Skip to main content

Methods in Multi-site Trials of Family-based Interventions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Methods in Family Research

Part of the book series: National Symposium on Family Issues ((NSFI,volume 4))

  • 1645 Accesses

Abstract

I concentrate on a subset of the methodological issues raised in the chapters of Part IV of this volume. First, is the multiple testing problem raised by Moore and Wood (Chap. 13). I point to the advantages of replication across experimental sites or across experiments themselves as a useful antidote for multiple testing bias. Second, as detailed by Metzler, Sanders and Rusby (Chap. 12), family-based interventions typically target a number of individuals—e.g., both parent and children—which raises the problem of how to weight impacts across different kinds of family members to arrive at some overall judgment of whether a given intervention was beneficial. Third, interventions conducted in a number of sites can provide powerful means for estimating the magnitude of some of the nonexperimental linkages in hypothesized theories of change using the method of instrumental variables. Finally, I point to an underemphasized problem in the chapters in Part IV—the fact that a given treatment may have very different kinds of effects for different types of families or individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartlett, M. (1937). Some examples of statistical methods in research in agriculture and applied biology. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 4(2), 137–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. M. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 443–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Lansdale L., & Duncan G. (Eds.). (2001). For better and for worse: Welfare reform and the well-being of children and families. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. (1998). The monetary value of saving a high-risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(1), 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, F., Heckman, J. J., & Schennach, S. M. (2010). Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica, 78(3), 883–931. doi:10.3982/ECTA6551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deparle, J. (2005). American dream: Three women, Ten kids, and a nation’s drive to end Welfare. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54(9), 755–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K., Dishion, T., & Lansford, J. (2006). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G., & Vandell, D. (2012). Understanding variation in the impacts of human capital interventions on children and youth. Irvine Network on Individuals in Development. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G., Morris, P., & Rodrigues, C. (2011). Does money really matter? Estimating impacts of family income on young children’s achievement with data from random-assignment experiments. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1263–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Iver, D. M. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich, E. (1990). Cost-benefit analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennetian, L. A., Huston, A. C., Crosby, D. A., Chang, Y. E., Lowe, E. D., & Weisner, T. (2002). Making child care choices: How welfare and work policies influence parents’ decisions. New York: MDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennetian, L., Duncan, G., Knox, V., Vargas, W., Clark-Kauffman, E., & London, A. (2004). How welfare policies affect adolescents’ school outcomes: A synthesis of evidence from experimental studies. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14(4), 339–423. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2004.00080.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gennetian, L., Magnuson K., & Morris, P. (2008). From statistical associations to causation: What developmentalists can learn from instrumental variables techniques coupled with experimental data. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymans, S., & Shapiro, H. (1974). Five thousand American families—Patterns of economic progress. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, G., & Angrist, J. (1994). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, E., Heckman, J., Cameron, J., & Shonkoff, J. (2006). Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America’s future workforce. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 10155–10162. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600888103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2007). Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica, 75, 83–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A., & Whitmore, D. (2001). The effect of attending a mall class in the early grades on college-test taking and middle school test results: Evidence from project STAR. The Economic Journal, 111, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J., & Kling, J. (2007). Is crime contagious? Journal of Law and Economics, 50, 491–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnuson, K. (1999). Appendix K—The barrier indicator index. In J. Bos, A. Huston, R. Granger, G. J. Duncan, T. Brock, & V. McLoyd (Eds.), New hope for people with low incomes: Two-year results of a program to reduce poverty and reform welfare (pp. 346–355). New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P., Huston, A., Duncan, G., Crosby, D., & Bos, J. (2001). How welfare and work policies affect children: A synthesis of research. New York: MDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P., Duncan, G. J., & Clark-Kauffman, E. (2005). Child well-being in an era of Welfare reform: The sensitivity of transitions in development to policy change. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 919–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L. N. (1978). Sturdy childhood predictors of adult antisocial behavior: Replications from longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine, 8, 611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., Brand, J., & Jann, B. (2011). Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with observational data. Working paper, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, D. L., Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., Steinberg, L., & Vandergrift, N. (2010). Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Child Development, 81, 737–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg J. Duncan PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duncan, G. (2014). Methods in Multi-site Trials of Family-based Interventions. In: McHale, S., Amato, P., Booth, A. (eds) Emerging Methods in Family Research. National Symposium on Family Issues, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics