Skip to main content

Status of Agricultural Biotechnology: An International Perspective

  • Chapter
Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 30))

Abstract

This paper provides a review of health and environmental effects of GM crops (foods), intellectual property right developments, and regulatory developments for GM crops (foods). Estimates of realized and potential cost reductions are also reported. These estimates show that European Union countries (original EU member countries) have not taken advantage of cost reductions for GM crops to date. More importantly, estimates of potential cost reductions indicate that European Union countries have very low potential cost reduction gains. (Even with 80 percent GM crop adoption cost reductions, gains are around one percent.) However, because EU countries are net importers of many agricultural commodities, EU countries have a major impact on developing countries. Many developing countries in Africa have failed to adopt GM crops because of EU countries’ advice regarding the “precautionary principle.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Carpenter, J.E., and L.P. Gianessi. 2001. Agricultural Biotechnology: Updated Benefits Estimates. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G. 2000. Crop Biotechnology: Benefits, Risks and Ownership. Speech by the President of the Rockefeller Foundation delivered at the OECD Edinburgh Conference on the Scientific and Health Aspects of Genetically Modified Foods. Available online under “news archive” at http://www.rockfound.org (accessed March 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, K., M. Morris, M. Khairallah, J.M. Ribaut, S. Pandey, and G. Srinivasan. 2000. Is Marker-Assisted Selection Cost-Effective Compared to Conventional Plant Breeding Methods? The Case of Quality Protein Maize. Paper presented at the 4th 1CABR Conference on Economics of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ravello, Italy, August 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. 2001. Who Benefits from Biotechnology? Paper presented at the American Seed Trade Association meeting, Chicago, IL, December 5–7. Available online at http:// www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubinfo/papersspeeches/biotech.html (accessed March 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R.E., and D. Gollin. 1997. “Genetic Resources, International Organizations, and Rice Varietal Improvement.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 45(3): 471–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falck-Zepeda, J.B., G. Traxler, and R.G. Nelson. 1999. Rent Creation and Distribution from the First Three Years of Planting Bt Cotton. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications) Briefs No. 14, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Cornejo, J., and W.D. McBride. 2000. Genetically Engineered Crops for Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture: Farm Level Effects. Agricultural Economic Report No. 786, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, L.P., C.S. Silvers, S. Sankula, and J.E. Carpenter. 2002. Plant Biotechnology: Current and Potential Impact for Improving Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture: An Analysis of 40 Case Studies. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. 2002. Preview: Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2002. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications) Briefs No. 27, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C.E., and J. Huang. 2003. “The Impact of Bt Cotton in China.” In N. Kalaitzandonakes, ed., The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. New York: Kluwer-Plenum Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M., and A. de Janvry. 2003. “Genetically Modified Crops, Corporate Pricing Strategies, and Farmers’ Adoption: The Case of Bt Cotton in Argentina.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(4): 814–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M., and G. Traxler. 2005. “Roundup Ready Soybeans in Argentina: Farm Level, Environmental, and Welfare Effect.” Agricultural Economics 32(1): 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M., and D. Zilberman. 2003. “Yield Effects of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries.” Science 299(5608): 900–902.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C.F., and B. Ryan. “The Global Diffusion of Plant Biotechnology: International Adoption and Research in 2004.” Report prepared for the Council on Biotechnology Information, Washington, D.C. (December 8, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, G., S. Godoy-Avila, J. Falck-Zepeda, and J. Espinoza-Arellano. 2003. “Transgenic Cotton in Mexico: Economic and Environmental Impacts.” In N. Kalaitzandonakes, ed., The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. New York: Kluwer-Plenum Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evenson, R.E. (2006). Status of Agricultural Biotechnology: An International Perspective. In: Just, R.E., Alston, J.M., Zilberman, D. (eds) Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 30. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36953-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics