–16. doi:10.1353/cla.0.0014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J.-A., Kamler, B., Simpson, A., & Maclean, R. (1996). “Do you see what I see?” Reading a different classroom scene. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(1), 87–108. doi:10.1080/0951839960090108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, J. (2006). Fielding ethnographic teams: strategy, implementation and evaluation. In R. W. Belk (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing (pp. 268–276). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, L. C. J., Borges, M. R. S., & de Carvalho, P. V. R. (2006). Collaborative ethnography: an approach to the elicitation of cognitive requirements of teams. Paper presented at the CSCWD 2009. Proceedings of the 2009 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Santiago, Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiainen, T., & Koivunen, E.-R. (2006). Exploring forms of triangulation to facilitate collaborative research practice: Reflections from a multidisciplinary research group. Journal of Research Practice, 2(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, J. D., & Bresler, L. (1996). Working in the interpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X025005005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitt, E. J., & Kuh, G. D. (1989). Qualitative methods in higher education research: a team approach to multiple site investigation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), Atlanta, Georgia. Conference paper retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED313981

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teena Clerke .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clerke, T., Hopwood, N. (2014). Ethnography as Collective Research Endeavor. In: Doing Ethnography in Teams. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05618-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics