Abstract
Highly gifted children and adolescents are students at risk because they differ so significantly from their age-peers in many aspects of their cognitive and affective development. The cognitive strategies they employ are not readily understood by classmates or, often, by teachers. In the elementary school years, their strong intrinsic motivational orientation is at variance with the “reward” philosophy of many classrooms. Their conceptions and expectations of friendship differ strongly from those of age-peers and more closely resemble those of older students. Their moral reasoning tends to be more akin to that of students some years older. Longitudinal studies which have traced these young people’s development through adolescence and adulthood have identified strongly positive academic and social outcomes of various forms of academic acceleration, including, for exceptionally and profoundly gifted students, thoughtfully monitored programs of radical acceleration which allow graduation from high school three or more years earlier than usual.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474–480.
Bigelow, B. J., & LaGaipa, J. J. (1975). Children’s written descriptions of friendship: A multidimensional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 11, 857–858.
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
Cronbach, L. J. (1996). Acceleration among the Terman males: Correlates in midlife and after. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.) Intellectual talent (pp. 179–191). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dauber, S. L., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremely talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(1) 10–14.
DeHaan, R. F., & Havighurst, R. J. (1961). Educating gifted children. (Revised edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks.Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 7–31.
Dunn, R., Dunn. K., & Price, G. E. (1981). Learning styles: Research vs. opinion. Phi Delta Kappan, 62, 645–646.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1985). Excellence in educating the gifted. Denver: Love.
Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds). Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.), (pp. 60–74). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Gallagher, J. J. (1958). Peer acceptance of highly gifted children in the elementary school. Elementary School Journal, 58, 465–470.
Gallagher, J. J., & Crowder, Y. (1957). The adjustment of gifted children in the classroom. Exceptional children. 23, 306–319.
Goldstein, D., Stocking, V. B., & Godfrey, J. J. (1999). What we’ve learned from talent search research. In N. Colangelo & S. G. Assouline (Eds.) Talent Development III: Proceedings from the 1995 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
Gottfried, .W., Gottfried, A. E., Bathurst, K., & Guerin, D. W. (1994). Gifted IQ: early developmental aspects: The Fullerton longitudinal study. New York and London: Plenum Press.
Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., & Guerin, D. W. (2006). The Fullerton longitudinal study: A long-term investigation of intellectual and motivational giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(4), 430–450.
Gross, M. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11(4), 189–194.
Gross, M. U. M. (1992). The early development of three profoundly gifted children of IQ 200. In P. N. Klein & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.) To be young and gifted (pp. 94–140). New Jersey: Ablex.
Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally Gifted Children. London: Routledge.
Gross, M. U. M. (1997). How ability grouping turns big fish into little fish – or does it? Of optical illusions and optimal environments. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 6(2), 18–30.
Gross, M. U. M. (1998). The “Me” Behind the mask: Intellectually gifted children and the search for identity. Roeper Review, 20(3), 167–174.
Gross, M. U. M. (2000). From “play partner” to sure shelter“: A comparison of conceptions of friendship between children of average ability, moderately gifted and highly gifted children. Unpublished keynote address: Fifth Wallace International Research Symposium on Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa, May 19.
Gross, M. U. M. (2002). Gifted children and the gift of friendship. Understanding Our Gifted, 14(3), 27–29.
Gross, M. U. M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Gross, M. U. M. (2006). Exceptionally gifted children: Long-term outcomes of academic acceleration and non-acceleration. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(4), 404–429.
Holahan, C. K., & Sears, R. R. (1995). The gifted group at later maturity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1926) Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1936). The development of personality in highly intelligent children. National Elementary Principal, 15, 272–281.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1942) Children above IQ 180: Their origin and development. New York: World Books.
Janos, P. M. (1983). The psychological vulnerabilities of children of very superior intellectual ability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New York University.
Janos, P. M. and Robinson, N. M. (1985). ‘Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children’, in F. D. Horowitz and M. O’Brian (Eds.) The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives. pp. 149–195. Washington, DC: American Psychogical Association.
Janos, P.M., Marwood, K. A., & Robinson, N. N. (1985). Friendship patterns in highly intelligent children. Roeper Review, 8(1), 46–49.
Kanevsky, L. K. (1994). A comparative study of children’s learning in the zone of proximal development. European Journal of High Ability, 5(2), 163–175.
Laycock, F. (1979). Gifted children. Glenview. Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Co.
Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: a 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718–729.
Mulryan, C. M. (1992). Student passivity during cooperative small groups in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 261–273.
Muznieks, C. (2000). Psychosocial and academic outcomes for selective high school students undertaking a program of cohort acceleration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
O’Leary, K. (2004) The development of personal strengths and moral reasoning in gifted adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ricca, J. (1984). Learning styles and preferred instructional strategies of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 121–126.
Ristow, R. S., & Edeburn, C. E. (1985). Learning preferences: A comparison of gifted and above-average middle grades students in small schools. Roeper Review, 8, 119–124.
Robinson, A. (1990). Point-counterpoint: Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9–27.
Rogers, K. B. (1986). Do the gifted think and learn differently? A review of recent research and its implications for instruction. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10(1), 17–39.
Rogers, K. B. (2006). The impact of leadership training on the self-efficacy and self-directedness of gifted adolescents. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 15(2), 16–26.
Selig, K. (1959). Personality structure as revealed by the Rorschach technique of a group of children who test above 170 IQ on the 1937 edition of the Stanford-Binet. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
Selman, R. L. (1981). The child as a friendship philosopher. In S. R. Asher & J. M. Gottman (Eds.) The development of children’s friendships (pp. 242–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheldon, P. M. (1959). Isolation as a characteristic of highly gifted children. The Journal of Educational Sociology, January, 215–221.
Silverman, L. K. (1989). The highly gifted. In J. F. Feldhusen, J. VanTassel-Baska, & K. Seeley (Eds.), Excellence in educating the gifted (pp. 71–83). Denver: Love.
Silverman, L. K. (1993). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver: Love.
Sternberg, R. (1981). A componential theory of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 86–93.
Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius (Vol. 1). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M. (1954). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist, 9, 221–230.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H.(1947). Genetic studies of genius: Volume IV: The gifted child grows up. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius (Vol. 5), The gifted group at mid-life Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Thorndike, R. (1940). Performance of gifted children on tests of developmental age. Journal of Psychology, 9, 337–343.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gross, M.U. (2009). Highly Gifted Young People: Development from Childhood to Adulthood. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6161-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6162-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)