Abstract
Where there is no viable alternative, studies of neuronal activity are conducted on animals. The use of animals, particularly for invasive studies of the brain, raises a number of ethical issues. Practical or normative ethics are enforced by legislation, in relation to the dominant welfare guidelines developed in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Guidelines have typically been devised to cover all areas of biomedical research using animals in general, and thus lack any specific focus on neuroscience studies at the level of the ethics, although details of the specific welfare recommendations are different for invasive studies of the brain. Ethically, there is no necessary distinction between neuroscience and other biomedical research in that the brain is a final common path for suffering, irrespective of whether this involves any direct experience of pain. One exception arises in the case of in vitro studies, which are normally considered as an acceptable replacement for in vivo studies. However, to the extent sentience is possible, maintaining central nervous system tissue outside the body naturally raises ethical questions. Perhaps the most intractable challenge to the ethical use of animals in order to model neuronal disorder is presented by the logical impasse in the argument that the animal is similar enough to justify the validity of the experimental model, but sufficiently different in sentience and capacity for suffering, for the necessary experimental procedures to be permissible.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andjus RK, Suhara K, Sloviter HA (1967) An isolated, perfused rat brain preparation, its spontaneous and stimulated activity. J Appl Physiol 22:1033–1039
Babalian AL, Ryugo DK, Vischer MW et al (1999) Inhibitory synaptic interactions between coclear nuclei: evidence from an in vitro whole brain study. Neuroreport 10:1913–1917
Balcombe J (2009) Animal pleasure and its moral significance. Appl Anim Behav Sci 118:208–216
Barnard C (2007) Ethical regulation and animal science: why animal behaviour is special. Anim Behav 74:5–13
Barnard CJ, Hurst JL (1996) Welfare by design: the natural selection of welfare criteria. Anim Welf 5:405–433
Baumans V, Van Loo PLP (2013) How to improve housing conditions of laboratory animals: the possibilities of environmental refinement. Vet J 195:24–32
Baylen CA, Rosenberg H (2006) A review of the acute subjective effects of MDMA/ecstasy. Addiction 101:933–947
Blakemore C, MacArthur Clark J, Nevalainen T et al (2012) Implementing the 3Rs in neuroscience research: a reasoned approach. Neuron 75:948–950
Bonardi C, Bartle C, Bowles K et al (2010) Some appetitive procedures for examining associative learning in the mouse: Implications for psychopathology. Behav Brain Res 211:240–247
Breschi GL, Librizzi L, Pastori C et al (2010) Functional and structural correlates of magnetic resonance patterns in a new in vitro model of cerebral ischemia by transient occlusion of the medial cerebral artery. Neurobiol Dis 39:181–191
Cassaday HJ, Finger BC, Horsley RR (2008) Methylphenidate and nicotine focus responding to an informative discrete CS over successive sessions of appetitive conditioning. J Psychopharmacol 22:849–859
Chatterjee A (2004) Cosmetic neurology—the controversy over enhancing movement, mentation, and mood. Neurology 63:968–974
Chmiel DJ, Noonan M (1996) Preference of laboratory rats for potentially enriching stimulus objects. Lab Anim 30:97–101
Coltheart M (2006) Perhaps functional neuroimaging has not told us anything about the mind (so far). Cortex 42:422–427
de Curtis M, Paré D, Linás RR (1991) The electrophysiology of the olfactory-hippocampal circuit in the isolated and perfused adult mammalian brain in vitro. Hippocampus 1:341–354
Crook RJ, Walters ET (2011) Nociceptive behaviour and physiology of molluscs: animal welfare implications. ILAR J 52:185–195
Dawkins MS (2006) A user’s guide to animal welfare science. Trends Ecol Evol 21:77–82
Deacon RMJ (2006) Appetitive position discrimination in the T-maze. Nat Protoc 1:13–15
du Toit L, Bennett NC, Nickless A et al (2012) Influence of spatial environment on maze learning in an African mole-rat. Anim Cogn 15:797–806
Editorial (2010) Ethical neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 13:141
Commission European (2010) Official J European Union L 276:33–79
Farah MJ (2012) Neuroethics: the ethical, legal, and societal impact of neuroscience. Annu Rev Psychol 63:571–591
Fitchett AE, Barnard CJ, Cassaday HJ (2006) There’s no place like home: cage odours and place preference in subordinate CD-1 male mice. Physiol Behav 87:955–962
Fornari RV, Wichmann R, Altsak P et al (2012) Rodent stereotaxic surgery and animal welfare outcome improvements for behavioural neuroscience. J Vis Exp 59:e3528
Funk CM, Gazzaniga MS (2009) The functional brain architecture of human morality. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19:678–681
Hansen LA (2013) Institution animal care and use committees need greater ethical diversity. J Med Ethics 39:188–190
Hobson-West P (2012) Ethical boundary-work in the animal research laboratory. Sociology 46:649–663
Hoeyer K, Koch L (2006) The ethics of functional genomics: same, same, but different? Trends Biotechnol 24:387–389
Horsley RR, Moran PM, Cassaday HJ (2008) Appetitive overshadowing is disrupted by systemic amphetamine but not by electrolytic lesions to the nucleus accumbens shell. J Psychopharmacol 22:172–181
Hughes JE, Amyx H, Howard JL et al (1994) Health effects of water restriction to motivate lever-pressing in rats. Lab Anim Sci 44:135–140
Ideland M (2009) Different views on ethics: how animal ethics is situated in a committee culture. J Med Ethics 35:258–261
Illes J, Tairyan K, Federico CA et al (2010) Reducing barriers to ethics in neuroscience. Front Hum Neurosci 4:Article 167
Kahane G, Wiech K, Shackel N et al (2011) The neral basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 7:393–402
Lind NM, Moustgaard A, Jelsing J et al (2007) The use of pigs in neuroscience: modelling brain disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31:728–751
Logothetis NK (2008) What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453:869–878
Lund TB, Sorensen TI, Olsson AS et al (2013). Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research. J Med Ethics. doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100368
Mameli M, Bortolotti L (2006) Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading. J Med Ethics 32:84–89
McCutcheon JE, Marinelli M (2009) Technical spotlight: age matters. Eur J Neurosci 29:997–1014
Moore THM, Zammit S, Lingford-Hughes A et al (2007) Cannabis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet 370:319–328
Naleid AM, Grimm JW, Kessler DA et al (2008) Deconstructing the vanilla milkshake: the dominant effect of sucrose on self-administration of nutrient-flavor mixtures. Appetite 50:128–138
National Research Council (2011) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th edn. National Academies Press, Washington DC
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2005) The ethics of research involving animals. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London
The Nuremberg Code (1947) In: Mitscherlich A, Mielke F Doctors of infamy: The story of the Nazi medical crimes. 2008 Kessinger Publishing, Whitefish
Nelson AJD, Thur KE, Marsden CA et al (2011a) Dopamine in nucleus accumbens: salience modulation in latent inhibition and overshadowing. J Psychopharmacol 25:1649–1660
Nelson AJD, Thur KE, Horsley RR et al (2011b) Reduced dopamine function within the medial shell of the nucleus accumbens enhances latent inhibition. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 98:1–7
Ohl F, van der Staay (2012) Animal welfare: at the interface between science and Society. Vet J 192:13–19
Olarte-Sánchez CM, Valencia-Torres L, Cassaday HJ et al (2013) Effects of SKF-83566 and haloperidol on performance on progressive-ratio schedules maintained by sucrose and corn oil reinforcement: quantitative analysis using a new model derived from the Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement (MPR). Psychopharmacology (Berl) 230:617–630
Olsson IAS, Franco NH, Weary DM et al (2011) The 3Rs principle—mind the ethical gap! ALTEX Proceedings, 1/12, Proceedings of WC8:333–336
Paré D, deCurtis M, Linás RR (1992) Role of the hippocampal-entorhinal loop in temporal lobe epilepsy: extra- and intracellular study in the isolated and guinea pig brain in vitro. J Neurosci 12:1867–1881
Parrott AC (2001) Human psychopharmacology of Ecstasy (MDMA): a review of 15 years of empirical research. Hum Psychopharmacol 16:557–577
Patterson-Kane EG, Pittman M, Pajor EA (2008) Operant animal welfare: productive approaches and persistent difficulties. Anim Welf 17:139–148
Randall PA, Pardo M, Nunes EJ et al (2012) Dopaminergic modulation of effort-related choice behavior as assessed by a progressive ratio chow feeding choice task: pharmacological studies and the role of individual differences. PLoS ONE 7:e47934
Regan T (1984) The case for animal rights. Routledge, London
Rowland NE (2007) Food or fluid restriction in common laboratory animals: balancing welfare considerations with scientific inquiry. Comp Med 57:149–160
Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique, 2nd edn, 1992 UFAW. Methuen, London
Ryder R (1975) Victims of science: the use of animals in research. Open Gate Press, London
Sarter M, Berntson GG, Cacioppo JT (1996) Brain imaging and cognitive neuroscience—toward strong inference in attributing function to structure. Am Psychol 51:13–21
Schmitt WB, Deacon RMJ, Seeburg PH et al (2003) A within-subjects, within-task demonstration of intact spatial reference memory with impaired spatial working memory in glutamate receptor-A-deficient mice. J Neurosci 23:3953–3958
Schmitt WB, Deacon RMJ, Reisel D et al (2004) Spatial reference memory in GluR-A-deficient mice using a novel hippocampal-dependent paddling pool escape task. Hippocampus 14:216–223
Sherwin CM (2001) Can invertebrates suffer? or, how robust is argument-by-analogy? Anim Welf 10:S103–S118
Singer P (1975) Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. Avon Books, New York
Soar K, Turner JJD, Parrott AC (2006) Problematic versus non-problematic ecstasy/MDMA use: the influence of drug usage patterns and pre-existing psychiatric factors. J Psychopharmacol 20:24–417
Verdoux H, Gindre C, Sorbara F et al (2003) Effects of cannabis and psychosis vulnerability in daily life: an experience sampling test study. Psychol Med 33:23–32
Wise RA (2008) Dopamine and reward: the anhedonia hypothesis 30 years on. Neurotox Res 14:169–183
Würbel H (2009) Ethology applied to animal ethics. Appl Anim Behav Sci 118:118–127
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Pru Hobson-West, Tobias Bast, Gareth Hathway and Denis Schluppeck for comments and advice. The experimental work conducted in the author’s laboratory was supported by the Wellcome Trust (ref. 082940) and the BBSRC (ref. BB/K004980/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cassaday, H.J. (2014). What’s Special about the Ethical Challenges of Studying Disorders with Altered Brain Activity?. In: Lee, G., Illes, J., Ohl, F. (eds) Ethical Issues in Behavioral Neuroscience. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, vol 19. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2014_333
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2014_333
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44865-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44866-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)