Skip to main content

The Effects of Teams’ Co-location on Project Performance

  • Conference paper
Complex Systems Concurrent Engineering

Abstract

This paper aims to present an analysis between teams’ co-location and project performance. In order to achieve product development project success many decisions shall be made before the project kick-off. One of these decisions is to whether co-locate or not the project team. But, what are the effects of teams’ co-location on project performance? The paper provides a literature review about teams’ co-location, its advantages and disadvantages, virtual teams and project performance parameters. A table is then proposed to be used as a guide to determine the degree of success of projects. This paper also presents a case study where 3 pairs of similar New Product Development (NPD) projects were analyzed. In each pair of cases, the first NPD occurred using a co-located team and, in the second case, a virtual team (not co-located team) was adopted. The project performance parameters for each case were identified using the proposed table from which we concluded that co-located teams appears to deliver better performance at least in the “internal project efficiency” parameters. Further research involving a larger sample of cases is still necessary to confirm these conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6 References

  1. STANDISH GROUP, The extreme chaos report. Standish Group International, 2001. Available at: <http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/>. Accessed on: 02/15/06.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ANDREASEN, M. M.; HEIN, L. Integrated product development. A reprint of the 1987 edition. Institute for Product Development, IPU, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McGRATH, M. E. Setting the PACE in product development — a guide to product and cycle-time excellence. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ULRICH, K. T.; EPPINGER, S. D. Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SMITH, P. G.; REINERTSEN, D. G. Developing products in half the time: new rules, new tools. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. HERBSLEB, J. D.; MOCKUS, A.; FINHOLT, T. A.; GRINTER, R. E. Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2000, pp. 319–328.

    Google Scholar 

  7. LEHMANN, J. Virtual meetings: not just an option anymore! Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change, 2003, pp. 443–447.

    Google Scholar 

  8. KATZENBACH, J. R.; SMITH, D. K. The wisdom of teams: creating the high performance organization. Harvard Business School Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ALLEN, T. J. Managing the flow of technology. Harvard Business School Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DAVENPORT, T. H.; PRUSAK, L. Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. KAHN, K., McDONOUGH III E., A. N. Empirical study of the relationships among co-location, integration, performance, and satisfaction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 14, pp. 161–178, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McDONOUGH III., E. F., KAHN, K. B., BARCZAK, G. An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and collocated new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 18, pp. 110–120, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. LAKEMOND, N., BERGGREN, C. Co-locating NPD? The need for combining project focus and organizational integration. Technovation, Vol. 26, pp. 807–819, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. PATTI, A. L., GILBERT, J. P., HARTMAN, S. Physical co-location and the success of new product development projects. Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 31–37, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CLARK, K. B.; FUJIMOTO, T. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. SHENHAR, A. J.; WIDEMAN, R. M. Optimizing Project Success by Matching Management Style to Project Type. PMForum, 2000. Available at: <http://www.pmforum.org/library/papers/2000/PM_Style&Scss.pdf>. Accessed on: 02/15/06.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zenun, M.M.N., Loureiro, G., Araujo, C.S. (2007). The Effects of Teams’ Co-location on Project Performance. In: Loureiro, G., Curran, R. (eds) Complex Systems Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-976-7_79

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-976-7_79

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-975-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-976-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics