Abstract
I concentrate on a subset of the methodological issues raised in the chapters of Part IV of this volume. First, is the multiple testing problem raised by Moore and Wood (Chap. 13). I point to the advantages of replication across experimental sites or across experiments themselves as a useful antidote for multiple testing bias. Second, as detailed by Metzler, Sanders and Rusby (Chap. 12), family-based interventions typically target a number of individuals—e.g., both parent and children—which raises the problem of how to weight impacts across different kinds of family members to arrive at some overall judgment of whether a given intervention was beneficial. Third, interventions conducted in a number of sites can provide powerful means for estimating the magnitude of some of the nonexperimental linkages in hypothesized theories of change using the method of instrumental variables. Finally, I point to an underemphasized problem in the chapters in Part IV—the fact that a given treatment may have very different kinds of effects for different types of families or individuals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bartlett, M. (1937). Some examples of statistical methods in research in agriculture and applied biology. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 4(2), 137–183.
Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. M. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 443–50.
Chase-Lansdale L., & Duncan G. (Eds.). (2001). For better and for worse: Welfare reform and the well-being of children and families. New York: Russell Sage.
Cohen, M. (1998). The monetary value of saving a high-risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(1), 5–33.
Cunha, F., Heckman, J. J., & Schennach, S. M. (2010). Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica, 78(3), 883–931. doi:10.3982/ECTA6551.
Deparle, J. (2005). American dream: Three women, Ten kids, and a nation’s drive to end Welfare. New York: Penguin Books.
Dishion, T., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54(9), 755–764.
Dodge, K., Dishion, T., & Lansford, J. (2006). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York: Guilford Press.
Duncan, G., & Vandell, D. (2012). Understanding variation in the impacts of human capital interventions on children and youth. Irvine Network on Individuals in Development. Manuscript in preparation.
Duncan, G., Morris, P., & Rodrigues, C. (2011). Does money really matter? Estimating impacts of family income on young children’s achievement with data from random-assignment experiments. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1263–1279.
Eccles, J., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Iver, D. M. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.
Gramlich, E. (1990). Cost-benefit analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gennetian, L. A., Huston, A. C., Crosby, D. A., Chang, Y. E., Lowe, E. D., & Weisner, T. (2002). Making child care choices: How welfare and work policies influence parents’ decisions. New York: MDRC.
Gennetian, L., Duncan, G., Knox, V., Vargas, W., Clark-Kauffman, E., & London, A. (2004). How welfare policies affect adolescents’ school outcomes: A synthesis of evidence from experimental studies. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14(4), 339–423. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2004.00080.x.
Gennetian, L., Magnuson K., & Morris, P. (2008). From statistical associations to causation: What developmentalists can learn from instrumental variables techniques coupled with experimental data. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 381–394.
Hymans, S., & Shapiro, H. (1974). Five thousand American families—Patterns of economic progress. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.
Imbens, G., & Angrist, J. (1994). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467–475.
Knudsen, E., Heckman, J., Cameron, J., & Shonkoff, J. (2006). Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America’s future workforce. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 10155–10162. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600888103.
Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2007). Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica, 75, 83–119.
Krueger, A., & Whitmore, D. (2001). The effect of attending a mall class in the early grades on college-test taking and middle school test results: Evidence from project STAR. The Economic Journal, 111, 1–28.
Ludwig, J., & Kling, J. (2007). Is crime contagious? Journal of Law and Economics, 50, 491–518.
Magnuson, K. (1999). Appendix K—The barrier indicator index. In J. Bos, A. Huston, R. Granger, G. J. Duncan, T. Brock, & V. McLoyd (Eds.), New hope for people with low incomes: Two-year results of a program to reduce poverty and reform welfare (pp. 346–355). New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
Morris, P., Huston, A., Duncan, G., Crosby, D., & Bos, J. (2001). How welfare and work policies affect children: A synthesis of research. New York: MDRC.
Morris, P., Duncan, G. J., & Clark-Kauffman, E. (2005). Child well-being in an era of Welfare reform: The sensitivity of transitions in development to policy change. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 919–932.
Robins, L. N. (1978). Sturdy childhood predictors of adult antisocial behavior: Replications from longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine, 8, 611–622.
Xie, Y., Brand, J., & Jann, B. (2011). Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with observational data. Working paper, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.
Vandell, D. L., Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., Steinberg, L., & Vandergrift, N. (2010). Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Child Development, 81, 737–756.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duncan, G. (2014). Methods in Multi-site Trials of Family-based Interventions. In: McHale, S., Amato, P., Booth, A. (eds) Emerging Methods in Family Research. National Symposium on Family Issues, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01562-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01561-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01562-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)