Abstract
A standard control problem is analyzed using quantum probabilities. There are some advantages of conducting the analysis using the axiomatic structure of quantum probabilities: (1) there is synergy associated with bundling activities together, and, hence, a demand for the firm; (2) information occupies a central place in the analysis; (3) accounting information questions can be related to other information sciences. The main result is that control costs decline when aggregate performance measures are used; aggregation arises naturally. An implication is that the common practice of acquiring individual measures may be misguided in an environment where synergy is a first order effect. Also, double entry accounting appears well suited for processing information in a synergistic context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aczel, A. 2001. Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics. New York, NY: Four Walls Eight Windows.
Amershi, A., J. Demski and J. Fellingham. 1985. “Sequential Bayesian Analysis in Accounting Settings,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Spring.
Antle, R. and J. Demski. 1989. “Revenue Recognition,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Spring.
Arya, A., J. Glover, and S. Sunder. 1998. “Earnings Management and the Revelation Principle,” Review of Accounting Studies 3, No. 1 and 2.
Arya, A. 2002. “Synergy Among Seemingly Independent Activities,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Fall.
Bell, J. 1964. “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox,” Physics, Volume 1.
Bouwmeester, D. and A. Zeilinger. 2000. “The Physics of Quantum Information: Basic Concepts,” in The Physics of Quantum Information, Dirk Bouwmeester, Artur Ekert, and Anton Zeilinger, (eds.). Berlin: Springer.
Christensen, J. and J. Demski. 2003. Accounting Theory: An Information Content Perspective. New York, NY: McGraw Hill-Irwin.
Datar, S., and M. Gupta. 1994. “Aggregation, Specification and Measurement Errors in Product Costing,” The Accounting Review (October).
Davidovich, L. 2005. “Quantum Information,” MRS Bulletin, February.
Demski, J. and H. Frimor. 2000. “Performance Measure Garbling Under Renegotiation in Multi-Period Agencies,” Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement).
Dirac, P. 1958. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Eger, J. 2005. Einstein’s Violin. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin
Eichenwald, K. 2005. Conspiracy of Fools. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
Feller, W. 1950. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applictions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Fellingham, J., P. Newman, and Y. Suh. 1985. “Contracts Without Memory in Multi-period Agency Models,” Journal of Economic Theory, December.
Fellingham, J. and D. Schroeder. 2005. “Quantum Information and Accounting,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, forthcoming.
Feynman, R., R. Leighton, and M. Sands. 1963. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, volume 1. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Liang, P. 2000. “Accounting Recognition, Moral Hazard, and Communication,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 2000.
Liang, P. 2001. “Recognition: An Information Content Perspective,” Accounting Horizons, September.
McLean, B. and P. Elkind. 2004. The Smartest Guys in the Room. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Milburn, G. 1998. The Feynman Processor: Quantum Entanglement and the Computing Revolution. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
Nahin, P. 1998. An Imaginary Tale: The Story of √−1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Newman, P., and R. Sansing. 1993. “Disclosure Policies with Multiple Users,” Journal of Accounting Research (Spring).
Nielsen, M. and I. Chuang. 2002. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nielsen, M. 2003. “Simple Rules for a Complex Quantum World,” Scientific American, 288(5).
Penrose, R. 2004. The Road to Reality. New York, NY: Random House, Inc.
Sunder, S. 1997. Theory of Accounting and Control. Cincinnati, OH: International Thomson.
Tegmark, M. and J. Wheeler. 2001. “As Quantum Theory Celebrates its 100th Birthday, Spectacular Successes are Mixed with Persistent Puzzles,” Scientific American (February).
Zeilinger, A. 2000. “Quantum Teleportation,” Scientific American, Volume 282(4).
Zuric, W. 1991. “Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical,” Physics Today (October).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fellingham, J., Schroeder, D. (2007). Synergy, Quantum Probabilities, and Cost of Control. In: Antle, R., Gjesdal, F., Liang, P.J. (eds) Essays in Accounting Theory in Honour of Joel S. Demski. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30399-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30399-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-30397-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-30399-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)