Skip to main content

Risk and Complications Associated with Egg Donation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation

Abstract

Oocyte donation has been practiced for more than two decades and currently has wide indications. This has led to an increased demand and a continuous growth of oocyte donation cycles worldwide. Although serious short-term complications are expected to occur at a relatively low rate, it is universally recognized that ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval might involve significant inconvenience and discomfort, as well as risk of injury to the donor.

The short-term risk complications have a defined timeline which helps in their correct differential diagnosis. Significant intra-abdominal bleeding is detected during the first 24 h after oocyte retrieval and prompts close observation or surgical exploration. Smaller-scale, self-limiting intraperitoneal bleeding causes persistent lower abdominal pain during the first few days and might be detected with transvaginal ultrasound scanning. Other potential complications such as adnexal torsion or pelvic infections rarely occur during the first week after oocyte retrieval. In contrast, the symptoms of an early-onset ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) usually appear 3–9 days after hCG administration and can persist up to 10–12 days afterward. Despite their young age and potentially high ovarian response, donors appear to have lower probabilities of developing OHSS due to the absence of subsequent pregnancy. Nevertheless, cases involving oocyte donors with severe early-onset OHSS have been reported in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sauer MV, Kavic SM. Oocyte and embryo donation 2006: reviewing two decades of innovation and controversy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12(2):153–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sauer MV. Defining the incidence of serious complications experienced by oocyte donors: a review of 1000 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(3):277–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sahuquillo S, Meseguer M, Martínez A, Fernández V, Jiménez L, Borgoñoz A, Pellicer A, Alamá P. The incidence of minor and serious complications related to controlled ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:O-143 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bodri D, Guillen JJ, Polo A, Trullenque M, Esteve C, Coll O. Complications related to ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in 4052 oocyte donor cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(2):237–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maxwell KN, Cholst IN, Rosenwaks Z. The incidence of both serious and minor complications in young women undergoing oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(6):2165–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wikland M, Blad S, Bungum L, Hillensjo T, Karlstrom PO, Nilsson S. A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1377–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ludwig AK, Glawatz M, Griesinger G, Diedrich K, Ludwig M. Perioperative and post-operative complications of transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval: prospective study of >1000 oocyte retrievals. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(12):3235–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller PB, Price T, Nichols Jr JE, Hill L. Acute ureteral obstruction following transvaginal oocyte retrieval for IVF. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(1):137–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fiori O, Cornet D, Darai E, Antoine JM, Bazot M. Uro-retroperitoneum after ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicle puncture in an oocyte donor: a case report. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(11):2969–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grynberg M, Berwanger AL, Toledano M, Frydman R, Deffieux X, Fanchin R. Ureteral injury after transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval: a complication of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer that may lurk undetected in women presenting with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(4):869–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dessole S, Rubattu G, Ambrosini G, Miele M, Nardelli GB, Cherchi PL. Blood loss following noncomplicated transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(1):205–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Shawarby SA, Margara RA, Trew GH, Laffan MA, Lavery SA. Thrombocythemia and hemoperitoneum after transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):735–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Battaglia C, Regnani G, Giulini S, Madgar L, Genazzani AD, Volpe A. Severe intraabdominal bleeding after transvaginal oocyte retrieval for IVF-ET and coagulation factor XI deficiency: a case report. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18(3):178–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moayeri SE, Coutre SE, Ramirez EJ, Westphal LM. Von Willebrand disease presenting as recurrent hemorrhage after transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(4):e10–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moini A, Riazi K, Amid V, et al. Endometriosis may contribute to oocyte retrieval-induced pelvic inflammatory disease: report of eight cases. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2005;22(7–8):307–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Toukhy T, Hanna L. Pelvic infection after oocyte retrieval: a preventable complication or an inevitable risk? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26(7):701–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stoop D, Vercammen L, Polyzos NP, de Vos M, Nekkebroeck J, Devroey P. Effect of ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval on reproductive outcome in oocyte donors. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(6):1328–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Azem F, Wolf Y, Botchan A, Amit A, Lessing JB, Kluger Y. Massive retroperitoneal bleeding: a complication of transvaginal ultrasonography-guided oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(2):405–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. El-Shawarby S, Margara R, Trew G, Lavery S. A review of complications following transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2004;7(2):127–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jayaprakasan K, Herbert M, Moody E, Stewart JA, Murdoch AP. Estimating the risks of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): implications for egg donation for research. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2007;10(3):183–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. Rare occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in oocyte donors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996;52(3):259–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Melo M, Bellver J, Garrido N, Meseguer M, Pellicer A, Remohi J. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing three different gonadotropin regimens in oocyte donors: ovarian response, in vitro fertilization outcome, and analysis of cost minimization. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(3):958–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Humaidan P, Quartarolo J, Papanikolaou EG. Preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: guidance for the clinician. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):389–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aboulghar M. Symposium: update on prediction and management of OHSS. Prevention of OHSS. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(1):33–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Melo MA, Garrido N, Alvarez C, et al. Antral follicle count (AFC) can be used in the prediction of ovarian response but cannot predict the oocyte/embryo quality or the in vitro fertilization outcome in an egg donation program. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(1):148–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee TH, Liu CH, Huang CC, et al. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol levels as predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction technology cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(1):160–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakhuda GS, Douglas NC, Thornton MH, Guarnaccia MM, Lobo R, Sauer MV. Anti-Mullerian hormone testing is useful for individualization of stimulation protocols in oocyte donors. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(1):42–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Riggs R, Kimble T, Oehninger S, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone serum levels predict response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation but not embryo quality or pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):410–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Delvigne A, Rozenberg S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(6):559–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Papanikolaou EG, Pozzobon C, Kolibianakis EM, et al. Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(1):112–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Martinez F, Boada M, Coroleu B, et al. A prospective trial comparing oocyte donor ovarian response and recipient pregnancy rates between suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) alone and dual suppression with a contraceptive vaginal ring and GnRH. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(8):2121–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bodri D, Vernaeve V, Guillen JJ, Vidal R, Figueras F, Coll O. Comparison between a GnRH antagonist and a GnRH agonist flare-up protocol in oocyte donors: a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(9):2246–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wei AY, Mijal KA, Christianson MS, Schouweiler CM, Lindheim SR. Comparison of GnRH antagonists and flareup GnRH agonists in donor oocyte cycles. J Reprod Med. 2008;53(3):147–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bodri D, Guillén JJ, Rodríguez A, Trullenque M, Coll O, Vernaeve V. Gonadotropin-only stimulation with clomiphene citrate co-treatment: exploring a GnRH analogue-free stimulation protocol in oocyte donors. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:P-553 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bodri D, Sunkara SK, Coomarasamy A. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists versus antagonists for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in oocyte donors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):164–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Holzer H, Scharf E, Chian RC, Demirtas E, Buckett W, Tan SL. In vitro maturation of oocytes collected from unstimulated ovaries for oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(1):62–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kadoch IJ, Jamal W, Phillips SJ, et al. Successful pregnancy in an ovarian agenesis patient after modified natural cycle IVF oocyte donation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(2):221–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Quea G, Pellicer A. Coasting for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: much ado about nothing? Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):547–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Isaza V, Garcia-Velasco JA, Aragones M, Remohi J, Simon C, Pellicer A. Oocyte and embryo quality after coasting: the experience from oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1777–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hernandez ER, Gomez-Palomares JL, Ricciarelli E. No room for cancellation, coasting, or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in oocyte donation cycles. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4 Suppl):1358–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bodri D, Guillen JJ, Trullenque M, Schwenn K, Esteve C, Coll O. Early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is completely prevented by gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist triggering in high-risk oocyte donor cycles: a prospective, luteal-phase follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2418–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Amin YM, Al-Inany HG, Aboulghar MM, Serour GI. A prospective randomized study comparing coasting with GnRH antagonist administration in patients at risk for severe OHSS. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15(3):271–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tsoumpou I, Muglu J, Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG. Symposium: update on prediction and management of OHSS. Optimal dose of HCG for final oocyte maturation in IVF cycles: absence of evidence? Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(1):52–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bodri D, Guillen JJ, Galindo A, Mataro D, Pujol A, Coll O. Triggering with human chorionic gonadotropin or a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist-treated oocyte donor cycles: findings of a large retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(2):365–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Erb TM, Vitek W, Wakim AN. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or human chorionic gonadotropin for final oocyte maturation in an oocyte donor program. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):374–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Ross R. Comparison of human chorionic gonadotropin and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for final oocyte maturation in oocyte donor cycles. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(1):237–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Melo M, Busso CE, Bellver J, et al. GnRH agonist versus recombinant HCG in an oocyte donation programme: a randomized, prospective, controlled, assessor-blind study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(4):486–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Galindo A, Bodri D, Guillen JJ, Colodron M, Vernaeve V, Coll O. Triggering with HCG or GnRH agonist in GnRH antagonist treated oocyte donation cycles: a randomised clinical trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25(1):60–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Acevedo B, Gomez-Palomares JL, Ricciarelli E, Hernandez ER. Triggering ovulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists does not compromise embryo implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(6):1682–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sismanoglu A, Tekin HI, Erden HF, Ciray NH, Ulug U, Bahceci M. Ovulation triggering with GnRH agonist vs. hCG in the same egg donor population undergoing donor oocyte cycles with GnRH antagonist: a prospective randomized cross-over trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26(5):251–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Youssef MA, Al-Inany HG, Evers JL, Aboulghar M. Intra-venous fluids for the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(2):CD001302.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Giles J, Requena A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Pacheco A, Pellicer J, Pellicer A. GnRH analogue for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4 Suppl):1366–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas GT, Kolibianakis EM. Management of severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by re-initiation of GnRH antagonist. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15(4):408–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Youssef MA, van Wely M, Hassan MA, et al. Can dopamine agonists reduce the incidence and severity of OHSS in IVF/ICSI treatment cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(5):459–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Alvarez C, Marti-Bonmati L, Novella-Maestre E, et al. Dopamine agonist cabergoline reduces hemoconcentration and ascites in hyperstimulated women undergoing assisted reproduction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(8):2931–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Garcia-Velasco JA, Quea G, Piro M, et al. Letrozole administration during the luteal phase after ovarian stimulation impacts corpus luteum function: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):222–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B, Donoso P, Papanikolaou E, Smitz J, Devroey P. Luteal phase oestradiol suppression by letrozole: a pilot study in oocyte donors. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(3):307–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Engmann L, DiLuigi A, Schmidt D, Nulsen J, Maier D, Benadiva C. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):84–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cerrillo M, Rodriguez S, Mayoral M, Pacheco A, Martinez-Salazar J, Garcia-Velasco JA. Differential regulation of VEGF after final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist versus hCG: a rationale for OHSS reduction. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4 Suppl):1526–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Whelan 3rd JG, Vlahos NF. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):883–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Griesinger G, Schultz L, Bauer T, Broessner A, Frambach T, Kissler S. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in combination with a “freeze-all” strategy: a prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):2029–33, 2033.e1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kol S. A case of severe early-onset OHSS after GnRH-agonist triggering. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(3):e151; author reply e152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Brinton L. Long-term effects of ovulation-stimulating drugs on cancer risk. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15(1):38–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Schneider J. Fatal colon cancer in a young egg donor: a physician mother’s call for follow-up and research on the long-term risks of ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):2016.e1–15.e5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Caligara C, Navarro J, Vargas G, Simon C, Pellicer A, Remohi J. The effect of repeated controlled ovarian stimulation in donors. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2320–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive M. Repetitive oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5 Suppl):S194–5.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Merlet F, Senemaud B. Egg donation: regulation of the donation and the hidden face of the cross-border ­reproductive care. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010;38(1):36–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Bodri M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bodri, D. (2013). Risk and Complications Associated with Egg Donation. In: Sauer, M. (eds) Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2392-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2392-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2391-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2392-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics