Skip to main content
  • 1155 Accesses

Abstract

In the biological sciences lew generalizations are absolute and we have already noted strange bases in RNA in addition to the usual — A, C, G and U (Fig. 5–1). For many purposes DNA can be considered solely in terms of its four major bases — A, C, G and T. However, in written languages single letters arc sometimes qualified with accents. We should not be surprised to find that there are similar qualifications in the DNA language. The most evident of these is methy Icytosine, where the base C acquires a chemical grouping (mcthyl) [2]. Thus, in many organisms DNA has five letters — A, C, Me-C, G and T. Apart from the pattern of the four regular bases, there is a pattern of methylation at intervals along a DNA sequence. A brief consideration of the fifth letter is needed to conclude our discussion of evolutionary bioinformatics.

“We have had some absurd attempts ... to apply mathematics to biology, but ... my hope is still that I may live to see mathematics applied to biology properly. The most promising place for beginning, I believe, is the mechanism ofpattern.” W. Bateson to G. H. Hardy (1924) [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bateson W (1924) Letter to G. H. Hardy. Bateson Archive, Cambridge University

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson TB, Coghill RD (1925) The discovery of 5-methyl-cytosinc in tuberculinic acid, the nucleic acid of the tubercle bacillus. Journal of the American Chemical Society 47: 2838–2844

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bird A (2002) DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes and Development 16:621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Galagan JE, Selker EU (2004) RIP: the evolutionary cost of genome defence. Trends in Genetics 20:417–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takai D, Jones PA (2002) Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 3740 3745

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krieg AM (2002) CpG motifs in bacterial DNA and their immune effects. Annual Reviews of Immunology 20:709–760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fraga MF, et al. (2005) Epigenetic differences arise during the life time of monozygotic twins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102: 10604–10609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Surani MA (2001) Reprogramming of genome function through epigenetic inheritance. Nature 414: 122–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmgren C, Kanduri C, Dell G, Ward A, Mukhopadhya R, Kanduri M, Lobanenkov Y, Ohlsson R (2001) CpG methylation regulates the 1gf2/H19 insulator. Current Biology 11: 1128–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bateson W, Pellew C (1915) On the genetics of “rogues” among culinary peas (Pisum sativum). Journal of Genetics 5:15–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stam M, Mittelsten Scheid O (2005) Paramutation: an encounter leaving a lasting impression. Trends in Plant Science 10:283–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pembrey ME, Bygren LO, Kaati, G, Edvinsson S, Northstone K, Sjostrom M, Golding J (2006) Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. European Journal of Human Genetics 14:159–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forsdyke, D.R. (2006). The Fifth Letter. In: Evolutionary Bioinformatics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33419-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics