Skip to main content

Using the Kelly Criterion for Investing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stochastic Optimization Methods in Finance and Energy

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 163))

  • 2690 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the use of the Kelly capital growth model. This model, dubbed Fortune’s Formula by Thorp and used in the title by Poundstone (Fortune’s Formula: The Untold Story of the Scientific System That Beat the Casinos and Wall Street, 2005), has many attractive features such as the maximization of asymptotic long-run wealth; see Kelly (Bell System Technical Journal 35:917–926, 1956), Breiman (Proceedings of the 4th Berkely Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1:63–68, 1961), Algoet and Cover (Annals of Probability 16(2):876–898, 1988) and Thorp (Handbook of Asset and Liability Management, 2006). Moreover, it minimizes the expected time to reach asymptotically large goals (Breiman, Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1:63–68, 1961) and the strategy is myopic (Hakansson, Journal of Business 44:324–334, 1971). While the strategy to maximize the expected logarithm of expected final wealth computed via a nonlinear program has a number of good short- and medium-term qualities (see MacLean, Thorp, and Ziemba, The Kelly Capital Growth Investment Critria, 2010b), it is actually very risky short term since its Arrow–Pratt risk aversion index is the reciprocal of wealth and that is essentially zero for non-bankrupt investors. The chapter traces the development and use of this strategy from the log utility formulation in 1738 by Bernoulli (Econometrica 22:23–36, 1954) to current use in financial markets, sports betting, and other applications. Fractional Kelly wagers that blend the E log maximizing strategy with cash tempers the risk and yield smoother wealth paths but with generally less final wealth. Great sensitivity to parameter estimates, especially the means, makes the strategy dangerous to those whose estimates are in error and leads them to poor betting and possible bankruptcy. Still, many investors with repeated investment periods and considerable wealth, such as Warren Buffett and George Soros, use strategies that approximate full Kelly which tends to place most of one’s wealth in a few assets and lead to many monthly losses but large final wealth most of the time. A simulation study is presented that shows the possibility of huge gains most of the time, possible losses no matter how good the investments appear to be, and possible extreme losses from overbetting when bad scenarios occur. The study and discussion shows that Samuelson’s objections to E log strategies are well understood. In practice, careful risk control or financial engineering is important to deal with short-term volatility and the design of good wealth paths with limited drawdowns. Properly implemented, the strategy used by many billionaires has much to commend it, especially with many repeated investments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This example was modified from one in MacLean, Thorp, Zhao, and Ziemba (2011).

  2. 2.

    The formula relating λ and f for this example is as follows. For the problem

    $$\mathrm{Max}_{x}\left\{ E(\ln(1+r+x(R-r)\right\} ,$$

    where R is assumed to be Gaussian with mean μ R and standard deviation σ R , and r = the risk-free rate. The solution is given by Merton (1990) as

    $$x=\frac{\mu_{R}-r}{\sigma_{R}}.$$

    Since \(\mu_{R}=0.102,\sigma_{R}=0.203,r=0.039\), the Kelly strategy is \(x=1.5288\).

References

  • Aase, K. K. (2001). On the St. Petersburg Paradox. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 3 (1), 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. M. and T. M. Cover (1980). Competitive optimality of logarithmic investment. Math of Operations Research 5, 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertocchi, M., S. L. Schwartz, and W. T. Ziemba (2010). Optimizing the Aging, Retirement, Pensions Dilemma. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicksler, J. L. and E. O. Thorp (1973). The capital growth model: an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 8 (2), 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (1960). Investment policies for expanding businesses optimal in a long run sense. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 4 (4), 647–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (1961). Optimal gambling system for favorable games. Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1, 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, V. K. and W. T. Ziemba (1993). The effect of errors in mean, variance and co-variance estimates on optimal portfolio choice. Journal of Portfolio Management 19, 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cover, T. M. and J. Thomas (2006). Elements of Information Theory (2nd ed.). Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. (2006). Optimize your portfolio with the Kelly formula. morningstar.com, October 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, N. H. and W. T. Ziemba (1995). Capital growth theory. In R. A. Jarrow, V. Maksimovic, and W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Finance, Handbooks in OR & MS, pp. 65–86. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harville, D. A. (1973). Assigning probabilities to the outcome of multi-entry competitions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 68, 312–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausch, D. B., V. Lo, and W. T. Ziemba (Eds.) (1994). Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets. Academic, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausch, D. B., V. Lo, and W. T. Ziemba (Eds.) (2008). Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets (2 ed.). World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausch, D. B. and W. T. Ziemba (1985). Transactions costs, extent of inefficiencies, entries and multiple wagers in a racetrack betting model. Management Science 31, 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausch, D. B., W. T. Ziemba, and M. E. Rubinstein (1981). Efficiency of the market for racetrack betting. Management Science XXVII, 1435–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Jr., J. R. (1956). A new interpretation of the information rate. Bell System Technical Journal 35, 917–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, H. (1978). The geometric-mean principle revisited – a reply. Journal of Banking and Finance 2 (4), 395–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. (2006). How to calculate the Kelly formula. fool.com, October 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger, D. G. (1993). A preference foundation for log mean-variance criteria in portfolio choice problems. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 17, 887–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L. C., R. Sanegre, Y. Zhao, and W. T. Ziemba (2004). Capital growth with security. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28 (4), 937–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L. C., E. O. Thorp, Y. Zhao, and W. T. Ziemba (2011). How does the Fortunes Formula-Kelly capital growth model perform? Journal of Portfolio Management 37 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L. C., E. O. Thorp, and W. T. Ziemba (2010a). The good and properties of the Kelly and fractional Kelly capital growth criterion. Quantitative Finance (August–September), 681–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L. C., E. O. Thorp, and W. T. Ziemba (2010b). The Kelly Capital Growth Investment Criteria. World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L. C., Y. Zhao, and W. T. Ziemba (2009). Optimal capital growth with convex loss penalties. Working paper, Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L. C., W. T. Ziemba, and G. Blazenko (1992). Growth versus security in dynamic investment analysis. Management Science 38, 1562–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L. C., W. T. Ziemba, and Li (2005). Time to wealth goals in capital accumulation and the optimal trade-off of growth versus security. Quantitative Finance 5 (4), 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menger, K. (1967). The role of uncertainty in economics. In M. Shubik (Ed.), Essays in Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1990). Continuous Time Finance. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. and P. A. Samuelson (1974). Fallacy of the log-normal approximation to optimal portfolio decision-making over many periods. Journal of Financial Economics 1, 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pabrai, M. (2007). The Dhandho Investor. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poundstone, W. (2005). Fortune’s Formula: The Untold Story of the Scientific System That Beat the Casinos and Wall Street. Hill and Wang, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1969). Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming. Review of Economics and Statistics 51, 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1971). The fallacy of maximizing the geometric mean in long sequences of investing or gambling. Proceedings National Academy of Science 68, 2493–2496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1977). St. Petersburg paradoxes: Defanged, dissected and historically described. Journal of Economic Literature 15 (1), 24–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1979). Why we should not make mean log of wealth big though years to act are long. Journal of Banking and Finance 3, 305–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (2006–2009). Letters to William T. Ziemba, correspondence December 13, 2006, May 7, 2008, and May 12, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. (2002). Stocks for the Long Run. Wiley, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, E. O. (2008). Understanding the Kelly criterion. Wilmott, May and September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemba, W. T. (2005). The symmetric downside risk Sharpe ratio and the evaluation of great investors and speculators. Journal of Portfolio Management Fall, 32 (1), 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziemba, W. T. (2010). A tale of five investors: response to Paul A. Samuelson letters. Working Paper, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemba, W. T. and D. B. Hausch (1986). Betting at the Racetrack. Dr Z Investments, San Luis Obispo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemba, W. T. and D. B. Hausch (1987). Dr Z’s Beat the Racetrack. William Morrow, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemba, R. E. S. and W. T. Ziemba (2007). Scenarios for Risk Management and Global Investment Strategies. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William T. Ziemba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ziemba, W.T., MacLean, L.C. (2011). Using the Kelly Criterion for Investing. In: Bertocchi, M., Consigli, G., Dempster, M. (eds) Stochastic Optimization Methods in Finance and Energy. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 163. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9586-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics